THE LEARNED DAMSELS ARE RIDICULOUS? (THE PROBLEM OF LEARNED WOMENS STIGMATIZATION AND THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL EXPECTATIONS ON WOMENS LIFE STRATEGIES AND LIFESTYLES)

Pushkareva, Natalya L.

Home>Issue 4>"THE LEARNED DAMSELS ARE RIDICULOUS?" (THE PROBLEM OF LEARNED WOMEN'S STIGMATIZATION AND THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL EXPECTATIONS ON WOMEN'S LIFE STRATEGIES AND LIFESTYLES)

"THE LEARNED DAMSELS ARE RIDICULOUS?" (THE PROBLEM OF LEARNED WOMEN'S STIGMATIZATION AND THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL EXPECTATIONS ON WOMEN'S LIFE STRATEGIES AND LIFESTYLES)

Table of contents

Annotation Estimate Publication content

References Comments

"THE LEARNED DAMSELS ARE RIDICULOUS?" (THE PROBLEM OF LEARNED WOMEN'S STIGMATIZATION AND THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL EXPECTATIONS ON WOMEN'S LIFE STRATEGIES AND LIFESTYLES)

Annotation

PII

S0205-96060000527-6-

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Natalya L. Pushkareva Send message

ORCID: 0000-0001-6295-3331

Edition

Volume 38 Issue 4

Pages

756-770

Abstract

The concept of stigma introduced by E. Goffman, a characteristic that deviates from the established norms or stereotypes expected from an individual / group, has proved to be a handy tool widely used in sociology. This paper is devoted to the stigmatization of women interested or professionally engaged in science in Russia in the past and in the present from the historical and contemporary perspective. The factors conducive to stigmatization as well as particular features of women scientists' professional trajectories are analyzed. The paper continues the years-long studies by the author writing about the gender component of the system of characteristics of scientific community in the USSR and contemporary Russia.

Keywords

science, women, gender, gender symmetry, discrimination

Date of publication

01.10.2017

Number of purchasers

Views

1395

Readers community rating

0.0 (0 votes)

Previous versions

S0205-96060000527-6-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 22.10.2020

Cite Download pdf

GOST	Pushkareva N. "THE LEARNED DAMSELS ARE RIDICULOUS?" (THE PROBLEM OF LEARNED WOMEN'S STIGMATIZATION AND THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL EXPECTATIONS ON WOMEN'S LIFE STRATEGIES AND LIFESTYLES) // Voprosy istorii estestvoznaniia i tekhniki. – 2017. – V. 38. – Issue 4 C. 756-770 .
MLA	Pushkareva, Natalya L ""THE LEARNED DAMSELS ARE RIDICULOUS?" (THE PROBLEM OF LEARNED WOMEN'S STIGMATIZATION AND THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL EXPECTATIONS ON WOMEN'S LIFE STRATEGIES AND LIFESTYLES)." Voprosy istorii estestvoznaniia i tekhniki. 38.4 (2017).:756-770.
APA	Pushkareva N. (2017). "THE LEARNED DAMSELS ARE RIDICULOUS?" (THE PROBLEM OF LEARNED WOMEN'S STIGMATIZATION AND THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL EXPECTATIONS ON WOMEN'S LIFE STRATEGIES AND LIFESTYLES). Voprosy istorii estestvoznaniia i tekhniki. vol. 38, no. 4, pp.756-770

References

Additional sources and materials

1. Bovina I. G, Bovin V. G. Stigmatizatsiya: sotsial'no-psikhologicheskie aspekty // Psikhologiya i pravo. 2013. № 3. C. 13 
 2. Gagnon, N. On the Life Accounts//Biography and Society: The Life History Approach in the Social Sciences/D. Bertaux (ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1981 
 3. Pomyalovskij N. G. Molotov//http://az.lib.ru/p/pomjalowskij_n_g/text_0020.shtmL 
 4. Paustovskij K. G. Fyon//http://paustovskiy.niv.ru/paustovskiy/text/kolhida/kolhida_4.htm 
 5. Lyskova I. E. Problemy uchaschejsya molodezhi Rossii kontsa XIX -nachala KhKh vv. v osveschenii N. I. Kareeva. Syktyvkar, 2010. S. 163 
 6. Crocker, J., Major, B., Steele, C. Social Stigma//Handbook of Social Psychology/D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, G. Lindzey (eds.). Boston: McGraw-Hill, 1998. R. 504-553 
 7. Croker, J., Major, B. Social Stigma and Self-Esteem: The Self-Protective Properties of Stigma//Psychological Review. 1989. Vol. 96. No. 4. P. 608-630 
 8. Linkova M. «Nauka poka opiraetsya na muzhskie tsennosti»//http://www.radio.cz/ru/rubrika/razgovor/marcela-linkova-nauka-poka-opiraetsya-na-muzhskie-cennosti 
 9. Berger P., Lukman T. Sotsial'noe konstruirovanie real'nosti. Traktat po sotsiologii znaniya. M.: Medium, 1995. S. 231 
 10. Boroda pomogla by zhenschine stat' professorom//https://lenta.ru/news/2004/12/17/beard/ 
 11. Vaschenko S. V. Problemy gendernogo balansa v oblasti fiziko-tekhnicheskikh nauk//Zhenschiny i nauka -istoriya i sovremennost'/Red.-sost. R. F. Vitman. SPb.: Izd-vo Politekhnicheskogo universiteta, 2007. S. 177-180 (sm. takzhe: http://belwomnet.iatp.by/list_ file.php?p=27%C0%03d=27&c=5&file=5_drugoe_science_vashchenko.html) 
 12. Kochina P. Ya. Nauka. Lyudi. Gody. M.: Nauka, 1988. S. 263. 
 13. Mustafina S. S. Ajdarova: «Strana obyazana byt' protsvetayuschej»//http://www. dknews.kz/article.php?id=963&archid=39. 
 14. Osobaya sud'ba. Interv'yu s T. I. Rudnevoj//http://www.universite.ru/index. php?option=com_content&task=view&id=322&Itemid=72 
 15. Demina N. Revekka Frumkina: «Esli nauka dlya vas -ne strast', zajmites' chem-nibud' esche//http://www.polit.ru/article/2006/07/24/frumkina/ 
 16. Vot on kakoj, muzhskoj shovinizm!//http://www.aspirantura.spb.ru/cgi-bin/ib/printpage. cgi?forum=2&topic=506 
 17. Agamova N. S., Allakhverdyan A. G. Dinamika chislennosti kadrov v sotsial'nykh naukakh i aspiranture: gendernoe issledovanie//Institut istorii estestvoznaniya i tekhniki im. S. I. Vavilova. Godichnaya nauchnaya konferentsiya (2013). M.: LENAND, 2013. T. 1 (Obschie problemy razvitiya nauki i tekhniki. Istoriya fiziko-matematicheskikh nauk). S. 248-249 
 18. Avdulov A. N. Preodolevaya predubezhdeniya i bar'ery: o realizatsii potentsiala zhenschin v nauke i tekhnike//Sotsial'nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura Ser. 8. Naukovedenie (RZh INION RAN). 2008. № 1. S. 156 
 19. Tartakovskaya I. Kar'era zhenschiny v industrii//Chelovecheskie resursy. 1998. № 2. S. 36-41 
 20. 23Demina. Revekka Frumkina..; Frumkina R.M. O nas -naiskosok. M.: Russkie slovari, 1997. 
 21. Kochina. Nauka. Lyudi. Gody. S. 262. 
 22. Kushnareva G. Edinstvennaya //Vladivostok (gazeta). 1 fevralya 2005 g. № 1696 (sm. takzhe: http://vladnews.ru/1696/lichnost/edinstvennaya). 
 23. Levada Yu. Chelovek nedovol'nyj: protest i terpenie//Monitoring obschestvennogo mneniya: ehkonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny. 1991. № 6 (44). S. 7 
 24. Sycheva S. A. Vozmozhna li kar'era zhenschiny v rossijskoj nauke//Vestnik RAN. 2003. T. 73. № 7. S. 622. 
 25. Tam zhe. S. 625. 
 26. Sistematizatsiya grupp Yu. Levady. Sm. Levada. Chelovek nedovol'nyj.. S. 12. 
 27. Agamova N. S., Allakhverdyan A. G. Rossijskie zhenschiny v nauke i vysshej shkole: isto-riko-nauchnye i naukovedcheskie aspekty (k 150-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya S. V. Kovalevskoj)//VIET. 2000. № 1. S. 141-153 
 28. Pushkareva N. L. «Da zachem mne ehto nuzhno?!» (pochemu rossijskie zhenschiny-uchenye ne «rvutsya spesivo» k nauchnoj slave)//Rossijskaya povsednevnost' v zerkale gendernykh otnoshenij: sb. st./Otv. red. i sost. N. L. Pushkareva. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2013. C. 838-855 
 29. Sycheva. Vozmozhna li kar'era zhenschiny.. S. 625. 
 30. Uchenye vyyasnili, kak pravil'no pooschryat' sotrudnikov//http://www.bitpersonal.ru/news.htm?news=all. 
 31. Frumkina. O nas -naiskosok. S. 184. 
 32. Balabanova E. S. Gendernye razlichiya strategij sovladaniya s zhiznennymi trudnostyami//Sotsis. 2002. № 11. S. 32. 
 33. Remnyova M. L. «My byli romantikami i lyubili chitat'..»//Vremya, ostavsheesya s nami: filologicheskij fakul'tet v 1953-1958 gg. Vospominaniya vypusknikov. M.: Filologicheskij fakul'tet MGU im. M. V. Lomonosova; MAKS Press, 2004. S. 13 (sm. takzhe: http://www.philol.msu.ru/~alumni/memories/remniova/). 
 34. Kuramshina G. U nauki zhenskoe litso //Vatandash (Sootechestvennik). 2005. № 9 (sm. takzhe: http://www.vatandash.ru/index.php?article=451). 
 35. Vasil'eva A. Zhenschiny v nauke i obrazovanii //Zhenschina plyus. 1999. № 2 (sm. takzhe: http://www.owl.ru/win/womplus/1999/science.htm). 
 36. Sycheva. Vozmozhna li kar'era zhenschiny.. S. 625. 
 37. Sukovataya V. A. Feministskaya ehpistemologiya i ehtika kak popytki dekonstruktsii zhenskoj «drugovosti» v nauke//Vyunik Kharyuvs'kogo natsyunal'nogo ushversitetu 1mesh V. N. Karazsha. 2011. № 958. Vyp. 2. C. 229-235. 
 38. Terner R. Sravnitel'nyj kontent-analiz biografij//Voprosy sotsiologii. 1992. T 1. № 1. S. 121. 
 39. Simakova N. V. Zhenschiny-uchenye i perestrojka//Intelligentsiya i perestrojka/Otv. red. S. N. Bykova, V. A. Mansurov. M.: Institut sotsiologii AN SSSR, 1991. S. 169. 
 40. «Za fizikov ya by otdala pyat' devochek, vpolne khoroshikh devochek-laborantok, kotorye nam, odnako, ne nuzhny.. » (Davydova N. Vsya zhizn' plyus dva chasa. M.: Sovetskij pisatel', 1967. S. 2). 
 41. Crane, D. Social Class Origin and Academic Success: The Influence of Two Stratification System on Academic Careers//Sociology of Education. 1969. No. 42. P. 1-18. 
 42. Lanskikh E. Kakie trudnosti voznikayut u zhenschiny-uchenogo//https://www.gazeta.ru/education/2006/05/16_e_640532.shtml. 
 43. 46Dezhina I. Ischite, zhenschiny!//Poisk. 5 marta 2003 g. S. 5. 
 44. Ehntova A. Takaya znakomaya diskriminatsiya//http://www.jewishagency.org/ru/sites/default/files/Entova.pdf). 
 45. Na Altae obnaruzhili komarov-razvedchikov//https://www.chel.kp.ru/daily/24137/356264/ 
 46. Linkova. «Nauka poka opiraetsya na muzhskie tsennosti». 
 47. Davydova. Vsya zhizn'.. S. 5, 8. 
 48. Vedeneeva N. Tovarisch Tanya, vy bol'shoj uchenyj //Moskovskij komsomolets. 25 marta 2011 g. № 25600. S. 15. 
 49. Proskurina (Yavolovich) M. M. Feminizatsiya nauki kak sotsiologicheskaya problema//Sotsis. 2002. № 3. S. 76. 
 50. Pushkareva N.L. Nauka -ne zhenskoe delo? K istorii feminizatsii rossijskoj nauki v nachale XXI veka // Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. «Istoriya». 2012. № 14. Vyp. 2. S. 105-121. 
 51. Kharlamenkova N. E. Psikhologicheskij aspekt problemy samoutverzhdeniya lichnosti//Vestnik RGNF. 1996. № 3. S. 186-187.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review

Translate

References

Additional sources and materials

Comments

Via social network