Везде
DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIAL PROFILES OF SUBDISCIPLINES IN SOVIET AND RUSSIAN SOCIOLOGY
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIAL PROFILES OF SUBDISCIPLINES IN SOVIET AND RUSSIAN SOCIOLOGY
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000392-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Mikhail Sokolov 
Edition
Volume 377 Issue 9
Pages
49-56
Abstract
In article 1, based on Bourdieu's thoughts, the position of subdisciplines in the field of science is shown as a continuation of the position of their representatives in the social field. The article examines the status and demographic representation of men, degree holders, employees of Metropolitan institutions according to the data of the Soviet sociological Association in 1970 and speakers at the all-Russian sociological Congress in 2008. During the Soviet period, the correlation between the shares of men, doctors of science, and Muscovites was significantly higher in the same specialties. In the post-Soviet period the correlation between the shares of Muscovites and doctors of science is lower. We interpret this data as an indication that the infrastructure of dissertation councils was exported to provincial universities. The concentration of women in the lower ranks is more likely a result of the feminization of the discipline. In the country, sociology is noticeably gender-sensitive; there is a polarization of male and female subspecialties, which was not the case in the Soviet period.
Keywords
history of Russian sociology, Soviet sociology, sociology of science, sociology of sociology
Date of publication
01.09.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
460
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Viner B. Kognitivnaya struktura amerikanskoj sotsiologii i postdiplomnoe sotsiologicheskoeobrazovanie // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noj antropologii. 2010. № 4. S. 97–127.


Knorre A.V., Sokolov M.M. “Tyazhelovesy” rossijskoj sotsiologii: opyt izmereniya statusa iresursov uchenykh // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. № 10. S. 77–87.


Safonova M., Viner B. Setevoj analiz sotsitirovanij ehtnologicheskikh publikatsij v rossijskikh periodicheskikh izdaniyakh: predvaritel'nye rezul'taty // Sotsiologiya: 4M. 2013. № 36.S. 140–176.


Sovetskaya sotsiologicheskaya assotsiatsiya. Informatsionnyj byulleten' № 37 / Pod red. Osipova G.V. Moskva: IKSI AN (Rotaprint), 1970.


Sokolov M. Rynki truda, stratifikatsiya i kar'ery v sovetskoj sotsiologii // Ehkonomicheskayasotsiologiya. 2011. № 12(4). S. 37–72.


Sokolov M., Pogorelov M. Akademicheskie rynki, segmenty professii i intellektual'nyepokoleniya: Fragmentatsiya peterburgskoj sotsiologii // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'nojantropologii. 2005. № 2. S. 76–92.


Bourdieu P. Homo Academicus. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1988.


Cappell C., Guterbock T. Visible Colleges: The Social and Conceptual Structure of Sociology Specialties //American Sociological Review. 1992. № 57(2). R. 266–273.


Douglas M. How Institutions Think. N.Y.: Syracuse University Press, 1986.


Ennis J. The Social Organization of Sociological Knowledge: A Study of Intersection of SociologicalSpecialties // American Sociological Review. 1992. № 57(2). R. 259–265.


Moody J., Light R. A View from Above: The Evolving Sociological Landscape // American Sociologist.2006. № 37. R. 68–86.


Mullins N.C. The Development of Specialties in Social Sciences: The Case of Ethnomethodology //Science Studies. 1973. № 3(3). R. 245–273.


Weeber S. Elite versus Mass Sociology: elaboration on sociology’s academic caste system // AmericanSociologist. 2006. № 37. R. 50–67.


Whitley R. Umbrella and Polytheistic Scientific Disciplines and Their Elites // Social Studies of Science.1976. № 6(3/4). R. 479–491.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate