Везде
MODEL OF CORRUPT BEHAVIOR IN THE BUREAUCRATIC HIERARCHY: EXPERIMENTAL RESULT
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
MODEL OF CORRUPT BEHAVIOR IN THE BUREAUCRATIC HIERARCHY: EXPERIMENTAL RESULT
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000460-2-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Dmitriy Zenyuk  Dmitriy Faller Georgii Malinetskiy
ORCID: 0000-0001-6041-1926
Edition
Volume 366 Issue 10
Pages
76-84
Abstract
Possible approaches to describing the main mechanisms of corruption behavior are considered. A conceptual model of their study and its mathematical formalization are proposed. The results of a computational experiment are presented, which allow us to draw a conclusion about the effectiveness of variousanti-corruption strategies.
Keywords
коррупционное поведение, математическая модель, бюрократическая иерархия, самоорганизация, имитационное моделирование, теория графов
Date of publication
01.10.2014
Number of purchasers
1
Views
502
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Vybornov R.A. Modeli i metody upravleniya organizatsionnymi strukturami s korruptsionnym povedeniem uchastnikov. M.: IPU RAN, 2006.


Zenyuk D.A., Malinetskij G.G., Faller D.S. Sotsial'naya model' korruptsii v ierarkhicheskikh strukturakh // Preprinty IPM im M.V.Keldysha. 2013. № 87. S. 27.


Istoriya Drevnego Vostoka. Zarozhdenie drevnejshikh klassovykh obschestv i pervye ochagi rabovladel'cheskoj tsivilizatsii. Chast' 1. Mesopotamiya / pod red. I.M. D'yakonova. M.: Nauka. Glavnaya redaktsiya vostochnoj literatury, 1983.


Konventsiya o grazhdansko-pravovoj otvetstvennosti za korruptsiyu. Sovet Evropy. Seriya Evropejskikh dogovorov. № 174. Strasburg, 1999.


Konventsiya Organizatsii ob'edinennykh natsijprotiv korruptsii. N'yu-J ork: OON, 2004.


Konventsiya ob ugolovnoj otvetstvennosti za korruptsiyu. Sovet Evropy. Seriya Evropejskikh dogovorov. № 173. Strasburg, 1999.


Mikhajlov A.P. Modelirovanie korrumpirovannykh vlastnykh ierarkhij // Matematicheskoe modelirovanie. 1994. T. 6. № 6. S. 108–138.


Rossijskaya Federatsiya. Zakony. O protivodejstvii korruptsii: feder. zakon: prinyat Gosudarstvennoj dumoj 19 dekabrya 2008 g.: odobren Sovetom Federatsii 22 dekabrya 2008 g. // Rossijskaya gazeta. 2008. 30 dekabrya. № 4823.


Rouz-Akkerman S. Korruptsiya i gosudarstvo. Prichiny, sledstviya, reformy. M.: Logos, 2003.


Ades A., DiTella R. Rents, competition, and corruption // American Economic Review. 1999. Vol. 89. № 4. P. 982–993.


Axelrod R. The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books, 2004. 261 p.


Bardhan P. Corruption and development: a review of issues // Journal of Economic Literature. 1997. Vol. 35. № 3. P. 1320–1346.


Cadot O. Corruption as a Gamble // Journal of Political Economy. 1987. Vol. 33. № 2. P. 223–244.


Chander P., Wilde L. Corruption in Tax Administration // Journal of Political Economy. 1992. Vol. 49. № 3. P. 333–349.


Huntington S.P. Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968. 488 p.


Jain A.K. Corruption: a review // Journal of economic surveys. 2001. Vol. 15. № 1. P. 71–121.


Leff N.H. Economic development through bureaucratic corruption // American Behavioral Scientist. 1964. Vol. 8. № 3. P. 8–14.


Lui F.T. An Equilibrium Queuing Model of Bribery // Journal of Political Economy. 1985. P. 760–781.


Mauro P. Corruption and growth // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1995. Vol. 110. № 3. P. 681–712.


Pellegrini L. Economic analysis of corruption // Corruption, development and the environment. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011. P. 13–27.


Rinaldi S., Feichtinger G., Wirl F. Corruption dynamics in democratic societies // Complexity. 1998. Vol. 3. № 5. P. 53–64.


Rose-Ackerman S. The economics of corruption // Journal of public economics. 1975. Vol. 4. № 2. P. 187–203.


Shleifer A., Vishny R.W. Corruption // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1993. Vol. 110. № 3. P. 599–617.


Tirole J.A. Theory of collective reputations (with applications to the persistence of corruption and to firm quality) // The Review of Economic Studies. 1996. Vol. 63. № 1. P. 1–22.


Wirl F. Socio-economic typologies of bureaucratic corruption and implications // Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 1998. Vol. 8. № 2. P. 199–220.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate