- PII
- S207054760013221-0-
- DOI
- 10.18254/S207054760013221-0
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume / Issue 3
- Pages
- 0
- Abstract
The article examines free trade agreements of the US, the dynamics of foreign trade and investment with the partner countries, the structure of exports and imports, the influence on the liberalization and volumes of foreign trade. The impact of the FTAs on the US economy and the preservation of the competitive advantage of the domestic producers is analyzed.
- Keywords
- FTA, export, import, FDI, international competition
- Date of publication
- 01.12.2016
- Year of publication
- 2016
- Number of purchasers
- 1
- Views
- 1677
References
- 1. IMF World Economic Outlook. Globalization: Opportunities and Challenges, 1997, p. 113.
- 2. V mezhvoennyj period i do 1950-kh gg. v SShA srednevzveshennyj tamozhennyj tarif na tovary sostavlyal 40-50%.
- 3. Soglasno dannym Natsional'nogo byuro ehkonomicheskikh issledovanij, v period 1989-2009 gg. pokazateli ehksportnorientirovannykh proizvodstv v SShA byli vyshe sredneotraslevogo pokazatelya bolee chem na 10% po urovnyu zarabotnoj platy i na 30% vyshe po urovnyu proizvoditel'nosti.
- 4. Bradford S., Grieco P., Hufbauer G. The Payoff to America from Global Integration// The United States and the World Economy: Foreign Economic Policy for the Next Decade. Ed. by Bergsten F. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2005, pp. 65-109.
- 5. Zdes' i dalee pokazateli torgovli tovarami i uslugami vzyaty s ehlektronnykh resursov The Bureau of Economic Analysis, accessed at URL: http://www.bea.gov/international/factsheet/ (access date 15.09.2016); The US International Trade Commission, accessed at URL: http://dataweb.usitc.gov (access date 15.09.2016); struktura tovarnogo ehksporta i importa – Jackson J. U.S. Trade with Free Trade Agreement (FTA) Partners. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2016, p.13-26.
- 6. Christopher E. Wilson, Working Together: Economic Ties Between the United States and Mexico. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, November 2011, p. 1-5.
- 7. Villareal M., Fergusson I. NAFTA at 20: Overview and trade effects. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2014, p.24.
- 8. Ibid., p.16.
- 9. SShA v srednem predostavlyaet okolo 20 mlrd. doll. v kachestve subsidij kommercheskim i chastnym predpriyatiyam, a takzhe posrednikam v sfere sel'skogo khozyajstva. Should Washington End Agriculture Subsidies? //WSJ, July 12, 2015. Accessed at URL: http://www.wsj.com/articles/shouldwashingtonendagriculturesubsidies1436757020 (access date 21.09.2016).
- 10. Dogovor vstupil v silu s Sal'vadorom (01.03.2006), Gondurasom (01.04.2006), Nikaragua (01.04.2006), Gvatemaloj (01.07.2006), Dominikanskoj respublikoj (01.03.2007), Kosta-Rikoj (01.01.2009).
- 11. The Open Door of Trade: The Impressive Benefits of America’s Free Trade Agreements. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, 2015, p.4.
- 12. Jackson J. U.S. Trade with Free Trade Agreement (FTA) Partners. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2016, p.13-26.
- 13. Economic Impact of Trade Agreements Implemented Under Trade Authorities Procedures. Washington, DC: United States International Trade Commission, 2016, p. 139-144.
- 14. U.S. Agriculture Benefits from Trade Agreements. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2014. Accessed at URL: http://www.fas.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2014-09/us_ag_benefits_from_trade_agreements.pdf (assess date 20.09.2016).
- 15. Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Likely Impact on the U.S. Economy and on Specific Industry Sectors. Washington, DC: U.S. International Trade Commission, 2016, p. 54-63.
- 16. Ibid., p.21.
- 17. Petri P., Plummer M. The Economic Effects of the Trans-Pacific Partnership: New Estimates. Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2016, p.2.
- 18. Baughman L., Francois J. Failure to Implement the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement: The Cost for American Workers and Companies. Washington, DC: U.S. Chamber of Commerce, 2009, p.4.
