Везде
THE TRANSPARENCY OF INFORMATION AS A BASIS OF INNOVATION DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY FOR THE RUSSIAN ECONOMY
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
THE TRANSPARENCY OF INFORMATION AS A BASIS OF INNOVATION DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY FOR THE RUSSIAN ECONOMY
Annotation
PII
S042473880000616-6-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Valerii Malyshev 
Edition
Volume 49 Issue 1
Pages
3-18
Abstract

The author proves that the transition to innovation economy is determined not only by increasing high-technology products but mainly by changing of mechanism of production affairs. It is shown that Russian economy today is highly monopolized with profit maximization behavior of producers whereas the Innovation Development Strategy up to 2020 supposes the basic renovation. The crux of this renovation is changing the reproduction process by including consumption into it. Also the role of prices should change: their stimulation function would be replaced by distributional function.

Keywords
monopoly, monopsony, maximization behavior, consumption production, distribution function of prices, transaction costs, competition, state interests, balanced economy, interbranch technological progress, interbranch companies’ cooperation
Date of publication
01.01.2013
Number of purchasers
1
Views
826
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Blaug M. (2004). Metodologiya ehkonomicheskoj nauki, ili Kak ehkonomisty ob'yasnyayut // Vopr. ehkonomiki. № 3.


Vvedenie v institutsional'nuyu ehkonomiku (2005) / Pod red. D.S. L'vova. M.: Ehkonomika.


Gajdar E. (2004). Bogatye i bednye. Stanovlenie i krizis sotsial'noj zaschity v sovremennom mire. Stat'ya pervaya // Nezavisimaya gazeta. 14 maya.


Doklad o mirovom razvitii (2010). Doklad o mirovom razvitii. Razvitie i izmenenie klimata. Vsemirnyj bank. M.: Ves' mir.


Zhit' po-chelovecheski (2008). Vladimir Putin vystupil na rasshirennom zasedanii Gossoveta // Rossijskaya gazeta. 9 fevralya. № 28 (Federal'nyj vypusk № 4585).


Kantorovich L.V. (1959). Ehkonomicheskij raschet nailuchshego ispol'zovaniya resursov. M.: Nauka.


Kuvshinova O. Nachat' s sebya // Vedomosti (2012). 30 marta. № 57 (3071).


Malyshev V.L. (2010). Ot ehkonomiki sopernichestva k ehkonomike sotrudnichestva. M.: Ehkonomika.


Marks K. (1974). Kapital. Tom 2. M.: Izd-vo politicheskoj literatury.


Marks K. (1975). Kapital. Tom 3. M.: Izd-vo politicheskoj literatury.


Marks K. (1980). Ehkonomicheskie rukopisi 1857–1861. (Pervonachal'nyj variant “Kapitala”). Chast' I. M.: Izd-vo politicheskoj literatury.


Mau V. (2005). Ehkonomicheskaya politika v 2004 godu: poisk modeli konsolidatsii rosta // Vopr. ehkonomiki. № 1.


Nel'son R., Uinter S. (2002). Ehvolyutsionnaya teoriya ehkonomicheskikh izmenenij. M.: Delo.


Ojken V. (1995). Osnovnye printsipy ehkonomicheskoj politiki. M.: Progress.


Prem'era Putina (2008). Zavershayuschaya press-konferentsiya prezidenta Putina otkryla ego novye perspektivy // Rossijskaya gazeta. Stolichnyj vypusk. 15 fevralya. № 33 (4590). (Po materialam agentstva podgotovili E. Vlasova, V. Kuz'min, A. Il'in).


Robinson Dzh. (1986). Ehkonomicheskaya teoriya nesovershennoj konkurentsii. M.: Progress.


Tambovtsev V.L. (2004). Vvedenie v ehkonomicheskuyu teoriyu kontraktov. M.: INFRA-M.


Uil'yamson O. (2001). Priroda firmy. M.: Delo.


Khodzhson D. (2003). Ehkonomicheskaya teoriya i instituty. M.: Delo.


Shumpeter J. (1982). Teoriya ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya. M.: Progress.


Yaremenko Yu.V. (1999). Prioritety strukturnoj politiki i opyt reform. M.: Nauka.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate