To clarify the concept of "allusion"
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
To clarify the concept of "allusion"
Annotation
PII
S0131-61170000375-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Edition
Pages
37-43
Abstract
Русская речь, To clarify the concept of "allusion"
Number of purchasers
1
Views
502
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Moskvin V.P. Intertekstual'nost': Ponyatijnyj apparat. Figury, zhanry, stili. Izd. 2-e. M., 2012. S. 81–125.

2. Miner E. Allusion // The New Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics / Ed. A. Preminger & T. Brogan. Princeton Univ. Press, 1993. P. 39.

3. Lyons M.A. Marking Innerbiblical Allusion in the Book of Ezekiel // Biblical studies. Vol. 88. 2007. P. 245.

4. Meyer H. Das Zitat in der Erzählkunst. Zur Geschichte und Poetik des europäischen Romans. Stuttgart, 1961. S. 218.

5. Solov'yova M.A. Rol' allyuzivnogo antroponima v sozdanii vertikal'nogo konteksta: Avtoref. diss. … kand. filol. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2004. S. 9.

6. Kukharenko V.A. Interpretatsiya teksta. M., 1988. S. 99.

7. Riffaterre M. Syllepsis // Critical inquiry. Vol. 6. 1980. № 4. P. 627.

8. Beaugrande R.-A., Dressler W. Introduction to text lingustics. London& New York, 1981. P. 188.

9. Warnick B. Rhetoric online: persuasion and politics on the World Wide Web. New York, 2007. P. 94.

10. Riffaterre M. Ukaz. soch. S. 6.

11. Hebel U.J. Towards a Descriptive Poetics of Allusion // Intertextuality. Research in Text Theory / Untersuchungen zur Texttheorie / Ed. H.F. Plett. Vol. 15. Berlin & New York, 1991. P. 143.

12. Kristeva J. Σημειωτική. Recherches pour une sémanalyse. Paris, 1969. P. 84.

13. Puttenham G. The Arte of English Poesie. 1589 / Ed. by E. Arber. London, 1869. P. 234.

14. Galperin I.R. An Experiment in Superlinear Analysis // Language and Stile. Vol. IV. 1971. № 1. P. 57.

15. Miner E. Ukaz. soch. S. 39.

16. Ben-Porat Z. The Poetics of Literary Allusion. P. 107.

17. Pasco A.H. Ukaz. soch. S. XI & 5.

18. Coombs J.H. Allusion defi ned & explained // Poetics. Vol. 13. 1984. № 6. P. 475.

19. Ben-Porat Z. The Poetics of Literary Allusion. P. 110.

20. Galperin I.R. Stylistics. M., 1977. S. 187.

21. Kvyatkovskij A. Poehticheskij slovar'. M., 1966. S. 21.

22. Good J.M., Gregory O., Bosworth N. Pantologia: A new cyclopaedia, comprehending a complete series of essays, treatises, & systems,alphabetically arranged; with a general dictionary of arts, sciences & words. Vol. 1. London, 1813. F. 14 A.

23. Reformatskij A.A. Vvedenie v yazykovedenie. M., 1996. S. 106.

24. Zemskaya E.A. Rechevye priyomy komicheskogo // Issledovaniya po yazyku sovetskikh pisatelej. M., 1959. S. 255.

25. Arnol'd I.V. Stilistika sovremennogo anglijskogo yazyka. M., 1990. S. 103, 104.

26. Lebedeva L.I. Allyuziya // Russkij yazyk: Ehntsiklopediya. M., 1997. S. 25.

27. Cassiodorus Senator. Explanation of the Psalms. New Jersey, 1991. P. 316 & 86.

28. The Cambridge history of literary criticism: The Renaissance. Cambridge Univ. Press, 1989. P. 112.

29. Perri C. Knowing and Playing: The Literary Text and the Trope Allusion // American Imago. Vol. 41. 1984. P. 117–128.

30. Scaliger J.C. Poetices libri septem. Genovae-Lyons, 1561. P. 131.

31. The Oxford English Dictionary: Vols 1–20. Oxford Univ. Press, 1989. Vol. 1. P. 349.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate