Везде
Shmuel Eisenstadt’s Sociology of Revolution
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Shmuel Eisenstadt’s Sociology of Revolution
Annotation
PII
S013216250007152-0-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Eduard Shults 
Affiliation: Moscow State Regional University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Edition
Issue 10
Pages
146-156
Abstract

The article analyses basic provisions of the theory of revolution by Israeli sociologist Shmuel Eisenstadt. His sociological concept of revolution remains still understudied, meanwhile, it is of huge interest due to its impact on a large number of researchers from various social sciences, especially in problems of the theory of revolution, the generalizing works and studying of the specific revolutions. The first large work of Sh. Eisenstadt devoted to revolutions was published in 1978, but the author kept reflecting on revolutions until the end of life, partially refreshing his conclusions and developing them. Special attention in the article is paid to two corner stones, from the point of view of the author, of Eisenstadt's theory of revolution: theory of modernization and "axial civilizations" concept. Questions connected with the reasons and consequences of revolutions, social composition and ideologies are considered. From Eisenstadt’ point of view, revolutions are complex social phenomena which involves various big social groups. The ideology of revolutions which provides motivation of participation to these social groups in many respects is based on the principles, classical for social psychology, which by the time of the revolutions became already traditional, including, Utopian ideas connected with traditional social demand for a just society. At the same time, revolutions lead to new society - the society constructed on other principles, the principles differentiating modern style civilization from the previous ones. The first cases of such transition occurred in one of axial civilizations – Christian and European that made a westernization the first and main model for modernization, but not the only one for the non-European societies.

Keywords
theory of revolution, sociology of revolution, aftermath of revolutions, modernization, modernity
Received
10.10.2019
Date of publication
13.10.2019
Number of purchasers
89
Views
601
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S013216250007152-0-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 10.10.2019
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Abel W. (1935) Agrarkrisen und Agrarkonjunktur in Mitteleuropa vom 13. bis zum 19. Jahrhundert. Berlin.

2. Arendt H. (1990) On Revolution. London: Penguine Books.

3. Brinton С. (1938) The Anatomy of Revolution. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

4. Calvert P. (1970) A study of revolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

5. Calvert P. (1970) Revolution. London: Praeger.

6. Camus A. (1998) Homo revolting. In Camus A. Works in five volumes. V. 3. Kharkov: Folio: 59–360. (In Russ.)

7. Dunn J. (1972) Modern Revolutions: An Introduction to the Analysis of a Political Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

8. Edwards L.P. (1927) The Natural History of Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

9. Eisenstadt S. (1999) Revolution and the Transformation of Societies: a Comparative Study of Civilizations. Moscow: Aspect-Press. (In Russ.)

10. Eisenstadt S.N. (1978) Revolution and the Transformation of Societies: a Comparative Study of Civilizations. New York: Free Press.

11. Eisenstadt S.N. (1999) Fundamentalism, Sectarianism, and Revolution: The Jacobin Dimension of Modernity. Cambridge University Press.

12. Eisenstadt S.N. (2002) Some Observations on Multiple Modernities. In Reflections on Multiple Modernities: European, Chinese and Other Interpretations. Ed. by D. Sachsenmaier, S.N. Eisenstadt, J. Riedel. BRILL: 27–41.

13. Eisenstadt S.N. (2003) Comparative Civilizations and Multiple Modernities. BRILL.

14. Eisenstadt S.N. (2004) The Civilizational Dimension of Modernity. In: Rethinking Civilizational Analysis. Ed by S.A. Arjomand, E.A. Tiryakian. Sage Publication Ltd.: 48–66.

15. Eisenstadt S.N. (2006) The Great Revolutions and the Civilizations of Modernity. Brill.

16. Ellul J. Autopsy of Revolution. New York: Knopf, 1971.

17. Foran J. (2005) Taking Power. On the Origins of Third World Revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

18. Foran J. (2007) Revolutions. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Ed. by G. Ritzer. Blackwell Publishing: 3914–3923.

19. Gilman N. (2003) Mandarins of the Future: Modernization Theory in Cold War America. Baltimore-London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

20. Goldstone J. (2010). The New Population Bomb: The Four Megatrends that will Change the World. Foreign Affairs. Vol. 89. No. 1. P. 31-43.

21. Goldstone J.A. (1982) The Comparative and Historical Study of Revolutions. Annual Review of Sociology. Vol. 8. P. 187-207.

22. Goldstone J.A. (1991). Revolution and Rebellion in the Early Modern World. Berkeley: University of California Press.

23. Goldstone J.A. (2000) Predicting Revolutions: Why We Could (and Should) have Foreseen the Revolutions of 1989–1991 in the U.S.S.R. and Eastern Europe. In: Revolution: Critical Concepts in Political Science. Ed. by O'Kane R.H.T. Vol. 4. Taylor & Francis: 395–416.

24. Gurr T.R. Why Men Rebel? Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1970.

25. Hagopian M.N. The Phenomenon of Revolution. New York: Dodd, Mead, 1975.

26. Huntington S.P. (1968) Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven:Yale University Press.

27. Huntington S.P. (2005) Political Order in Changing Societies. Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.)

28. Inglehart R., Welzel C. (2005) Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge University Press.

29. Jaspers K. (1991). The Origin and Goal of History. Moscow: Politizdat. (In Russ.)

30. Johnson Ch. (1964) Revolution and the Social System. The Hoover Institute of War, Revolution and Peace, Stanford University Press.

31. Johnson Ch. (1982) Revolutionary Change. Stanford University Press.

32. Kimmel M.S. (1990) Revolution. A Sociological Interpretation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

33. Le Bon G. (1995) The Psychology of Socialism. St. Petersburg: Model. (In Russ.)

34. Marx K. (1957) The bourgeoisie and the Counter-Revolution. In: Marx K., Engels F. Collected Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 6. Moscow: Politizdat: 109–134. (In Russ.)

35. Marx K. (1960) The Civil War in France. In: Marx K., Engels F. Collected Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 17. Moscow: Politizdat: 317–370. (In Russ.)

36. Meisel J.H (1966). Counterrevolution: How Revolution Die. New York: Atherton Press.

37. Mikhaylova Yu.D. (1991) Social and Political Thought of Japan (the 60-80th years of XIX c.). Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)

38. Miсhels R. (2000) Democratic aristocracy and aristocratic democracy. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 1: 107–116. (In Russ.)

39. Moore B. (1974) Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Penguin University Books.

40. Pettee G.S. (1938) The Process of Revolution. New York: Harper & Brothers.

41. Rejai M. (1973) The Strategy of Political Revolution. N.Y.: Doubleday & Company.

42. Rejai M. (1977) The Comparative Study of Revolutionary Strategy. McKay. Revolution (1966): Yearbook of the American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy. Ed. by C.J. Friedrich. New York: Atherton Press.

43. Selbin E. Modern Latin American Revolutions. 2nd ed. Boulder, CO.: Westview Press, 1999.

44. Shults E.E. (2016) Theory of Revolution: Revolutions and Modern Civilizations. Moscow: LENAND. (In Russ.)

45. Shults E.E. (2018) The November revolution of 1918 in Germany and problems of emergence, development and failure of the Weimar republic. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. «Istoriya» [Bulletin of the Tomsk state university. History series]. No. 426: 223–228. (In Russ.)

46. Skocpol T. (1979) States and Social Revolutions. A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China. Cambridge University Press.

47. Skocpol T., Trimberger E.K. (1994) Revolutions and the World-historical Development of Capitalism. In Skocpol T. Social Revolutions in the Modern World. Cambridge University Press: 120–132.

48. Sorokin P.A. (1925) The Sociology of Revolution. J.B. Lippincott.

49. Sorokin P.A. (2005) Sociology of Revolution. Мoscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

50. Spengler O. (2002) Prussianism And Socialism. Moscow: Praksis. (In Russ.)

51. Stone L. (1966) Theories of revolution. World Politics. Vol. XVIII. No. 2: 159–176.

52. Stone L. (2005) The Causes of the English Revolution, 1529–1642. London – New York: Routledge.

53. Sztompka P. (2005) Sociology. Analysis of Modern Society. Мoscow: Logos. (In Russ.)

54. Therborn G. (2008) Roads to modernity: revolutionary and other. In Revolution in the Making of the Modern World: Social Identities, Globalization, and Modernity. Ed. by J. Foran, D. Lane, A. a Zivkovic. Routledge: xiv–xvii.

55. Tilly C., Tilly L., Tilly R.H. (1975) The Rebellious Century, 1830–1930. Harvard University Press.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate