Везде
Animal as the Other in Contemporary Philosophy
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Animal as the Other in Contemporary Philosophy
Annotation
PII
S023620070005903-0-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Oxana V. Timofeeva 
Occupation: Docent; Senior research fellow
Affiliation:
European University at St. Petersburg
RAS Institute of Philosophy
Address: 1, Shpalernaya Str., St. Petersburg 191187, Russian Federation
Edition
Volume 30 Issue 4
Pages
41-52
Abstract

The article suggests a philosophical analysis of the problem of the animal as the Other in the context of a discussion on the borders and criteria of differentiation between the animal and the human. It considers the animal as a concept, an image and an object and analyses practical and theoretical aspects of the question. Such an analysis underlies a brief outline of contemporary zoophilosophical conceptions and point towards a possible direction of critique of their limitations. Practical aspects of the question of the animal relates to the elaboration of strategies of the inclusion of the nonhuman animals in the domain of the law, rights, subjectivity, politics, language, art, communication, collaboration, recognition, and culture, i.e. in the domain of the human. This relates to the animal rights and animal liberation movement, to the ethical concern and political engagement, and ecological awareness. Theoretical aspects of the theme of the animal in contemporary philosophy relate to the critique of binary oppositions of the previous metaphysical tradition — of the human and animal, nature and culture, body and soul, mind and feelings, etc., — and mechanisms of exclusion of the Other from the human world defined by the authority of reason, logos, truth, etc. The problem is that the critics of humanism and anthropocentrism, when they address to the question of the animal, demonstrate a tendency of inverting hierarchies: in the past humans were considered as the top of evolution, and now as the source of evil. Without understanding of interdependence and dialectical relation between human and animal this opposition brings back to philosophical dualism whose dogmatic tendencies of privileging the one term while rejecting the other must be overcome.

Keywords
animal, human, Other, border, anthropocentrism, dialectics
Received
17.07.2019
Date of publication
30.07.2019
Number of purchasers
90
Views
1912
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S023620070005903-0-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 17.07.2019
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Agamben Dzh. Otkry’toe [The Open], trans. from Ital. and Ger. by B.M. Skuratov. Moscow: RGGU Publ., 2012.

2. Gegel’ G.V.F. E’nciklopediya filosofskix nauk. Tom 2 [Encyclopedia of Philosophy Sciences. Vol. 2]. Moscow: My’sl’, 1975. P. 410.

3. Delez Zh., Gvattari F. Ty’syacha plato: Kapitalizm i shizofreniya [Thousand Plateau: Capitalism and Schizophrenia], transl from French by Ya.I. Svirskiy. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya; Moscow: Astrel’ Publ., 2010.

4. Kozhevnikova M. Gibridy’ i ximery’ cheloveka i zhivotnogo: ot mifologii k biotexnologii [Hybrids and Chimeras of Human and Animal: From Mythology to Biotechnology]. Moscow: IFRAN Publ., 2017.

5. Opy’ty’ nechelovecheskogo gostepriimstva [Experiences of Inhuman Hospitality], eds. K. Sarkisova, M. Kramar. Moscow: V-A-C Press Publ., 2018.

6. Lakan Zh. Seminary’. Kniga 2. «Ya» v teorii Frejda i v texnike psixoanaliza (1954–1955) [The Seminar. Book 2. The ‘Ego’ in Freud’s Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis (1954–1955)], transl. from French by A. Chernoglazov. Moscow: Gnozis/Logos Publ., 2009. P. 508–516.

7. Singer P. Osvobozhdenie zhivotny’x [Animal Liberation]. Kiev: Kievskij e’kologo-kul’turny’j centr [Kiev Ecological and Cultural Center], 2002.

8. Timofeeva O. Istoriya zhivotny`x [The History of Animals]. Moscow: NLO Publ., 2017.

9. Fuko M. Istoriya bezumiya v klassicheskuyu e’poxu [The History of Madness in the Classical Era], transl from French by I.K. Staf. St. Petersburg: Universitetskaya kniga [University Book], 1997. P. 161.

10. Baratay E. Biographies animales. Des vies retrouvées [Animal Biographies. Found Lives]. Paris: Seuil Publ., 2017.

11. Baratay E. Le point de vue animal. Une autre version de l’histoire [From the Animal Point of View. Another Version of the History]. Paris: Seuil Publ., 2012.

12. Derrida J. And Say the Animal Responded?, transl. by Daniel W. Smith and Michael A. Greco. Zoontologies: The Question of the Animal. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press Publ., 2003.

13. Derrida J. The Animal That Therefore I Am, transl. by David Wills. N.Y.: Fordham University Press Publ., 2008.

14. Fontenay E. de. Le silence des bêtes. La philosophie à l’épreuve de l’animalité [The silence of the animals . Philosophy to the test of animality]. Paris: Fayard Publ., 1998.

15. Haraway D. When Species Meet. Minneapolis; London: University of Minnesota Press Publ., 2008.

16. Regan T. The case for animal rights. Berkeley; Los-Angeles: University of California Press Publ., 1983.

17. Wolfe C. What is Posthumanism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press Publ., 2010.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate