Везде
YOUTH OUTSIDE EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT: RURAL - URBAN DIFFERENCES IN RUSSIA
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
YOUTH OUTSIDE EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT: RURAL - URBAN DIFFERENCES IN RUSSIA
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000392-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Anna Vyalshina  Tatiana Blinova
Edition
Volume 389 Issue 9
Pages
40-49
Abstract
The paper presents an analysis of the structure and composition of the social group of young people of 16-30 years of age outside education and employment. We show that the researchers’ and government agencies’ interest to the group of NEET-youth is on the rise due to its numerical growth in the developed countries and to the significant economic and social damage from nonparticipation in the labor force. The information base of the study is the results of the Russian monitoring of the economic situation and public health (RLMS-HSE). From the cases of young people, who are (1) searching for a job and (2) those not wishing to work, we identify differences in their employment preferences, work experience, status in the labor market and degree of life satisfaction. We also identify social factors of the differences arising not only from the place of living, but from the adopted patterns of ensuring their own well-being as well. It is shown that if the group of the unemployed is relatively homogenous, and the rural-urban differences are only due to the differentiation of the local labor markets, that of people not wishing to work is considerably differing in the city and the countryside. It is concluded that difference with regard to paid employment is a result of personal-motivational characteristics and individual life situations at certain stages of the life cycle.
Keywords
social groups, NEET-youth, the unemployed, those not wishing to work, satisfaction with life, city, countryside, RLMS
Date of publication
01.09.2016
Number of purchasers
1
Views
478
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Varshavskaya E. Molodezh', isklyuchennaya iz sfery zanyatosti i obrazovaniya, v stranah ES i Ros- sii // Voprosy statistiki. 2015. № 4. S. 40–47.


Varshavskaya E.Ya., Denisenko M.B. Ekonomicheski neaktivnoe naselenie Rossii: chislennost', dinamika, harakteristiki // Sociologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. № 5. S. 42–51.


Gorshkov M.K., Sheregi F.E. Molodezh' Rossii: sociologicheskij portret. M., 2010.


Rossijskij monitoring ekonomicheskogo polozheniya i zdorov'ya naseleniya NIU VShE (RLMSHSE)”, provodimyj NIU VShE i ZAO “Demoskop” pri uchastii Centra narodonaseleniya Universiteta Severnoj Karoliny v Chapel Hille i


Instituta sociologii RAN. URL: http://www. hse .ru/rlms, http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/rlms.


Behrman J., de Hoyos R., Székely M. Out of school and out of work: a conceptual framework for investigating ‘ninis’ in Latin America and the Caribbean. World Bank. Washington, D.C. 2014. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10986/23835 (data obrashcheniya: 21.01.2016).


Bourdieu P. The Forms of Capital // Richardson J. (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press, 1986. P. 241–258.


Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979.


Bronfenbrenner U., Morris P. The ecology of developmental processes // Lerner R.M. (ed.) Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., Vol. 1. R. 993–1028). New York: Wiley, 1998.


Bynner J., Parsons S. Social Exclusion and the Transition from School to Work: the Case of Young People Not in Education, Employment, or Training (NEET) // Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2002. Vol. 60. P. 289–309.


Carcillo S., Fernández R., Königs S., Minea A. NEET Youth in the Aftermath of the Crisis: Challenges and Policies. OECD Social, Employment and Migration // Working Papers. 2015. No. 164.


De Hoyos R., Rogers H., Szekely M. Out of School and Out of Work: Risk and Opportunities for Latin America’s Ninis. World Bank, Washington, DC. 2015. URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org. handle/10986/22349(data obrashcheniya: 18.01.2016).


Furlong A. The zone of precariety and discourses of vulnerability: NEET in the UK. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. 2007. No. 381. P. 101–121.


Genda Y., Maganuma M. NEET: Not Freeters, But Not Unemployed Either. Tokyo, 2004.


Handbook of youth and young adulthood: new perspectives and agendas / ed. by A. Furlong. Routledge. Taylor and Francis Group. London, 2009.


Mirza-Davies J. NEET: Young People Not in Education, Employment or Training. London: House of Commons library, 2014.


Motivation and Barriers to Learning for Young People who are not in Education, Employment or Training // Research paper. 2013. № 87. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, London. URL: https: //gov.uk/government/ organisations/ department-for-business-innovation-skills (data obrashcheniya: 25.09.2015).


Navarrete L. (ed.). Desmontando a ni-ni. Un estereotipo juvenil en tiempos de crisis. Madrid, 2011.


Popham I. Tacking NEETs, Research on Action and Other Factors that san Contribute to a Reduction in the Numbers of Young People Not in Education, Employment or Training (NEET). DfES Publications, Nottingham, 2003.


Yates S., Payne M. Not so NEET? A critique of the use of “NEET” in targeting interventions with young people // Journal of Youth Studies. 2006. Vol. 9(3). P. 329–344.


Youth neither in employment nor education and training (NEET) Presentation of data for the 27 Member States. European Commission, EMCO Contribution, 2011.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate