ON THE QUESTION OF THE TECHNO-TECHNOLOGICAL PECULIARITIES OF PEGTYMEL PETROGLYPHS
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
ON THE QUESTION OF THE TECHNO-TECHNOLOGICAL PECULIARITIES OF PEGTYMEL PETROGLYPHS
Annotation
PII
S0869-60630000392-4-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Edition
Pages
66-78
Abstract
Petroglyphs of the northernmost in Asia rock art site were created on the Kaikuul Bluff which stretches along the Pegtymel river some 40-50 km from the coast of the East Siberian Sea. Numerous petroglyphs are located on sandstone vertical cliffs, on separate stones and in a small shelter. The vast majority were pecked, there were also figures with the elements of abrasion and engraving. The field research in 2000-s by the team from the Institute of Archeology Russian Academy of Sciences has added considerably to the rock art collection from Northern Asia. There were identified more than 350 panels, they have been recorded. An innovative aspect of the research was the traceological program involving the study of petroglyphs' techniques and the material of the tools used for their pecking. By the result of the Pegtymel experiments the main diagnostic feature distinguishing pecking pits left by a stone punch tool from the iron tool traces was the quick change of the work area of a stone tool, the pecked traces showed a dynamic transformation from the sub-rounded or sub-quadrangular pits to the linear elongated ones. Another important feature of the use of stone tools was the wide entrance hole and the lack of sharp drops between the peaks and depressions. Comparison of the experimental stone tools reference materials with the rock art demonstrated that only a small part of the petroglyphs had comparable pecking.
Keywords
петроглифы, наскальное искусство, Чукотка
Date of publication
01.07.2014
Number of purchasers
1
Views
520
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

  1. Girya E.Yu., Dehvlet E.G. Nekotorye rezul'taty razrabotki metodiki izucheniya tekhniki vypolneniya petroglifov piketazhem // Ural. istor. vestn. Ekaterinburg, 2010. №1 (26). S. 107–118.
  2. Girya E.Yu., Dehvlet E.G. Ob issledovanii tekhniki vypolneniya izobrazhenij na skalakh // Problemy istorii, filologii, kul'tury. Vyp. 1 (35). M.; Magnitogorsk; Novosibirsk, 2012. S. 158–178.
  3. Golovnev A.V. Prostranstvennyj analiz petroglifov Pegtymelya (po polevym nablyudeniyam 1999 g.) // Integratsiya arkheologicheskikh i ehtnograficheskikh issledovanij. Vladivostok; Omsk: Izd-vo OmGPU, 2000. S. 185–188.
  4. Golovnev A.V. Antropologiya dvizheniya (drevnosti Severnoj Evrazii). Ekaterinburg: UrO RAN; Volot, 2009. 496 s.
  5. Dikov N.N. Problema ehtnicheskoj prinadlezhnosti pegtymel'skikh petroglifov // Ehtnogenez narodov Severnoj Azii. Mater. konf. Vyp. 1. Novosibirsk: IIFF SO AN SSSR, 1969. S. 125–127.
  6. Dikov N.N. Naskal'nye zagadki drevnej Chukotki. Petroglify Pegtymelya. M.: Nauka, 1971. 134 s.
  7. Dikov N.N. Pegtymel'skie petroglify – unikal'nyj arkheologicheskij pamyatnik Zapolyarnoj Chukotki // Naskal'nye risunki Evrazii. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1992. S. 44–49.
  8. Dehvlet E.G. Petroglify Pegtymelya: zastyvshij mif // Chukotka v proshlom i nastoyaschem / Nasledie narodov Rossijskoj Federatsii. Vyp. 11. M: NIITsentr, 2009. S. 258–267.
  9. Dehvlet E.G. Novoe v issledovanii naskal'nogo iskusstva Severnoj Evrazii // III Severnyj arkheologicheskij kongress. Ekaterinburg; Khanty-Mansijsk: IzdatNaukaServis, 2010. S. 180–208.
  10. Dehvlet E.G. O rabotakh po arkheologicheskomu izucheniyu naskal'nogo iskusstva Chukotki // Tr. Otd. istor.- filol. nauk RAN 2008–2013 / Red. V.A. Tishkov. M.: Nauka, 2014. S. 315–344.
  11. Dehvlet E.G., Girya E.Yu. “Izobrazitel'nyj plast” v naskal'nom iskusstve i issledovanie tekhniki vypolneniya petroglifov Severnoj Evrazii // Drevnee iskusstvo v zerkale arkheologii. Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuzizdat, 2011 (Tr. SAIPI; Vyp. VII). S. 186–201.
  12. Dehvlet E.G., Kochanovich A.V., Miklashevich E.A., Slobodzyan M.B., Dzini S., Antipina E.E. Pegtymel'skaya tetrad'. M.: IA RAN, 2006. 62 s.
  13. Dehvlet E.G., Miklashevich E.A., Mukhareva A.N. Novejshie polevye issledovaniya petroglifov Chukotki // Vestn. Ros. gumanit. nauch. fonda. M., 2009. № 3 (56). S. 213–223.
  14. Dehvlet E.G., Miklashevich E.A., Mukhareva A.N. Materialy k svodu petroglifov Chukotki (izobrazheniya v skopleniyakh I–III na Kajkuul'skom obryve) // Izobrazitel'nye i tekhnologicheskie traditsii v iskusstve Severnoj i Tsentral'noj Azii / Red. O.S. Sovetova, G.G. Korol'. M.; Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuzizdat, 2012. (Tr. SAIPI; Vyp. IX). S. 203–282.
  15. Kochanovich A.V., Dehvlet E.G. Ob izgotovlenii rezervnykh i vystavochnykh kopij petroglifov Kajkuul'skogo obryva // Pegtymel'skaya tetrad'. M.: IA RAN, 2006. S. 47–50.
  16. Petroglify Pegtymelya. SPb.: Antarsat, 2007. 167 s.
  17. Semenov S.A. Pervobytnaya tekhnika (Opyt izucheniya drevnejshikh orudij i izdelij po sledam raboty). M.; L.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1957 (MIA; № 54). 240 s.
  18. Semenov S.A., Schelinskij V.E. Mikrometricheskoe izuchenie sledov raboty na paleoliticheskikh orudiyakh // SA. № 1. 1971. S. 19–30.
  19. Tishkov V.A. Tundra i more. Chukotsko-ehskimosskaya rez'ba po kosti. M.: Indrik, 2008. 159 s.
  20. Shumkin V.Ya. Novye unikal'nyj petroglificheskij kompleks Laplandii // Arkheologicheskie otkrytiya 1991–2004 gg. Evropejskaya Rossiya / Red. N.A. Makarov. M.: IA RAN, 2009. S. 95–105.
  21. Bland R. Another Look at the Pegtymel’ Petroglyphs // Arctic Anthropology. 2010. V. 47. № 2. P. 22–31.
  22. Devlet E. Rock Art Studies in Northern Russia and the Far East, 2000–2004 // Rock Art Studies. News of the World III. Oxbow, UK, 2008. P. 120–137.
  23. Devlet E. Rock art studies in Northern Russia and the Far East // Rock art studies. News of the World. IV. Oxbow, UK, 2012. P. 124–148.
  24. Dikov N.N. Mysteries in the Rocks of Ancient Chukotka (Petroglyphs of Pegtymel’). Anchorage: U.S. Dept. of the Interior, National Park Service, Shared Beringian, 1999. 172 p.
  25. Gjerde J.M. Rock Art and Landscapes: Studies of Rock Art from Northern Fennoscandia: Ph.D. diss. Tromsø: UiT the Arctic University of Norway, 2010. 505 p.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate