Везде
THE POTENTIAL OF INTERETHNIC HARMONY: UNDERSTANDING THE CONCEPT AND SOCIAL PRACTICE IN MOSCOW
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
THE POTENTIAL OF INTERETHNIC HARMONY: UNDERSTANDING THE CONCEPT AND SOCIAL PRACTICE IN MOSCOW
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000392-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Leokadiya Drobizheva 
Edition
Volume 379 Issue 11
Pages
80-90
Abstract
The article reveals the content meaning and structure of the concept of “interethnic (interethnic) consent”, which is intended to replace the concept of “tolerance " in official, scientific and public discourses. Based on the research data (autumn 2014, Moscow), the balance of positive and negative interethnic attitudes of Russian and non-Russian residents of the capital is analyzed, the resource potential of interethnic consent in activating integration processes among Muscovites is estimated, and the main sources (factors) of consent are identified. It is concluded that interethnic harmony is achievable only if the national dignity of all the peoples of Russia is respected and their rights and opportunities are equal.
Keywords
interethnic (interethnic) relations, interethnic harmony, interethnic attitudes, interethnic trust, national values, Muscovites, Russians, migrants
Date of publication
01.11.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
517
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Arutyunyan Yu.V. O potentsiale mezhehtnicheskoj integratsii v moskovskom megapolise // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2005. № 1. S. 27–40.


Arutyunyan Yu.V. Moskvichi: ehtnosotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. M.: Nauka, 2007.


Brubejker R. Ehtnichnost' bez grupp / Per. s angl. I. Borisovoj. M.: Izd. dom Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki, 2012.


Vendina O. Mogut li v Moskve vozniknut' ehtnicheskie kvartaly // Vestnik obschestvennogo mneniya. 2004. № 3(71). S. 52–64.


Gellner Eh. Natsii i natsionalizm / Per. s angl. T.V. Brednikovoj, M.K. Tyun'kinoj; red. i poslesl. I.I. Krupnika. M.: Progress, 1991.


Drobizheva L.M. Resurs mezhehtnicheskogo soglasiya i balans neterpimosti v sovremennom rossijskom obschestve // Mir Rossii. 2012. № 4. S. 91–110.


Interv'yu akademika V. Tishkova: «Samoe vazhnoe – ehto chtoby bol'shinstvo grazhdan na vopros “Kto my?” otvechalo: “Prezhde vsego ya rossiyanin”». 2015. 17 marta. URL: http://www.ras.ru/news/shownews.aspx?id=657dd7d4–4aff-4474–8a82–4aa4935a39a0 (data obrascheniya: 19.07.2015).


Interv'yu s professorom Tomasom Lukmanom // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noj antropologii. 2002. T. V. № 4. S. 5–14.


Kozyreva P.M. K voprosu o doverii v trudovykh kollektivakh // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2008. № 11. S. 24–33.


Naselenie Rossii 2010–2011: vosemnadtsatyj–devyatnadtsatyj ezhegodnyj demograficheskij doklad / Otv. red. A.G. Vishnevskij. M.: Izdatel'skij dom NIU VShEh, 2013.


Obschestvennoe mnenie – 2013: ezhegodnik. M.: Levada-Tsentr, 2013.


Obschestvennoe mnenie – 2014: ezhegodnik. M.: Levada-Tsentr, 2014.


Pain Eh.A. Ehtnopoliticheskij mayatnik. M.: Institut sotsiologii RAN, 2004.


Resurs mezhehtnicheskogo soglasiya v Moskve [Ehlektronnyj resurs] / Ruk. proekta i otv. red. L.M. Drobizheva. M.: Institut sotsiologii RAN, 2014. URL: http://www.isras.ru/files/File/publ/inab_2014_2(1).pdf (data obrascheniya: 25.07.2015).


Rustamova F. V Rossii otsenili posledstviya vozvrascheniya bojtsov-natsionalistov iz Donbassa // RBK. 2014. 29 dekabrya. URL: http://top.rbc.ru/politics/29/12/2014/54a132b49a794704b5fe660e(data obrascheniya: 25.07.2015).


Sotsial'noe neravenstvo ehtnicheskikh grupp: predstavlenie i real'nost' / Avt. proekta i otv. red. L.M. Drobizheva. M.: Academia, 2002.


Tishkov V.A. Ocherki teorii i politiki ehtnichnosti. M.: Russkij mir, 1997.


Toschenko Zh.T. Fantomy rossijskogo obschestva. M.: Tsentr sotsial'nogo prognozirovaniya i marketinga, 2015.


Uoltser M. O terpimosti: lektsii po ehtike, politike i ehkonomike / Per. s angl. I. Myurnberg. M.: Ideya-Press; Dom intellektual'noj knigi, 2000.


Uchastnikov “Russkogo marsha”, kotorye prishli s “nepravil'nymi plakatami”, prigovorili k shtrafu v tysyachu rublej za melkoe khuliganstvo // Newsru.com. 2014. 5 noyabrya. URL: http://newsru.com/arch/russia/05nov2014/melkoe.html (data obrascheniya: 25.07.2015).


FSO: Luchshe vsekh mezhnatsional'nymi otnosheniyami zanimayutsya v Chechne, na poslednem meste Moskva // Natsional'nyj aktsent. 2015. 19 fevralya. URL: http://nazaccent.ru/content/14916-monitoring-luchshe-vsego-mezhnacionalnymi-otnosheniyami-zanimayutsya.html (data obrascheniya: 26.07.2015).


Khobsbaum Eh. Natsii i natsionalizm posle 1780 g. SPb.: Aletejya, 1998.


Khomyakov M.B. Teoreticheskoe osmyslenie problem tolerantnosti // Sotsiologiya mezhehtnicheskoj tolerantnosti / Otv. red. L.M. Drobizheva. M.: Izd-vo Instituta sotsiologii RAN, 2003. S. 13–30.


Ehrikson Eh. Identichnost': yunost' i krizis / Per. s angl.; obsch. red. i predisl. A.V. Tolstykh. M.: Izdatel'skaya gruppa “Progress”, 1996.


Brass P. Ethnicity and Nationalism: Theory and Comparison. New Delhi; Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991.


Deutsch K. Nationalism and Social Sommunication: An Inquiry into Foundations of Nationality. Cambridge, MA.: The M.I.T. Press, 1966.


Ethnic Identity: Cultural Continuities and Change / Ed. by G. de Vos, L. Romanucci-Ross. Palo Alto: Mayfild Publishing, 1975.


Furnham E., Bochner C. Culture Shock: Psychological Reactions to Unfamiliar Environments. L.; N.Y.: Methuen, 1986.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate