Везде
NEWS OF VICTORY AND PERSIAN POST IN AESCHYLUS’ AGAMEMNON
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
NEWS OF VICTORY AND PERSIAN POST IN AESCHYLUS’ AGAMEMNON
Annotation
PII
S0321-03910000392-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Elena Chepel 
ORCID: 0000-0003-0924-3108
Edition
Issue 3 (278)
Pages
141-155
Abstract

The article concerns the barbaric word ἄγγαρος in Agamemnon 282 and its role in Aeschylean poetic and dramatic technique. Line 282 opens Klytaemnestra’s “beacon speech”, which is reckoned to be full of symbolic meaning and ambiguity, sending the spectator back to the fires of the sacked Troy. The commentators (Fraenkel, Judet de la Combe, Collard, Tracy) have noted that the word ἄγγαρος refers to the Achemenid institution of horsed courriers and trace back the Persian barbarian and therefore hybristic connotations of the tragic line. Tracy also mentions Herodotus’ report (IX 3) on the beacon post arranged by Mardonius after his sack of Athens in 479 BC. It is claimed that Aeschylus (and his spectator) kept in mind this event while writing (and performing) his tragedy. Still the purpose of such allusion, as well as the correlation between the beacon post and horse messengers in their historical and literary reality, remains unclear. An analysis of the Aeschylean imagery of the “beacon speech” sheds some light on the problem. The Aeschylean comparison of the light of the torch procession going from Troy to Argos with 155 a Persian horse messenger is based on three motifs found in the 5th and 4th century sources concerning Achaemenid pony express. In Herodotus and Xenophon it is characterized by its (1) miraculous, almost supernatural, divine speed and swiftness provided by (2) passing the message from one horse-rider to another and symbolizes (3) the power and splendour of the Achaemenid monarch and his empire. All three motifs are realized in Klytaemnestra’s speech either on a lexical or thematic level. Besides the poetics of this particular speech the barbarism ἄγγαρος is used for forming Klytaemnesta’s ethos, her masculine mind (androboulia), of which the clever invention of beacon post is a powerful and impressive symbol. The choice of a Persian word designating a Persian institution cannot be accidental in the context of lines 527–531 alluding to Persians 809–812 and general similarity between two Aeschylean plays observed by the critics. The sack of Troy is thereby assimilated with the sack of Athens, and Agamemnon himself – with a hybristic barbaric conqueror. These connotations are to be fully conveyed later in the text in the so-called “Carpet Scene”. Lastly, the problem of historical evidences of beacon post in Persia and Greece in the 5th century BC and its possible relation to the tragic text are investigated. As a conclusion, a suggestion is made that the word ἄγγαρος implies connotations of the forthcoming disaster and downfall awaiting arrangers both of the beacon post (Klytaemnestra, Agamemnon, Mardonius) and courrier post (Xerxes, Persians), even though they seem triumphant and victorious for the moment being. The semantics of the word ἄγγαρος draws up the ambiguity of the torch procession – a joyful piece of good news of victory, which soon turns out to be a disastrous defeat.

Keywords
Aeschylus, Herodotus, ancient Greek tragedy, Greek-Persian contacts, post system, signal fires
Date of publication
01.07.2011
Number of purchasers
1
Views
465
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Belloni L. 1988: Eschilo. I Persiani. Milano.
 Di Benedetto V. 1978: L’ideologia del potere e la tragedia greca: Ricerche su Eschilo.Torino.
 Boedeker D. 2001: Paths to Heroization at Plataea // The New Simonides. Contexts of Praise and Desire / D. Boedeker, D. Sider (eds). Oxf., 148–164.
 Bowie A. M. 2007: Herodotus: Histories. Book VIII. Cambr.–N.Y.
 Briant P. 2002: From Cyrus to Alexander. A History of the Persian Empire. Winona Lake.
 Briant P. 2005: L’archéologie de l’empire achémenide: nouvelles recherches. P.
 Chapot V. 1911: Signa militaria // DAGR 4, 2, 1307–1336.
 Chiasson C.C. 1979: The Question of Tragic Infl uence on Herodotus. Diss.Yale University.
 Demianczuk I. 1967: Supplementum comicum. Hildesheim.
 Denniston J.D., Page D. 1957: Aeschylus’Agamemnon. Oxf.
 Collard Chr. 2002: Aeschylus’ Oresteia. Oxf.
 Conacher D.J. 1987: Aeschylus’ Oresteia: A Literary Commentary. Toronto.
 Curtius E. 1850: Phönizier in Argos // RhM. 7, 455–460.
 Ferrari G. 2000: The Ilioupersis in Athens // HSCP 100, 119–150.
 Flower M.A., Marincola J. 2002: Herodotus: Histories Book IX. Cambr.
 Fohl H. 1913: Tragische Kunst bei Herodot. Borna–Leipzig.
 Fraenkel E. 1950: Aeschylus: Agamemnon. 3 vols. Oxf.
 Fries C. 1903: Babylonische Feuerpost // Klio 3, 169.
 Fries C. 1904: Zur babylonischen Feuerpost // Klio 4, 117–121.
 Gabrielli M. 2006: Le cheval dans l’empire achémenide. İstanbul.
 Gantz T.N. 1977: The Fires of the Oresteia // JHS 97, 28–38.
 Goldhill S. 1997: Modern Critical Approaches to Greek Tragedy // The Cambridge Companion to Greek Tragedy / Easterling P.E. (ed.). Cambr., 324–348.
 Hall E. 1988: When did the Trojans turn into Phrygians? Alcaeus 42.15 // ZPE 73, 15–18.
 Hall E. 1989: Inventing the Barbarian: Greek Self-Defi nition through Tragedy. Oxf.
 Hall E. 2006: The theatrical cast of Athens: interactions between Ancient Greek drama and society. Oxf.
 Hauvette A. 1894: Hérodote: Histoires des guerres médiques. P.
 Holtsmark E.B. 1959: Some Aspects of Style and Theme in the Persae of Aeschylus. Diss. University of California.
 Jouanna J. 1981: Causes de la défaite barbare chez Éschyle, Hérodote, Hippocrate // Ktema 6, 3–15.
 Judet de la Combe P. 2001: L’Agamemnon d’Eschyle: Commentaire des dialogues. V. I. P.
 Jüthner J. 1924: Lampadedromia // RE 12, 569–577.
 Lloyd-Jones H. 1970: Agamemnon by Aeschylus. Engelwood Cliffs. New Jarce
 Malten L. 1913: Hephaistia // RE 8, 314.
 Mancini M. 1994: Etimologia e semantica del gr. Ἄγγαρος // Glotta 7, 210–222.
 Munson R. 2005: Black Doves Speak. Herodotus and the Languages of Barbarians. Washington.
 Nielsen F.A.J. 1997: The Tragedy in History. Herodotus and Deuteronomic History. Sheffi ed.
 Petrounias E. 1967: Funktion und Thematik der Bilder bei Aischylos. Diss. Tübingen.
 Rawlinson G. 1880: History of Herodotos. L.
 Rostowzew M. 1906: Angariae // Klio 6, 249–258.
 Sancisi-Weerdenburg H. 1993: Exit Atossa: Images of Women in Greek Historiography on Persia // Images of Women in Antiquity / A. Cameron, A. Kuhrt (eds.). Routledge, 20–33.
 Sandbach F.H. 1972: Menandri reliquiae selectae. Oxf.
 Taplin O. 1972: The Stagecraft of Aeschylus: The Dramatic Use of Exits and Entrances in Greek Tragedy. Oxf.
 Thompson G. 1966: The Oresteia of Aeschylus. V. II. Amsterdam–Prague.
 Tracy S.V. 1986: Darkness from Light: The Beacon Fire in the Agamemnon // CQ, 36. 257–260.
 Wiles D. 1987: Reading Greek Performance // GR 34, 136–151.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate