Везде
THE TRIAL OF VESTALS: POLITICAL ASPECT
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
THE TRIAL OF VESTALS: POLITICAL ASPECT
Annotation
PII
S0321-03910000375-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Olga Lyubimova 
Edition
Issue 3 (294)
Pages
45-69
Abstract

The article deals with several procedural issues concerning the trial of the Vestals in 73 B.C. (the date of Crassus’ praetorship and the possibility of prosecuting a praetor in the pontifical court; the problem of two acquittals of Catilina; the meaning of Clodius’ speech). The political aspect of the trial is also analyzed. It is observed that there must have been some quite weighty evidence against the Vestals and that the verdict of conviction in the pontifical court would have led to the capital punishment of the accused, not to the exile as was the case in criminal courts of the Late Roman Republic. The author advances the hypothesis that the accusation of the Vestals and their alleged lovers was initiated by Pompey through his adherents Plotius and Clodius. Pompey had the reasons to expect that Crassus, praetor in 73, would try to restore the powers of tribunate, and he sought to prevent Crassus from doing that because he wanted to profit from passing this law himself. The indictment of Fabia and Catilina was aimed at drawing additional public attention to the trial of the Vestals and at increasing the danger for Crassus.

Keywords
trial of the Vestals, Pompey, Late Roman Republic, pontifi cal courts, Crassus
Date of publication
01.07.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
579
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Borovkov P.S. 2009: Kollegiya pontifikov v politiko-pravovoj strukture rimskoj civitas (ot Tsarskogo perioda do kontsa Klassicheskoj respubliki). Dis. … kand. ist. nauk. Ekaterinburg.
 Bugaeva N.V. 2010: Sudebnyj protsess 73 g. do n.eh. v «Istorii protiv yazychnikov» Oroziya // Vostok, Evropa, Amerika v drevnosti. Sbornik nauchnykh dokladov XVI Sergeevskikh chtenij. M., 205–212.
 Korolenkov A.V. 2009: Marij i Katul: istoriya vzaimootnoshenij homo novus i vir nobilissimus // «Antichnyj mir i arkheologiya». Vyp. 13. Saratov, 214–224.
 Lyubimova O.V. 2013a: Mark Litsinij Krass i plebejskie tribuny 70-kh godov I v. do n.eh. // VDI. 2, 148–157.
 Lyubimova O.V. 2013b: Pis'mo Krassa o vyzove Pompeya i M. Lukulla protiv Spartaka: vremya i obstoyatel'stva napisaniya // Vestnik Gumanitarnogo universiteta. 2 (2), 73–84.
 Lyubimova O.V. 2013v: Konflikt Krassa i Pompeya v 70 g. do n. eh.: ego zarozhdenie i prichiny // Studia Historica. 13. M., 137–157
 Lyubimova O.V. 2014: Protsess vestalok v 73 g. do n.eh.: sud prisyazhnykh ili sud pontifikov? // Antiquitas Aeterna. 4. Nizhnij Novgorod, 211–234.
 Smirnova O.P. 1997: Kul't Vesty v Drevnem Rime (VIII v. do n. eh. – IV v. n.eh.). Dis. … kand. ist. nauk. M.
 Smorchkov A.M., Kofanov L.L. 2001: Kollegiya vestalok // Zhrecheskie kollegii v rannem Rime. K voprosu o stanovlenii rimskogo sakral'nogo i publichnogo prava / L.L. Kofanov (otv. red.). M., 287–298.
 Smyshlyaev A.L. 2008: «Dobrye nravy» i «surovye zakony» v rimskom sude // Ius antiquum. Drevnee pravo. 2 (22), 76–95.
 Tsirkin Yu.B. 2005: Kvint Kassij i grazhdanskaya vojna v Ispanii // VDI. 3, 222–235.
 Alexander M.C. 1990: Trials in the Late Roman Republic, 149 BC to 50 BC. Toronto–Buffalo–
 Astin A. 1957: The Lex Annalis before Sulla // Latomus. 16, 588–613.
 Bauman R.A. 1992: Women and Politics in Ancient Rome. L.–N.Y.
 Bauman R.A. 1996: Crime and Punishment in Ancient Rome. L.–N.Y.
 Bauman R.A. 2000: Human Rights in Ancient Rome. L.–N.Y.
 Brennan T.C. 2000: The Praetorship in the Roman Republic. Oxf.
 Broughton T.R.S. 1951: The Magistrates of the Roman Republic. Vol. II. N.Y.
 Broughton T.R.S. 1986: The Magistrates of the Roman Republic. Vol. III. Supplement. Atlanta.
 Brunt P.A. 1971: Italian Manpower 225 B.C. – A.D. 14. Oxf.
 Cadoux T.J. 2005: Catiline and the Vestal Virgins // Historia. 54, 162–179.
 Cornell T. 1981: Some observations on the «crimen incesti» // Le délit religieux dans la cité antique. Actes de la table ronde de Rome (6–7 avril 1978). Rome. 27–37.
 Drumann W. 1964: Geschichte Roms in seinem Übergange von der republikanischen zur monarchischen Verfassung oder Pompeius, Caesar, Cicero und ihre Zeitgenossen / Bd 3. 2 Aufl. P. Groebe (Hrsg.). Hildesheim.
 Epstein D.F. 1986: Cicero's Testimony at the Bona Dea Trial // CPh. 81, 229–235.
 Evans R. 2014: Pompey’s Consulships: The End of Electoral Competition in the Late Roman Republic // URL: https://www.academia.edu/6252270 (Ehlektronnyj resurs) (data obrascheniya: 24.08.2014).
 Fontanella F. 2004: II Verr. V, 152: Un possibile contributo alla datazione della Lex Plautia de reditu Lepidanorum // Athenaeum. 92. 2, 519–521.
 Gelzer M. 1926: Licinius (68) // RE. Hlbd 25, 295—331.
 Gelzer M. 1943: Das erste Konsulat des Pompeius und die Übertragung der großen Imperien. B.
 Gelzer M. 1969: The Roman Nobility. Oxf.
 Garzetti A.M. 1996: Scritti di storia repubblicana e augustea. Roma.
 Griffin M. 1973: The Tribune C. Cornelius // JRS. 63, 196–213.
 Gruen E. 1971: Some criminal trials of the Late Republic: political and prosopographical problems // Athenaeum. 49, 54–69.
 Gruen E. 1974: The Last Generation of the Roman Republic. Berkeley–Los Angeles–
 Hagen E. 1854: Untersuchungen über römische Geschichte. Teil 1. Catilina. Königsberg.
 Hayne L. 1974: The Politics of M'. Glabrio, Cos. 67 // CPh. 69. 4, 280–282.
 Hillard T.W. 1973: The Sisters of Clodius Again // Latomus. 32, 505–514.
 Hillard T.W. 1982: P. Clodius Pulcher 62–58 B.C.: «Pompeii Adfinis et Sodalis» // PBSR. 50, 34–44.
 Hinard F. 1985: Les proscriptions le la Rome républicaine. Rome.
 Johnson M.J. 2007: The Pontifical Law of the Roman Republic. Ph.D. Diss. New Brunswick–New Jersey.
 Katz B.R. 1983: Sertorius’ Overlooked Correspondent? // RhM. 126, 359–362.
 Keaveney A. 1984: Who were the Sullani? // Klio. 66, 114—150.
 Keaveney A. 1992: Lucullus. A Life. L.; N.Y.
 Keaveney A. 2005: Sulla. The Last Republican. L.–N.Y.
 Kelly D.H. 1970: Evidence for Legislation by Tribunes, 81–70 BC // Auckland Classical Essays presented to E. M. Blaiklock / B.F. Harris (ed.). Auckland, 133–142.
 Kelly G.P. 2006: A History of Exile in the Roman Republic. Cambridge.
 Koch C. 1958: Vesta // RE. 2 Reihe. Hlbd 16, 1747–1752.
 Lacour-Gayet G. 1889: P. Clodius Pulcher // Revue Historique. 41, 1–37.
 Lewis R.G. 2001: Catilina and the Vestal // CQ. 51, 141–149.
 Lovisi C. 1998: Vestale, incestus et juridiction pontificale sous la République romaine // MEFRA. 110. 2, 699–735.
 Marshall B. 1972: The «Lex Plotia Agraria» // Antichthon. 6, 43–52.
 Marshall B. 1973: Crassus and the Command against Spartacus // Athenaeum. 51, 109–121.
 Marshall B. 1976: Crassus: A Political Biography. Amsterdam.
 Marshall B. 1985a: A Historical Commentary on Asconius. Columbia.
 Marshall B. 1985b: Catilina and the Execution of M. Marius Gratidianus // CQ. N.S. 35, 124–133.
 Marshall B.A., Beness J.L. 1987: Tribunicial Agitation and Aristocratic Reaction 80–71 B.C. // Athenaeum. 65, 361–378.
 Maurenbrecher B.C. 1891: Sallusti Crispi Historiarum Reliquae. Fasc. I. Lipsiae.
 Mommsen Th. 1887: Römisches Staatsrecht. 3. Aufl. Bd II. 1 Abt. Lpz.
 Moreau Ph. 1982: Clodiana religio: un procès politique en 61 avant J.C. P.
 Münzer F. 1920: Römische Adelsparteien und Adelsfamilien. Stuttgart.
 Münzer F. 1939: Opimius (6, 11) // RE. Hlbd 35, 673–674, 677–680.
 Münzer F. 1951: Plautius (8) // RE. Hlbd 41, 7–9.
 Pina Polo F. 1996: Contra arma verbis. Der Redner vor dem Volk in der späten Römischen Republik. Stuttgart.
 Rathke J. 1904: De Romanorum Bellis Servilibus. B.
 Ravizza M. 2006: Catilina, Crasso e le vestali // Rivista di Diritto Romano. 6, 1–10.
 Rawson E. 1974: Religion and Politics in the Late Second Century B. C. at Rome // Phoenix. 28, 193–212.
 Rossi R.F. 1965: Sulla lotta politica in Romo dopo la morte di Silla // Parola del Passato. 21, 133–152.
 Rubinsohn Z. 1970: A Note on Plutarch, Crassus X, I // Historia. 19, 624–627.
 Santangelo F. 2014: Roman Politics in the 70s B.C.: a Story of Realignments? // JRS. FirstView Article (ehlektronnyj resurs). Dostup dlya zaregistrirovannykh pol'zovatelej. URL: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=9270873 (data obrascheniya: 24.08.2014 g.).
 Seager R. 1992: The Rise of Pompey // CAH. Vol. IX. The Last Age of the Roman Republic. 146—43 B.C. / J.A. Crook, A. Lintott, E. Rawson (ed.). Cambr. 208—228.
 Seager R. 2002: Pompey the Great. A Political Biography. Oxf.
 Shatzman I. 1968: Four notes on Roman magistrates // Athenaeum. 46, 345–354.
 Smith R.E. 1957: The Lex Plotia Agraria and Pompey’s Spanish veterans // CQ. 7. 1/2, 82–85.
 Staples A. 2004: From Good Goddess to Vestal Virgins. Sex and category in Roman religion. L.–Y.
 Stevens C.E. 1963: The ‘Plotting’ of B.C. 66/65 // Latomus. 22, 397–435.
 Sumner G.V. 1964: Manius or Mamercus? // JRS. 54, 41–48.
 Sumner G.V. 1974: The Orators in Cicero’s Brutus: Prosopography and Chronology. Toronto.
 Tatum J.W. 1991: Lucullus and Clodius at Nisibis (Plutarch, Lucullus 33–34) // Athenaeum. 79, 569–579.
 Tatum J.W. 1999: The Patrician Tribune: Publius Clodius Pulcher. Chapel Hill–London.
 Taylor L.R. 1942: Caesar’s Colleagues in Pontifical College // AJPh. 63, 385–412.
 Twyman B. 1972: The Metelli, Pompeius and Prosopography // ANRW. Bd 1. Teil 1 / J. Vogt, H. Temporini (Hrsg.). B.–N.Y., 839–862.
 Valverde L.A. 2001: La inscripción de Cupra Maritima, la colonia de Valentia y la lex Plotia agraria // Saguntum. 33, 65–74.
 Ward A. 1968: Cicero’s Support of Pompey in the Trials of M. Fonteius and P. Oppius // Latomus. 27. 4, 802—809.
 Ward A. 1977: Marcus Crassus and the Late Roman Republic. Columbia–
 Weinrib E.J. 1968: The Prosecution of Roman Magistrates // Phoenix. 22, 32–56.
 Wildfang R.L. 2006: Rome’s Vestal Virgins. A study of Rome’s Vestal priestesses in the late Republic and early Empire. L.–Y.
 Williams R.S. 1984: The Appointment of Glabrio (cos. 67) to the Eastern Command // Phoenix. 3, 221–234.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate