References

Additional sources and materials

Myagkov A.Yu. Tekhnika “randomizirovannogo otveta”: Opyt polevogo testirovaniya // Sotsiol. zhurnal. 2002. № 4. C. 60–77.
 Myagkov A.Yu. Iskrennost' respondentov v sensitivnykh oprosakh: Metody diagnostiki i stimulirovaniya. Ivanovo, 2007.
 Myagkov A.Yu., Zhuravleva S.L. Povyshenie kachestva dannykh v telefonnom interv'yu: Metodologiya i metody. Ivanovo, 2010.
 Myagkov A.Yu., Zhuravleva S.L., Prokof'ev E.N. Model' “vynuzhdennogo otveta”: Ehksperimental'naya otsenka ehffektivnosti // Sotsiologiya: 4 M. 2010. № 30. S. 64–88.
 Beldt S.F., Daniel W.W., Garsha B.S. The Takahasi–Sakasegawa randomized response technique: A field test // Sociological Methods and Research. 1982. Vol. 11. № 1. R. 101–111.
 Berman J., McCombs H., Boruch R. Notes on the contamination method: Two small experiments assuring confidentiality of responses // Sociological Methods and Research. 1977. Vol. 6. № 1. R. 45–62.
 Boruch R.F. Assuring confidentiality of responses in social research: A note on strategies // The American Sociologist. 1971. Vol. 6. № 3. R. 308–311.
 Boruch R.F. Relations among statistical methods for assuring confidentiality of social research data // Social Science Research. 1972. Vol. 1. № 3. R. 403–414.
 Chaudhuri A. Randomized Response and Indirect Questioning Techniques in Surveys. Boca Raton, Fl.: Shapman & Hall, CRC Press, 2011.
 Soutts E., Jann B. Sensitive questions in online surveys: Experimental results for the randomized response technique (RRT) and the unmatched count technique (UCT) // Sociological Methods and Research. 2011. Vol. 40. № 1. R. 169–193.
 De Jong M.G., Pieters R., Fox J.-P. Reducing social desirability bias through item randomized response: An application to measure underreported desires // Journal of Marketing Research. 2010. Vol. XLVII. № 1. R. 14–27.
 Greenberg B.G., Abul-Ela A-L.A., Simmons W.R., Horvitz D.G. The unrelated question randomized response model theoretical framework // Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1969. Vol. 64. № 326. R. 520–539.
 Greenberg B.G., Kuebler R.R., Abernathy J.R.Jr., Horvitz D.G. Application of the randomized response technique in obtaining quantitative data // Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1971. Vol. 66. № 334. R. 243–250.
 Heijden van der P.J.M., Gils, van G., Bouts J., Hox J.J. A comparison of randomized response, computerassisted self-interview, and face-to-face direct questioning: Eliciting sensitive information in the context of welfare and unemployment benefit // Sociological Methods and Research. 2000. Vol. 28.
 № 4. R. 505–537.
 Holbrook A.L., Krosnick J.A. (a) Social desirability bias in voter turnout reports: Tests using the item count technique // Public Opinion Quarterly. 2010. Vol. 74. № 1. R. 37–67.
 Holbrook A.L., Krosnick J.A. (b) Measuring voter turnout by using the randomized response technique: Evidence calling into question the method’s validity // Public Opinion Quarterly. 2010. Vol. 74. № 2. R. 328–343.
 Jones E.E., Sigall H. The bogus pipeline: A new paradigm for measuring affect and attitude // Psychological Bulletin. 1971. Vol. 76. № 5. R. 349–364.
 Lara D., Garcia S.G., Ellertson Ch. et al. The measure of induced abortion levels in Mexico using random response technique // Sociological Methods and Research. 2006. Vol. 35. № 2. R. 279–301.
 Lensvelt-Mulders G.J.L.M., Hox J.J., Heijden van der P.J.M., Maas C. (a) Meta-analysis of randomized response research: Thirty-five years of validation // Sociological Methods and Research. 2005. Vol. 33. № 3. R. 319–348.
 Lensvelt-Mulders G.J.L.M., Hox J.J., Hejden van der P.J.M. (b) How to improve the efficiency of randomized response designs // Quality and Quantity. 2005. Vol. 39. № 2. R. 253–265.
 Moriarty M., Wiseman F. On the choice of a randomization technique with the randomized response model // Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section of the American Statistical Association. Washington, DC: American Statistical Association, 1976. R. 624–626.
 Orwin R.G., Boruch R.F. RRT meets RDD: Statistical strategies for assuring response privacy in telephone surveys // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1982. Vol. 46. № 4. R. 561–562.
 Raghavarao D., Federer W.T. Application of BIB Designs: An Alternative to the Randomized Response Method in Survey Sampling. Mimeograph Series. Ithaca: Biometrics Unit, Cornell Univ. Press, 1973.
 Reinmuth J.E., Geurts M.D. The collection of sensitive information using a two-stage, randomized response model // Journal of Marketing Research. 1975. Vol. XII. № 4. R. 402–407.
 Stem D.E., Steinhorst R.K. Telephone interview and mail questionnaire applications of the randomized response model // Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1984. Vol. 79. № 387. R. 555–564.
 Swensson B. Combined Questions: An Alternative Data-Gathering Device to Randomized Response for Sensitive Questions // Personal Integrity and the Need for Data in the Social Sciences: Proceedings of a Symposium / Swedish Council for Social Science Research. Stoskholm, 1976.
 Takahasi K., Sakasegawa H. A randomized response technique without making use of any randomizing device // Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics. 1977. Vol. 29. № 1. R. 1–8.
 Warner S.L. Randomized response: A survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias // Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1965. Vol. 60. № 309. R. 63–69.
 Warner S. The omitted digit randomized response model for telephone applications [online]. P. 441–443.
 URL: http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/proceedings/ papers/1986_082.pdf. (data obrascheniya: 03.09.2009).
 Weissman A. Randomized Response Versus Direct Questioning: Two Methods for Asking Sensitive Questions Over the Telephone. Paper presented at the American educational research association meeting. Los Angeles, Calif., 1981.