Cultural Repertoire of Critical Consumption Youth Veg-Community
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Cultural Repertoire of Critical Consumption Youth Veg-Community
Annotation
PII
S013216250007096-8-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Elvira M. Arif 
Occupation: Research Fellow in Center for Youth Studies
Affiliation: National Research University Higher School of Economics in St. Petersburg
Address: Russian Federation, St. Petersburg
Edition
Pages
119-126
Abstract

A Neo-tribe is one of the fluid communities in modern societies  exemplified by consumer groups. The article analyses the veg-community in Saint- Petersburg and discusses the boundaries of this urban fluid community. The case study was held in Saint-Petersburg. The "cultural food repertoire " notion was used to describe the veg-community. Based on the analysis of veg-repertoires, the boundaries of the community were demarkated through the definition of "Close ones", "Others" and "Aliens". The article presents four types of veg-nutrition cultural repertoire: animal care, healthy lifestyle, religious development and self-development. Omnivores included in the practice of ethical consumption  are defined as "others" by members of the veg-community. And omnivorous, hedonistic-oriented consumption is seen as ''alien''. The analysis suggests that communities formed among young people han a critical consumption basis.

Keywords
youth, critical consumption, veg-community, vegans, vegetarians, raw, nutrition discourses, neo-tribes
Acknowledgment
This article is based on the materials of the project “Fields of positive interethnic interactions and youth cultural scenes in the Russian cities” supported by the Russian Science Foundation under Grant no. 15-18-00078.
Received
11.10.2019
Date of publication
13.10.2019
Number of purchasers
89
Views
568
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S013216250007096-8-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 07.10.2019
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Autio M., Heiskanen E., Heinonen V. (2014) The narratives of “green” consumers: anti-hero, eco-hero and anarchist. Labirint. Zhurnal social'no-gumanitarnyh issledovanij [Labyrinth. Journal of Philosophy and Social Sciences]. No. 2:19–34. (In Russ.)

2. Biryukova Yu. A. (2017) Features of the New Age Movement Phenomenon. Estestvenno-gumanitarnye issledovaniya [Natural Humanitarian Studies]. No. 15 (1): 33–36. (In Russ.)

3. Boyko M. A. (2006) The role of the discursive factors “Own”, “Alien”, “Other” in the process of forming a collective media identity. Politicheskaya lingvistika [Political linguistics]. No. 17: 163–178. (In Russ.)

4. Chudova I. (2010) Speech markers of poverty / security in the discourse of the village. Sovremennyj diskurs analiz [Modern discourse analysis]. No. 2 (2): 4–24. (In Russ.)

5. Davies B., Harre R. (1990) Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. Vol. 20. № 1: 43–63. 

6. Gorskaya D. (2017) Spiritual Foundations of Downshifting. XX International Conference in Memory of Professor L. N. Kogan “Culture, Personality, Society in the Modern World: Methodology, Experience of Empirical Research”, March 16-18, 2017, Ekaterinburg. Yekaterinburg: UrFU: 337–342. (In Russ.)

7. Gurova O., Tolkacheva A. (2014) Critical Approach to Consumption. Labirint. Zhurnal social'no-gumanitarnyh issledovanij [Labyrinth. Journal of Social and Humanitarian Studies]. No.1: 4–8. (In Russ.)

8. Johnston J., Szabo M., Rodney A. (2011) Good food, good people: Understanding the cultural repertoire of ethical eating. Journal of Consumer Culture. Vol. 11. No. 3: 293–318.

9. Kozina I. (1997) Case study: Some methodological problems. Rubezh. No. 10–11. P. 177-189. (In Russ.)

10. Krupets Ya.N., Nartova N.A. (2014) “Slim means normal”: body management among urban youth. Zhurnal issledovanij social'noj politiki. [Journal of Social Policy Studies]. Vol. 12. No. 4: 523–538. (In Russ.)

11. Kuzmin A.G. (2016) Antifa subculture as a socio-political phenomenon: the experience of studying in the city of Syktyvkar. Komi Science Center of UB RAS. No. 1 (25): 97–103. (In Russ.)

12. Lindeman M., Sirelius M. (2001) Food choice ideologies. The modern manifestations of normative and humanist views of the world. Appetite. No. 37: 175–184.

13. Maffesoli M. (1996) The time of the tribes: The decline of individualism in mass society. London: Sage.

14. Novikova M.V., Sultaeva N.L., Galitsky V.V. (2013) On the issue of nutritional features of adherents of various religious traditions. Service in Russia and abroad. No. 5: 96–116. (In Russ.)

15. Omelchenko E.L., Polyakov S.I. (2017) The concept of the cultural scene as a theoretical perspective and an analysis tool for urban youth communities. Sociological Review. Volume 16. No. 2: 111-132. (In Russ.)

16. Salzman M. (2000) Rise of the prosumer. Marketing. Vol. 54. No. 6: 141–153.

17. Steel C. (2014) Hungry City: How Food Shapes Our Lives. Moscow: Strelka Press. (In Russ.)

18. Trotsuk I.V., Davydenkova E.S. (2015) The phenomenon of ethical consumerism: the specifics of the sociological interpretation and features of modern existence. Bulletin of Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: Sociology. No. 1: 65–81. (In Russ.)

19. Utkin, A.I., Fedotova, V.G., Fedotov, L.N. (2009) Ecological-Political and Ecological Sociological Discourses. Znanie. Umenie. Ponimanie [Knowledge. Understanding. Skill]. No. 4: 63– 69. (In Russ.)

20. Zarubina N.N. (2015) Ideas about the “normative body” as determinants of changes in the nutrition practices of Russians. Historical psychology and sociology of history. Vol. 8. No. 1: 575–91. (In Russ.)

21. Zarubina N.N. (2016) Vegetarianism in Russia: an individual choice against traditions. Historical psychology and sociology of history. No. 2: 137–154. (In Russ.)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate