Везде
ON THE APPLICATION OF THE BUSINESS MODEL IN HIGHER EDUCATION
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
ON THE APPLICATION OF THE BUSINESS MODEL IN HIGHER EDUCATION
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000525-3-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Madeleine Block  Samuil Kugel' Tatiana Khvatova
Edition
Volume 366 Issue 10
Pages
106-116
Abstract
This article analyzes the state of higher education from various perspectives: universities, teachers, researchers, organizations, and public opinion. Particular attention is paid to the increasing complexity in the relationship between universities and their stakeholders, 1 and the principles of new Public Management (NPM), which are rapidly being implemented in the academic environment. The ratings of universities and scientific journals in Russia and Germany are studied and compared. Attention is drawn to goals and control, responsibility and ethics in the new business model for higher education and the transformation of universities from relatively independent oases of science and public education to business-oriented knowledge generators with an increasing share of self-financing.
Keywords
business model, education, University, public administration, ratings
Date of publication
01.10.2014
Number of purchasers
1
Views
509
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Vinogradov D. Dissergejt. Odin den' s okhotnikami na lipovye dissertatsii // RIA Novosti 2013. URL: http://ria.ru/ocherki/20130305/925877298.html#ixzz2masEZPEJ (data obrascheniya: 5.03.2013).


Eliseeva I.I. Nekotorye aspekty sistemy vysshego obrazovaniya v Rossii // Problemy deyatel'nosti uchenogo i nauchnykh kollektivov. Mezhdunar. ezheg. / Pod red. S.A. Kugelya. Mat. XXVIII sessii Mezhdun. shkoly sotsiologii nauki i tekhniki. 2013. Vypusk 29. S. 245–251.


Zborovskij G.E. Uroki neudavshejsya modernizatsii obrazovaniya // Sotsial'naya strategiya rossijskoj sistemy obrazovaniya: materialy Mezhdunar. nauchn. konf. “Tret'i Sankt-Peterburgskie sotsiologicheskie chteniya”. Sankt-Peterburg, 14–15 aprelya 2011. S. 39–44.


Ivanov D.V. Vysshee obrazovanie v usloviyakh glehm-kapitalizma: kul'turnyj kapital ili vtoraya gramotnost'? // Problemy deyatel'nosti uchenogo i nauchnykh kollektivov: Mezhdunarodnyj ezhegodnik Vyp. XXIX. Mat. XXVIII sessii


Mezhdunar. shkoly sotsiologii nauki i tekhniki / Pod red. S.A. Kugelya. 2013. C. 228–232.


Nauchnye kadry SSSR: dinamika i struktura / Pod red. V.Zh. Kelle, S.A. Kugelya. M.: “Mysl'”, 1991.


Kuz'minov Ya. Nepriyatnye rejtingi nam vdvojne polezny. Interv'yu dlya “Lenta.ru” ot 23.12.2013. URL: http://www.hse.ru/news/1163613/107290102.html (data obrascheniya: 28.12.2013).


Mukhametshina E. Vuzy projdut estestvennyj otbor. 2013. URL: http://www.gazeta.ru/social/2013/07/05/5414341.shtml (data obrascheniya: 5.07.2013).


Programma SPbGPU “5-100-2020”. 2013. URL: http://www.spbstu.ru/f2h/index.asp. (data obrascheniya: 22.05.2014).


Shekhter M. Tseli i zadachi vysshego obrazovaniya v sovremennykh usloviyakh. // Mat. Sibirskogo psikhologicheskogo foruma. Tomsk: TomGU, 2004. S. 856–861.


Arnold N. Was bedeutet “Wissensgesellschaft”? Herausforderungen und Ziele. Analyse & Argumente 112. 2012. URL: http://www.kas.de/wf/doc/kas_32647-544-1-30.pdf?130318140647 (data obrascheniya: 23.05.2014).


Brunsson N., Sahlin-Andersson K. Constructing Organizations: The Example of Public Sector Reform // Organization Studies. 2000. Vol. 21. No. 4. P. 721–746.


Cheung W.W.L. The economics of post-doc-publishing // Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics. 2008. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 41–44.


Doerre K., Lessenich S., Singe I. German Sociologists Boycott Academic Ranking, 2013. URL: http://www.riaipe-alfa.eu/index.php/en/news/1804-sociologos-alemaes-fazem-boicote-ao-rankingacademico (data obrascheniya: 30.12.2013).


Garfield E. Journal impact factor: a brief review // CMAJ. 1999. Vol. 161. P. 979–980.


Marginson S. University Rankings, in Prospects of Higher Education: Globalization, Market Competition, Public Goods and the Future of the University, Sense Publishers: Rotterdam: 2007.


Marginson S. Academic creativity under new public management: foundation for an investigation // Educational theory. 2008. Vol. 58. No. 3. P. 269–287.


Mikkonen A., Rotko R. AMK (Ammattikorkeakoulut) Talouselama 2013 // Journal of Economy. 2013. P. 29–35.


Miller J.P. The Holistic Curriculum. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education Press: 1998.


Osterwalder A. The business model ontology. A proposition in a design science approach. Dissertation, Universite de Lausanne, Ecole des hautes etudes commerciales: 2004.


Osterwalder A., Pigneur Y., Tucci C. Clarifying business models: Origins, present and future of the concept // Communications of AIS. 2005. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 751–775.


Rubin B. University Business Models and Online Practices: A Third Way // Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. 2013. Vol. 5. No. 1. URL: http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring161/rubin.html (data obrascheniya: 25.12.2013).


Stergiou K.I., Lessenich S. On impact factors and university rankings: from birth to boycott // Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics. 2013. Vol. 13. P. 1–11.


Wissema J. Towards the Third Generation University, Managing university in transition, Edward Elgar: 2009.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate