Везде

ОИФНРоссийская археология

  • ISSN (Print) 0869-6063
  • ISSN (Online)3034-5774

Влияние фискальной и монетарной политики федерального правительства на исход президентской кампании 2016 г.

Вы можете
Код статьи
S207054760013092-8-
DOI
10.18254/S207054760013092-8
Тип публикации
Статья
Статус публикации
Опубликовано
Авторы
Васильев Владимир Сергеевич
Том/ Выпуск
Том / Выпуск № 3
Страницы
0
Аннотация

Анализируется влияние фискальной и монетарной политики федерального правительства США на исход президентских выборов 2016 г. Констатируется, что вялые темпы экономического роста американской экономики в 2016 г. создали для Демократической партии реальную угрозу проигрыша на президентских выборах. Поэтому федеральное правительство прибегло к использованию рычагов бюджетного стимулирования для формирования в сознании американских избирателей тренда ускоряющегося экономического роста. Аналогичным образом действовала и ФРС США, которая намеренно перенесла сроки повышения базовой ставки рефинансирования на период после окончания президентской кампании. Эта тактика администрации Обамы в целом оказалась сравнительно успешной, поскольку позволила демократам получить большую поддержку рядовых избирателей на всеобщих выборах 8 ноября, а также повысить представительство демократических фракций в Сенате и Палате представителей Конгресса США.

Ключевые слова
фискальная политика, экономический рост, норма безработицы, монетарная политика, прогностические модели, президентские выборы
Дата публикации
01.12.2016
Всего подписок
1
Всего просмотров
1523

Библиография

  1. 1. Katz J. Who Will Be President? − «The New York Times», November 8, 2016. − http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/upshot/presidential-polls-forecast.html.
  2. 2. The Cook Political Report. 2016 National Popular Vote Tracker. Updated 12-2-16. − http://cookpolitical.com/story/10174.
  3. 3. PewResearchCenter. Mercer A. 5 key things to know about the margin of error in election polls. September 8, 2016. − http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/09/08/understanding-the-margin-of-error-in-election-polls/
  4. 4. Официальная хронология кризисных потрясений и рецессий в экономике США приведена в: The National Bureau of Economic Research. US Business Cycle Expansions and Contractions. 4/23/2012. − http://www.nber.org/cycles/cyclesmain.pdf.
  5. 5. Рассчитано по: Bureau of Economic Analysis. U.S. Economic Accounts. Interactive Tables: GDP and the National Income and Product Account (NIPA) Historical Tables. Table 1.1.11. Real Gross Domestic Product: Percent Change From Quarter One Year Ago.[Percent]. − http://www.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?ReqID=9&step=1#reqid=9&step=3&isuri=1&903=310.
  6. 6. Bureau of Economic Analysis. U.S. Economic Accounts. Interactive Tables: GDP and the National Income and Product Account (NIPA) Historical Tables. − Table 1.1.1. Percent Change From Preceding Period in Real Gross Domestic Product. [Percent] Seasonally adjusted at annual rates. − http://www.bea.gov/iTable/iTable.cfm?ReqID=9&step=1#reqid=9&step=3&isuri=1&903=1.
  7. 7. Federal Reserve Bank of Allanta. GDPNow. GDP Forecast for April 1, 2016. − https://www.frbatlanta.org/cqer/research/gdpnow/?panel=3.
  8. 8. The White House. Office of the Press Secretary. Readout of the President’s Meeting With Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen. April 11, 2016. − https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/04/11/readout-presidents-meeting-federal-reserve-chair-janet-yellen.
  9. 9. Paul R. What Did Fed Chairman Yellen Tell Obama? April 18, 2016. − http://www.ronpaul.com/2016-04-18/what-did-fed-chairman-yellen-tell-obama/
  10. 10. Bureau of Economic Analysis. Gross Domestic Product: Third Quarter 2016 (Advance Estimate). October 28, 2016. P. 6. − http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/2016/gdp3q16_adv.pdf.
  11. 11. Congressional Budget Office. Monthly Budget Review: Summary For Fiscal Year 2016. November 7, 2016. P. 4. -- https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/114th-congress-2015-2016/reports/52152-mbr.pdf.
  12. 12. Ibidem.
  13. 13. Congressional Budget Office. Topics. Health Care. Projections for Major Health Care Programs for FY 2016. (As of August 2016). − https://www.cbo.gov/topics/health-care.
  14. 14. Congressional Budget Office. Federal Subsidies for Health Insurance Coverage for People Under Age 65: Tables From CBO’s March 2016 Baseline. Table 1. − https://www.cbo.gov/about/products/baseline-projections-selected-programs#6.
  15. 15. Congressional Budget Office. Monthly Budget Review: Summary For Fiscal Year 2016. Op.cit., p. 3.
  16. 16. Ibid., p. 4.
  17. 17. Ibid., p. 1.
  18. 18. Ibid., p. 3.
  19. 19. Ibid., p. 2.
  20. 20. Ibid., p. 3.
  21. 21. Ibid., p.3.
  22. 22. Ibid., p.4.
  23. 23. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Federal Open Market Committee. Press Release. December 16, 2015. − https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20151216a.htm.
  24. 24. Furman. J. Chairman, Council of Economic Advisers. The New View of Fiscal Policy and Its Application. France Stratégie. Paris, France. November 16, 2016. Slides 10-13. − ttps://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/page/files/20161115_furman_francestrategie_fiscalpolicy_cea-slides_0.pdf.
  25. 25. Ibid. Slides 14-22.
  26. 26. The Hamilton Project. Blinder A. Fiscal Policy Reconsidered. Policy Proposal 2016-05. May 2016. P. 22. − http://www.hamiltonproject.org/assets/files/blinder_stabilizers_policy_proposal.pdf.
  27. 27. Ibidem.
  28. 28. Fiscal Year 2017. Historical Tables. Budget of the United States Government. Wash.: US GPO, 2016. Table 3.1—Outlays By Superfunction and Function: 1940–2021.
  29. 29. U.S. Bureau of Census. An Aging World: 2015. International Population Reports. Issued March 2016. P95/16-1. P. 139.− https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2016/demo/p95-16-1.pdf.
  30. 30. U.S. Census Bureau. Projections of the Size and Composition of the U.S. Population: 2014 to 2060. Population Estimates and Projections. Current Population Reports. Issued March 2015. P25-1143. P. 5. − https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2015/demo/p25-1143.pdf.
  31. 31. Hutchins Center on Fiscal and Monetary Policy at Brookings. Elmendorf D., Sheiner L. Federal Budget Policy With An Aging Population and Persistently Low Interest Rates. Hutchins Center Working Paper #18. October 2016. P. 18. − https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/wp18_elmendorf-sheiner_final.pdf.
  32. 32. Lockerbie B. Economic Pessimism and Political Punishment. – «PS: Political Science & Politics», October 2016, p. 675.
  33. 33. Lewis-Beck M. and Tien Ch. The Political Economy Model: 2016 US Election Forecasts. − «PS: Political Science & Politics», October 2016, p. 661.
  34. 34. Erikson R. and Wlezien Ch. Forecasting the Presidential Vote with Leading Economic Indicators and the Polls. − «PS: Political Science & Politics», October 2016, p. 671.
  35. 35. Campbell J. The Trial-Heat and Seats-in-Trouble Forecasts of the 2016 Presidential and Congressional Elections. − «PS: Political Science & Politics», October 2016, p. 665.
  36. 36. Holbrook Th. National Conditions, Trial-heat Polls, and the 2016 Election. − «PS: Political Science & Politics», October 2016, p. 677.
  37. 37. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. FOMC: Press Conference on September 21, 2016. Transcript of Chair Yellen’s Press Conference. PP. 5, 8-10. − https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomcpresconf20160921.pdf.
  38. 38. Ibid., p. 9.
  39. 39. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Money Stock Measures - H.6. December 1, 2016. P. 1. − https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h6/current/default.pdf.
  40. 40. Bureau of Economic Analysis. Gross Domestic Product: Third Quarter 2016 (Second Estimate). Corporate Profits: Third Quarter 2016 (Preliminary Estimate). BEA 16-62. November 29, 2016. − https://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/gdpnewsrelease.pdf.
QR
Перевести

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Высшая аттестационная комиссия

При Министерстве образования и науки Российской Федерации

Scopus

Научная электронная библиотека