Везде
The nascent mass society ideology: Stepun vs Gorky in defense of Dostoyevsky
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
The nascent mass society ideology: Stepun vs Gorky in defense of Dostoyevsky
Annotation
PII
S0236-20070000392-2-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Vladimir K. Kantor 
Edition
Issue 1
Pages
37-44
Abstract
One of the most interesting debates in pre-revolution Russia is considered, that is the debate between F. Stepun and M. Gorky about F. Dostoyevsky. According to Stepun, it’s the metaphysics of tragedy that Gorky failed to discern in the works by Dostoevsky. It is shown that Gorky did reflect the affitude of the nascent mass society that did not want to see the tragic aspect of life and so aligned themselves with those who represented authoritarian principle, such as Bolsheviks and Nazi. It’s indicative that Gorky was backed by Lenin and other bolshevist publicists.
Keywords
DOSTOYEVSKY, STEPUN, GORKY, LENIN, TRAGEDY, MASS SOCIETY, BOLSHAVISM
Date of publication
01.02.2017
Number of purchasers
4
Views
1113
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

    

  1. Artsybashev M.P. Maksim Gor'kij // Rampa i zhizn'. 1913. № 39. 29 sentyabrya. S. 10-11.
    2. 

  2. Gor'kij M. O "karamazovschine"(URL: http://dugward.ru/library/dostoevskiy/gorkiy_o_karamazovchine.html)
    3. 

  3. Ivanov Vyach. Dostoevskij i roman-tragediya // Ivanov Vyach. Rodnoe i vselenskoe. M.: Respublika, 1994. S. 283.
    4. 

  4. Kamyu A. Mif o Sizife. Absurdnoe tvorchestvo // Kamyu A. Postoronnij. Mif o Sizife. Nedorazumenie. M.: AST, 2007. S. 215-216.
    5. 

  5. Kantor V.K. Karnaval i besovschina // Vopr. filosofii. 1997. № 5. C. 44-57.
    6. 

  6. Lenin V.I. P.S.S. Izd. 5-e. T 48. S. 226.
    7. 

  7. Merezhkovskij D.S. Gor'kij i Dostoevskij // Merezhkovskij D.S. Akropol': Izbr. lit.-kritich. stat'i. M.: Knizhnaya palata, 1991. S. 38.
    8. 

  8. Ol'minskij M. Po literaturnym voprosam. M.; L., 1932. S. 25-26.
    9. 

  9. Stepun. F.A. O "Besakh" Dostoevskogo i pis'makh Maksima Gor'kogo // Stepun F.A. Soch. M.: ROSSPEhN, 2000. S. 837.
    10. 

  10. Trubetskoj Evg. Dva zverya // Trubetskoj Evg. Smysl zhizni. M.: Respublika, 1994. S. 318.
    11. 

  11. Ajssel' S. Sovremennaya psikhoantropologiya. Osnovy ucheniya / Per. s fr. M.: Svet, 2015. 160 s.
    12. 

  12. Antonovskij A.Yu. Kommunikativnaya filosofiya znaniya: Ot teorii kommunikativnykh media k sotsial'noj filosofii nauki. M.: In-t filosofii RAN, 2015. 168 s.
    13. 

  13. Babai A.A., Kija G.A., Rukhani R.M. Metodologiya tolkovaniya Korana / Per. s arab. M.: Sandra, 2016. 700 s.
    14. 

  14. Berton R. Razum VS Mozg. Razgovor na raznykh yazykakh / Per. s angl. M.: Ehksmo, 2016. 304 s.
    15. 

  15. Bichev G.N. Sbornik statej "Ratsional'naya sistema mirovozzreniya - osnova sovremennykh ideologij". M.: IM Lapchenko A.B., 2015. 104 s.
    16. 

  16. Bulyubash I.D., Pugach N.V. Rukovodstvo po obucheniyu geshtal't-terapevtov. Samara: Bakhrakh-M, 2016. 416 s.
    17. 

  17. Veryaskina V.P. Transformatsiya cheloveka v obschestve moderna. M.: In-t filosofii RAN, 2015. 223 s.
    18. 

  18. Vetoshkin A.P., Nekrasov S.I., Nekrasova N.A. Filosofiya: Uchebnik dlya studentov vuzov. M.: Prospekt, 2016. 560 s.
    19.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate