Везде
PUBLIUS SULPICIUS’ LEGISLATION AND ITS SOCIAL AND POLITICAL CONTEXT
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
PUBLIUS SULPICIUS’ LEGISLATION AND ITS SOCIAL AND POLITICAL CONTEXT
Annotation
PII
S0321-03910000375-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Anton Korolenkov 
ORCID: 0000-0002-3628-2754
Edition
Issue 3 (294)
Pages
30-45
Abstract

The author challenges the accepted view that the 88 BC plebeian tribune P. Sulpicius’ bills brought him to conflict with the Senate and were backed up by the equites whose interests he defended. In the author’s opinion, most senators were relatively well disposed to Sulpicius’ drafts, while the equites were not his main supporters: they supported him inasmuch as they were connected with the patres favourably disposed to the reformer. Following E. Badian, the author considers the data on the so-called Antisenatus to be unreliable and those on his law limiting senators’ debts to 2000 denarii to be out of context and ambiguous (these data being the most usual proofs of the mutual hostility of the Senate and Sulpicius). Nor could the bill on accepting the cives novi to all the 35 tribes have caused the senators’ strong disapproval, as it was just a continuation of the laws of 90–89 BC promoting rights of the Italians. The senators who opposed the tribune’s bills most of all were the consuls Sulla and Pompeius Rufus. Their opposition caused the interference of the army, thus launching the civil war.

Keywords
1st century BC civil war in Rome, senators, equites, Publius Sulpicius legislation, Sulla, Marius
Date of publication
01.07.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
745
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Egorov A.B. 1985: Rim na grani ehpokh: problemy rozhdeniya i formirovaniya printsipata. L.
 Ignatenko A.V. 1988: Drevnij Rim: ot voennoj demokratii k voennoj diktature (istoriko-pravovoe issledovanie). Sverdlovsk.
 Mashkin N.A. 1948: Istoriya Drevnego Rima. M.
 Mommzen T. 1994: Istoriya Rima. T. II. SPb.
 Nize B. 1908: Ocherk rimskoj istorii i istochnikovedeniya. SPb.
 Seletskij B.P. 1983: Finansovaya politika optimatov i populyarov v kontse 90–80-kh godov I v. do n.eh. // VDI. 1, 148–162.
 Sergeev V.S. 1938: Ocherki po istorii Drevnego Rima. Ch. I. M.
 Smirin V.M. 1955: Diktatura Sully (klassovaya suschnost' i istoricheskaya rol'). Dis. … kand. ist. nauk. M.
 Utchenko S.L. 1969: Drevnij Rim. Sobytiya. Lyudi. Idei. M.
 Tsirkin Yu.B. 2006: Grazhdanskie vojny v Rime. Pobezhdennye. SPb.
 Angeli Bertinelli M.G. 1997: [Introduzione, commento alla biografia di Silla] // Le Vite di Lisandro e di Silla. Milano, XXI–XXXVII, 289–418.
 Arbizu J.M. 2000: Res publica oppressa. Política popular en la crisis de la República (133–44 a.C.). Madrid.
 Arena V. 2012: Libertas and the Practice of Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambr.
 Badian E. 1958: Foreign Clientelae (264–70 B.C.). Oxf.
 Badian E. 1969: Quaestiones Variae // Historia. 18. 4, 447–491.
 Baker G.P. 1927: Sulla the Fortunate. Roman General and Dictator. L.
 Balsdon P.V.D. 1951: Sulla Felix // JRS. 41, 1–10.
 Bennett H. 1923: Sinna and His Times. A Critical and Interpretative Study of Roman History during the Period 87–84 BC. Diss. PhD. Menasha.
 Broughton T.R.S. The Magistrates of the Roman Republic. Vol. II. N.Y., 1952.
 Calabi I. 1950: Icommentarii di Silla come fonte storica // Atti della Academia Nazionale dei Lincei. Memorie Classe di Scienze morali, storiche e fililogiche. Serie VIII. Vol. III. Fasc. 5, 247–302.
 Carney T.F. 1961: A Biography of Marius. Assen.
 Chapman Ch.M. 1979: Cicero and P. Sulpicius Rufus (tr. pl. 88 B.C.) // Acta classica. 22, 61–72.
 Coşkun A. 2004: Zu den Rechtsgrundlagen der römischen Bürgerrechtsvergabe infolge des Bundesgenossenkrieges // Revue Internationale des Droits de l’Antiquité. 51, 101–132.
 De Sanctis G. 1976: La guerra sociale.
 Drumann W. 1902: Geschichte Roms in seinem Übergange von der republikanischen zur monarchischen Verfassung oder Pompeius, Caesar, Cicero und ihre Zeitgenossen. Aufl. / P. Groebe (Hrsg.). Bd 2. Lpz.
 Duruy V. 1880: Histoire des Romains. T. II. P.
 Evans R.J. 2007: The Sulpician Law on Debt: Implications for the Political Elite and Broader Ramifications // Acta classica. 50, 81–94.
 Frank T. 1933: On Some Financial Legislation of the Sullan Period // AJPh. 54. 1, 54–58.
 Fröhlich F. 1901: Cornelius (392) // RE. Bd IV, 1522–1566.
 Gabba E. 1976: Republican Rome, the Army and the Allies. Berkeley – Los Angeles.
 Gerlach F.D. 1856: Marius und Sulla oder Kampf der Demagogie und der Oligarchie. Eine geschichtliche Darstellung. Diss. Basel.
 Gowing A.M. 2005: Empire and Memory. The Representation of the Roman Republic in Imperial Culture. Cambr.
 Gruen E.S. 1968: Roman Politics and the Criminal Courts, 149–78 B.C. Cambr. (Mass.).
 Hawthorn J.R. 1962: The Senate after Sulla // G&R. 9. 1, 53–60.
 Heichelheim F.M., Yeo C.A. 1962: A History of the Roman People. Prentice-Hall.
 Hill H.M.A. 1952: The Roman Middle Class in the Republican Period. Oxf.
 Ihne W. 1879: Römische Geschichte. Bd V. Lpz.
 Katz B.R. 1977: Caesar Strabo’s Struggle for the Consulship and More // RhM. 120. 1, 45–63.
 Keaveney A. 1979: Sulla, Sulpicius and Caesar Strabo // Latomus. 38. 2, 451–460.
 Keaveney A. 1983: What Happened in 88? // 20, 53–86.
 Keaveney A. 2005: Sulla: the Last Republican. L.–N.Y.
 Lange L. 1871: Römische Altertümer. Bd III. B.
 Last H. 1932: The Leges Sulpiciae and the First Capture of Rome // CAH. Vol. IX. 201–206.
 Letzner W. 2000: Lucius Cornelius Sulla: Versuch einer Biographie. Münster.
 Lintott A.W. 1971: The Tribunate of P. Sulpicius Rufus // CQ. 21. 2, 442–453.
 Long J. 1866: The Decline of the Roman Republic. Vol. II. L.
 López C.R. 2005: La corruption à la fin de la république Romaine (IIe–Ier s. av. J.-S.): aspects politiques et financiers. Diss. PhD. Neuchâtel.
 Luce T.J. 1970: Marius and Mithridatic Command // Historia. 19. 2, 161–194.
 Mackay Ch.S. 2009: The Breakdown of the Roman Republic: From Oligarchy to Empire. Cambr.
 Meier Ch. 1966: Res publica amissa. Eine Studie zu Verfassung und Geschichte der späten römischen Republik. Wiesbaden.
 Meyer Ed. 1910: Kleine Schriften zur Geschichtstheorie und zur wirtschaftlichen und politischen Geschichte des Altertums. Halle.
 Millar F. 1986: Politics, Persuasion and the People before the Social War (150–90 B.C.) // JRS. 76, 1–11.
 Mitchell Th.N. 1975: The Volte-Face of P. Sulpicius Rufus in 88 B.C. // 70. 3, 197–204.
 Münzer F. 1931: Sulpicius (92) // RE. 2. R. Hlbd 7, 843–849.
 Neumann C. 1881: Geschichte Roms während des Verfalles der Republik. Bd I. Breslau.
 Nitzsch K. 1885: Geschichte der Römischen Republik. Bd II. Lpz.
 Nicolet C. 1966: L’ordre équestre à l’époque républicaine (312–43 av. J.-C.). T. I. P.
 Ooteghem van J. 1964: Caius Marius. Bruxelles.
 Pareti L. 1953: Storia di Roma e del mondo tomano. Vol. III. Torino.
 Passerini A. 1934: Caio Mario come uomo politico // Athenaeum. N.S. XII, 10–44, 109–143, 257–297, 348–380.
 Powell J.G.F. 1990: The Tribune Sulpicius // Historia. 39. 4, 446–460.
 Santangelo F. 2007: Sulla, the Elites and the Empire: A Study of Roman Policies in Italy and the Greek East. Leiden–Boston.
 Schur W. 1934: Sallust als Historiker. Stuttgart.
 Schur W. 1942: Das Zeitalter des Marius und Sulla. Lpz.
 Shatzman I. 1975: Senatorial Wealth and Roman Politics. Bruxelles.
 Syme R. 1939: The Roman Revolution. Oxf.
 Tansey R. 2003: The Death of M. Aemilius Scaurus («Cos». 115 B.C.) // Historia. 52. 3, 378–383.
 Timmer J.M. 2005: ‘Barbatuli iuvenes’ – Überlegungen zur Stellung der Jugend in der späten römischen Republik // Historische Anthropologie. 13. 2, 197–219.
 Valgiglio E. 1956: Silla e la crisi repubblicana. Firenze.
 Valgiglio E. 1967: Plutarco. Vita di Silla. Torino.
 Valgiglio E. 1975: L’autobiografia di Silla nelle biografie di Plutarco // Atti del Convegno: gli storiografi latini tramandati in frammenti. Urbino, 245–281.
 Willems P. 1883: Le sénat de la République romaine: sa composition et ses attributions. T. II. P.
 Williamson C. 2005: The Laws of the Roman People. Public Law in the Expansion and Decline of the Roman Republic. Ann Arbor.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate