Библиография

Дополнительные библиографические источники и материалы

Мягков А.Ю. Техника “рандомизированного ответа”: Опыт полевого тестирования // Социол. журнал. 2002. № 4. C. 60–77.
Мягков А.Ю. Искренность респондентов в сенситивных опросах: Методы диагностики и стимулирования. Иваново, 2007.
Мягков А.Ю., Журавлева С.Л. Повышение качества данных в телефонном интервью: Методология и методы. Иваново, 2010.
Мягков А.Ю., Журавлева С.Л., Прокофьев Е.Н. Модель “вынужденного ответа”: Экспериментальная оценка эффективности // Социология: 4 М. 2010. № 30. С. 64–88.
Beldt S.F., Daniel W.W., Garsha B.S. The Takahasi–Sakasegawa randomized response technique: A field test // Sociological Methods and Research. 1982. Vol. 11. № 1. Р. 101–111.
Berman J., McCombs H., Boruch R. Notes on the contamination method: Two small experiments assuring confidentiality of responses // Sociological Methods and Research. 1977. Vol. 6. № 1. Р. 45–62.
Boruch R.F. Assuring confidentiality of responses in social research: A note on strategies // The American Sociologist. 1971. Vol. 6. № 3. Р. 308–311.
Boruch R.F. Relations among statistical methods for assuring confidentiality of social research data // Social Science Research. 1972. Vol. 1. № 3. Р. 403–414.
Chaudhuri A. Randomized Response and Indirect Questioning Techniques in Surveys. Boca Raton, Fl.: Сhapman & Hall, CRC Press, 2011.
Сoutts E., Jann B. Sensitive questions in online surveys: Experimental results for the randomized response technique (RRT) and the unmatched count technique (UCT) // Sociological Methods and Research. 2011. Vol. 40. № 1. Р. 169–193.
De Jong M.G., Pieters R., Fox J.-P. Reducing social desirability bias through item randomized response: An application to measure underreported desires // Journal of Marketing Research. 2010. Vol. XLVII. № 1. Р. 14–27.
Greenberg B.G., Abul-Ela A-L.A., Simmons W.R., Horvitz D.G. The unrelated question randomized response model theoretical framework // Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1969. Vol. 64. № 326. Р. 520–539.
Greenberg B.G., Kuebler R.R., Abernathy J.R.Jr., Horvitz D.G. Application of the randomized response technique in obtaining quantitative data // Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1971. Vol. 66. № 334. Р. 243–250.
Heijden van der P.J.M., Gils, van G., Bouts J., Hox J.J. A comparison of randomized response, computerassisted self-interview, and face-to-face direct questioning: Eliciting sensitive information in the context of welfare and unemployment benefit // Sociological Methods and Research. 2000. Vol. 28.
№ 4. Р. 505–537.
Holbrook A.L., Krosnick J.A. (a) Social desirability bias in voter turnout reports: Tests using the item count technique // Public Opinion Quarterly. 2010. Vol. 74. № 1. Р. 37–67.
Holbrook A.L., Krosnick J.A. (b) Measuring voter turnout by using the randomized response technique: Evidence calling into question the method’s validity // Public Opinion Quarterly. 2010. Vol. 74. № 2. Р. 328–343.
Jones E.E., Sigall H. The bogus pipeline: A new paradigm for measuring affect and attitude // Psychological Bulletin. 1971. Vol. 76. № 5. Р. 349–364.
Lara D., Garcia S.G., Ellertson Ch. et al. The measure of induced abortion levels in Mexico using random response technique // Sociological Methods and Research. 2006. Vol. 35. № 2. Р. 279–301.
Lensvelt-Mulders G.J.L.M., Hox J.J., Heijden van der P.J.M., Maas C. (a) Meta-analysis of randomized response research: Thirty-five years of validation // Sociological Methods and Research. 2005. Vol. 33. № 3. Р. 319–348.
Lensvelt-Mulders G.J.L.M., Hox J.J., Hejden van der P.J.M. (b) How to improve the efficiency of randomized response designs // Quality and Quantity. 2005. Vol. 39. № 2. Р. 253–265.
Moriarty M., Wiseman F. On the choice of a randomization technique with the randomized response model // Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association. Washington, DC: American Statistical Association, 1976. Р. 624–626.
Orwin R.G., Boruch R.F. RRT meets RDD: Statistical strategies for assuring response privacy in telephone surveys // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1982. Vol. 46. № 4. Р. 561–562.
Raghavarao D., Federer W.T. Application of BIB Designs: An Alternative to the Randomized Response Method in Survey Sampling. Mimeograph Series. Ithaca: Biometrics Unit, Cornell Univ. Press, 1973.
Reinmuth J.E., Geurts M.D. The collection of sensitive information using a two-stage, randomized response model // Journal of Marketing Research. 1975. Vol. XII. № 4. Р. 402–407.
Stem D.E., Steinhorst R.К. Telephone interview and mail questionnaire applications of the randomized response model // Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1984. Vol. 79. № 387. Р. 555–564.
Swensson B. Combined Questions: An Alternative Data-Gathering Device to Randomized Response for Sensitive Questions // Personal Integrity and the Need for Data in the Social Sciences: Proceedings of a Symposium / Swedish Council for Social Science Research. Stoсkholm, 1976.
Takahasi K., Sakasegawa H. A randomized response technique without making use of any randomizing device // Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics. 1977. Vol. 29. № 1. Р. 1–8.
Warner S.L. Randomized response: A survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias // Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1965. Vol. 60. № 309. Р. 63–69.
Warner S. The omitted digit randomized response model for telephone applications [online]. P. 441–443.
URL: http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/proceedings/ papers/1986_082.pdf. (дата обращения: 03.09.2009).
Weissman A. Randomized Response Versus Direct Questioning: Two Methods for Asking Sensitive Questions Over the Telephone. Paper presented at the American educational research association meeting. Los Angeles, Calif., 1981.