Везде
THE FIGURATIVE COMMUNICATIONS OF THE POPULATION OF THE CENTRAL ASIA IN THE BRONZE AGE
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
THE FIGURATIVE COMMUNICATIONS OF THE POPULATION OF THE CENTRAL ASIA IN THE BRONZE AGE
Annotation
PII
S0869-60630000392-4-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Viktor Novozhenov 
Edition
Issue 3
Pages
20-36
Abstract
The author refers the figurative, statuary and megalithic traditions of the ancient population of the Asian part of the steppe Eurasia and their development in the space and time to the figurative communications and also emphasizes figurative traditions - the Pit-Grave-Afanasievo, Andronovo and Karasuk and tries to reconstruct the fragments of its figurative codes.The following fragments of the Pit-Grave-Afanasievo graphic range are reconstructed:... => "solar" or "birdhead" personage (the first ancestor - a man, a charioteer or a woman) => a vehicle on disk wheels (a wagon, a cart or a two-wheeled cart) => a bull (fat or slim, in the South - a camel) => a bird (a crane) => cross shaped or phallic symbols =>... The Andronovo figurative tradition was developing on the basis of the bright and authentic Pit-Grave-Afanasievo one, the bearers of which in the second half of the 3rd millennium ВС settled on the whole Great steppe belt and forest steppe of Eurasia, so called "Northern wave". The southern impulse of this tradition's development, reserved a significant Sumerian component, has reached the territory of the Central Asia through the tribes of Bactria-Margiana Archaeological Complex. The fragments of the Andronovo graphic code are:... => "solarhead" personage in canonical poses (or a man with accentuated sexual characters and a "tail, sometimes with a "sphere" on the end") => a chariot (on the wheels with spokes harnessed with horses in a standard position, back to back, and the chariot is in only position "top view") => different types of weapon => a horse with a "forelock" detailed by mane (tail) => fat bulls with big horns curved forward => camels => solar symbols (cross shaped symbols) =>... The figurative code of the Karasuk tradition has a range of critical differences. There are no canonical "solarheads" personages, who are changed by the relative depiction of a man and possibly transformed into anthropomorphic megalithic construction - "deer stones" symbolizing charioteers. The fragments of the graphic code are:... => relative depiction of a man, often without gender differences and specifications => the objects of weaponry (on the deer stones) => a chariot with a special manner of the depiction of draft horses (or unharnessed) => a relative depiction of ahorse => a deer with branching horns => a fat bull => a wide range of symbols =>...Thus the Pit-Grave-Afanasievo figurative tradition stands out in the figurative monuments of the Early Bronze Age of the Central Asia. In the petroglyphs of the Middle and Late Bronze Age two chronological layers collocated to the first half- the third quarter of the 2 nd millennium ВС and the second half of the 2 nd - the first half of the 1 st millennium ВС, which can be related with the Andronovo and Karasuk traditions, are identified.
Keywords
Pit-Grave (Yamnaya)-Afanasievo fi gurative tradition, Andronovo fi gurative tradition, Karasuk fi gurative tradition, megalithic tradition, ornamental tradition, figurative range/code, style, petroglyphs, communications, migrations, wagons, chariots
Date of publication
01.07.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
576
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf Download JATS

References



Additional sources and materials

    

  1. Akishev K.A., Akishev A.K. Problema khronologii rannego ehtapa sakskoj kul'tury // Arkheologicheskie pamyatniki Kazakhstana / Red. KA. Akishev. Alma-Ata: IIAEh AN KazSSR, 1978. S. 38-63.
    2. 

  2. Akishev K.A., Akishev A.K. Drevnee zoloto Kazakhstana. Alma-Ata: Oner, 1983. 34 s.
    3. 

  3. Bochkarev B.C. K voprosu o khronologicheskom sootnoshenii Sejminskogo i Turbinskogo mogil'nikov // Problemy arkheologii Podneprov'ya. Dnepropetrovsk: DGU, 1986. Vyp. 3. S. 107-109.
    4. 

  4. Vinnik D.F., Kuz'mina E.E. Vtoroj Karakol'skij klad // KSIA. 1981. Vyp. 167. S. 48-53.
    5. 

  5. Volkov V.V. Olennye kamni Mongolii. M.: Nauchnyj mir, 2002. 248 s.
    6. 

  6. Grushin S.P. Nakonechniki kopij sejminsko-turbinskogo tipa Ob'-Irtyshskogo mezhdurech'ya // Kul'tury stepnoj Evrazii i ikh vzaimodejstvie s drevnimi tsivilizatsiyami. Mater. mezhdunar. nauchn. konf., posvyaschennoj 110-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya vydayuschegosya ross, arkheologa M.P. Gryaznova. T. 2 / Red. VA. Alekshin, E.V. Bobrovskaya i dr. SPb.: IIMK RAN, 2012. S. 224-228.
    7. 

  7. Epimakhov A.V. "Gorizont kolesnichnykh kul'tur" bronzovogo veka: otsenka ehvristicheskikh vozmozhnostej // Izvestiya Chelyabinskogo nauchnogo tsentra. Vyp. 1 (39) / Red. A. Tairov. 2008. S. 93-96.
    8. 

  8. Epimakhov A.V., Khehnke B., Renfryu K. RAdiouglerodnaya khronologiya pamyatnikov bronzovogo veka ZauRAl'ya // RA. 2005. № 4. S. 92-102 (na angl. yazyke sm: Antiquity. 2007. V. 81. R. 353-367).
    9. 

  9. Esin Yu.N. Problemy vydeleniya izobrazhenij afanas'evskoj kul'tury v naskal'nom iskusstve Minusinskoj kotloviny // Afanas'evskij sbornik / Red. N.F. Stepanova, A.V. Polyakov. Barnaul: Azbuka, 2010. S. 53-73.
    10. 

  10. Zdanovich G.B. Bronzovyj vek uralo-kazakhstanskikh stepej. Sverdlovsk: Izd-vo Ural'skogo GU, 1988. 184 s.
    11. 

  11. Kadyrbaev M.K, Kurmankulov Zh.K Kul'tura drevnikh skotovodov i metallurgov Sary Arki (po materialam Severnoj Betpak-Daly). Almaty: Gylym, 1992.247 s.
    12. 

  12. Kovalev A.A. Drevnejshie evropejtsy v serdtse Azii: chemurchekskij fenomen kak klyuch k resheniyu problemy tokharskoj prarodiny // Kul'tury stepnoj Evrazii i ikh vzaimodejstvie s drevnimi tsivilizatsiyami. Mater, mezhdunar. nauchn. konf., poev. 110-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya vydayuschegosya rossijskogo arkheologa M.P. Gryaznova. T. 2 / Red. V.A. Alekshin, E.V. Bobrovskaya i dr. SPb: IIMK RAN, 2012. S. 49-56.
    13. 

  13. Kovaleva O.V. Naskal'nye risunki ehpokhi pozdnej bronzy Minusinskoj kotloviny. Novosibirsk: IAEhT SO RAN, 2011. 160 s.
    14. 

  14. Kovtun I.V. Izobrazitel'nye traditsii ehpokhi bronzy Tsentral'noj i Severo-Zapadnoj Azii. Problemy genezisa i khronologii ikonograficheskikh kompleksov severo-zapadnogo Sayano-Altaya. Novosibirsk: IAEhT SO RAN, 2001. 184 s.
    15. 

  15. Kubarev V.D. Drevnie rospisi Karakola. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1988. 173 s.
    16. 

  16. Kuz'minykh.V. Sejminsko-turbinskaya problema: novye materialy // KSIA. 2011. Vyp. 225. S. 240-263.                  
    17. 

  17. Kukushkin I.A. Metallicheskie izdeliya RAnneandronovskogo mogil'nika Aschisu// RA. 2011. №2. S. 110-116.
    18. 

  18. Kurmankulov Zh.K, Ermolaeva A.S. Arkheologiya ehpokhi bronzy v nezavisimom Kazakhstane // Svideteli tysyacheletij: arkheologicheskaya nauka Kazakhstana za 20 let / Red. B.A. Bajtanaev. Almaty: IA MON RK, 2011. S. 69-84.
    19. 

  19. Lazaretov I.P. Okunevskie mogil'niki v doline r. Ujbat // Okunevskij sbornik. Kul'tura. Iskusstvo. Antropologiya. SPb.: IIMK RAN, 1997. S. 137-146.
    20. 

  20. Leont'ev N.V. Kolesnyj transport ehpokhi bronzy na Enisee // Voprosy arkheologii Khakasii. Abakan: Kn. izd-vo, 1980. S. 65-84.
    21. 

  21. Logvin A.V., Shevnina I.V. Ob odnom sintashtinskom pogrebal'nom komplekse mogil'nika Bestamak // Arkheologiya Kazakhstana v ehpokhu nezavisimosti: itogi i perspektivy. Mater. mezhdunar. nauchnoj konf., posvyasch. 20-letiyu Nezavisimosti Respubliki Kazakhstan i 20-letiyu Instituta arkheologii im. A.Kh. Margulana. T. 1 / Red. B.A. Bajtanaev, A.Z. Bejsenov. Almaty: IA MONRK, 2011. S. 349-360.
    22. 

  22. Mar'yashev A.N. Naskal'nye izobrazheniya Kazakhstana: itogi 20-letnego izucheniya i problemy // Arkheologiya Kazakhstana v ehpokhu nezavisimosti: itogi i perspektivy. Mater. mezhdunar. nauchnoj konf., posvyasch. 20-letiyu Nezavisimosti Respubliki Kazakhstan i 20-letiyu Instituta arkheologii im. A.Kh. Margulana. T. 1 / Red. B.A. Bajtanaev, A.Z. Bejsenov. Almaty: IA MONRK, 2011. S. 36-40.
    23. 

  23. Mar'yashev A.N., Goryachev A.A. Itogi izucheniya pamyatnikov ehpokhi bronzy Zhetysu // Svideteli tysyacheletij: arkheologicheskaya nauka Kazakhstana za 20 let / Red. B.A. Bajtanaev. Almaty: IA MON RK, 2011. S. 313- 337.
    24. 

  24. Merts V.K Naskal'nye risunki kraya Kereku-Bayan. Pavlodar: Pavlodarskij GU, 2002. 114 s.
    25. 

  25. Merts V.K. Kamennyj zhezl s antropomorfnym izobrazheniem iz Pavlodarskoj oblasti // VIII istoricheskie chteniya pamyati M.P. Gryaznova (k 110-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya). Sb. nauchn. trudov / Red. NA. Tomilov i dr. Omsk: OGU, 2012. S. 130-135.
    26. 

  26. Merts I.V. Istoriya izucheniya ehpokhi rannej bronzy Vostochnogo i Severo-Vostochnogo Kazakhstana// Khozyajstvenno-kul'turnye traditsii Altaya v ehpokhu bronzy / Red. N.F. Stepanova i dr. Barnaul: Azbuka, 2010. S. 49-58.
    27. 

  27. Novgorodova Eh.A. Drevnyaya Mongoliya. M.: Nauka, 1989.384 s.
    28. 

  28. Novozhenov V.A. Petroglify Sary Arki. Almaty: IA HAH PK, 2002. 125 s.
    29. 

  29. Novozhenov V.A. Chudo kommunikatsii i drevnejshij kolesnyj transport Evrazii/ Red. E.E. Kuz'mina. M.: Taus, 2012a. 500 s.
    30. 

  30. Novozhenov V.A. Andronovskaya izobrazitel'naya traditsiya: konets mifa? (metodologicheskij aspekt) // Arkheologiya i istoriya Sary Arki / Red. P.M. Zhumashev. Karaganda: KarGU, 20126. S. 114-145.
    31. 

  31. Novozhenov V.A. Velikaya step': chelovek v sisteme drevnikh kommunikatsij // Tainstvo ehtnicheskoj istorii drevnejshikh nomadov stepej Evrazii / Red. A.V. Epimakhov; sost. V.A. Novozhenov. Almaty: Nauch.-restavr. laboratoriya "Ostrov Krym", KazNII kul'tury, 2014a. S. 17-273.
    32. 

  32. Novozhenov V.A. K voprosu o proiskhozhdenii A-obraznogo tipa dvukolok Minusinskoj kotloviny // AEhAE. 20146. №2(58). S. 90-100.
    33. 

  33. Podol'skij M.L. Fenomen i paradoksy Minusinskoj stepi (smena kul'turnykh dominant) // Kul'turno-ehkologicheskie oblasti: vzaimodejstvie traditsij i kul'turogenez: sb. nauchn. statej. SPb.: IIMK RAN, 2007. S. 113-128.
    34. 

  34. Pyatkin B.N., Miklashevich E.A. Sejminsko-turbinskaya izobrazitel'naya traditsiya: plastika i petroglify // Problemy izucheniya naskal'nykh izobrazhenij v SSSR/ Red. M.A. Dehvlet. M.: Nauka, 1990. S. 146- 153.
    35. 

  35. Rezepkin A.D. K interpretatsii rospisi iz grobnitsy majkopskoj kul'tury bliz st. Novosvobodnaya // KSIA. 1987. Vyp. 192. S. 26-32.
    36. 

  36. Rogozhinskij A.E. Izobrazitel'nyj ryad petroglifov ehpokhi bronzy svyatilischa Tamgaly // Istoriya i arkheologiya Semirech'ya. Vyp. 2 / Red. A.N. Mar'yashev, Yu.A. Motov. Almaty: IA HAH PK, 2001. S. 7-44.
    37. 

  37. Rogozhinskij A.E. Naskal'nye izobrazheniya "solntsegolovykh" iz Tamgaly v kontekste izobrazitel'nykh traditsij bronzovogo veka Kazakhstana i Srednej Azii // Materialy i issledovaniya po arkheologii Kyrgyzstana. Vyp. 4. Bishkek: IIKN HAH KP, 2009. S. 53-65.
    38. 

  38. Rogozhinskij A.E. Obrazy i realii drevnezemledel'cheskoj tsivilizatsii Srednej Azii v naskal'nom iskusstve ehpokhi bronzy Yuzhnogo Kazakhstana i Semirech'ya // Naskal'noe iskusstvo v sovremennom obschestve. Mater. mezhdunar. nauchnoj konf. / Red. O.S. Sovetova i dr. Kemerovo: SAIPI, 2011a. S. 87-99.
    39. 

  39. Rogozhinskij A.E. Petroglify arkheologicheskogo landshafta Tamgaly. Almaty: Signet Print, 20116. 342 s.
    40. 

  40. Savinov D.G. Rannie kochevniki Verkhnego Eniseya: Arkheologicheskie kul'tury i kul'turogenez. SPb.: SP6GU, 2002. 257 s.
    41. 

  41. Samashev 3. Naskal'nye izobrazheniya Verkhnego Priirtysh'ya. Alma-Ata: Gylym, 1992. 288 s.
    42. 

  42. Samashev 3. Petroglify Kazakhstana. Almaty: Oner, 2006. 200 s.
    43. 

  43. Samashev 3. Naskal'nye izobrazheniya Zhetysu Bayanzhu-rek. Astana: Filial IA MON RK, 2012a. 240 s.
    44. 

  44. Samashev 3. Izobrazitel'naya deyatel'nost' v bronzovom veke (k izucheniyu problemy v kontekste kul'turogeneza) // Mater. respublikan. nauchno-praktich. konf. "IV Orazbaevskie chteniya" na temu "Problemy i dostizheniya otechestvennoj arkheologii i ehtnologii v XXI stoletii", priurochennoj k 90-letiyu A.M. Orazbaeva / Red. A.B. Kalysh i dr. Almaty: "Kazak universitetG (KazNU), 20126. S. 20-31.
    45. 

  45. Samashev 3., Bajtleu D., Kariev E., Murgabaev S. Issledovanie arkheologicheskogo kompleksa Baganaly v Shielinskom rajone Kyzylordinskoj oblasti // Arkheologicheskie issledovaniya stepnoj Evrazii. Sb. statej k 70-letiyu V.V. Evdokimova / Red. V.G. Loman. Karaganda: KarGU, 2013. S. 71-88.
    46. 

  46. Sarianidi V.I. Zadolgo do Zaratushtry. Arkheologicheskie dokazatel'stva protozoroostrizma v Baktrii i Margiane. M.: Staryj sad, 2010. 210 s.
    47. 

  47. Sarianidi V.I., Dubova N.A. Novye grobnitsy na territorii tsarskogo nekropolya Gonura (predvaritel'noe soobschenie) // Na puti otkrytiya tsivilizatsii. Trudy Margianskoj arkheologicheskoj ehkspeditsii / Red. N.A. Dubova. SPb.: Nauka, 2010. S. 210-256.
    48. 

  48. Smirnov N.Yu. Na chem ezdil arzhanskij "tsar'"? // Kul'tury stepnoj Evrazii i ikh vzaimodejstvie s drevnimi tsivilizatsiyami. Mater. mezhdunar. nauchn. konf., posvyaschennoj 110-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya vydayuschegosya ross, arkheologa M.P. Gryaznova. T. 2 / Red. V.A. Alekshin, E.V.Bobrovskaya i dr. SPb.: IIMK RAN, 2012. S. 424-431.
    49. 

  49. Tkachev A. A. Tsentral'nyj Kazakhstan v ehpokhu bronzy. Tyumen': TGNGU, 2002.
    50. 

  50. Filippova E.E. Pogrebal'nye petroglify Srednego Eniseya i ikh mesto v ideologicheskikh predstavleniyakh karasukskikh plemen // Arkheologicheskij sbornik. Pogrebal'nyj obryad. Tr. GIM. Vyp. 93. M.: GIM, 1997. S. 62-69.
    51. 

  51. Chenchenkova O.P. Kamennaya skul'ptura lesostepnoj Azii ehpokhi paleometalla III-I tys. do n.eh. / Red. D.G. Savinov. Ekaterinburg: Tezis, 2004. 336 s.
    52. 

  52. Chernikov S. S. Vostochnyj Kazakhstan v ehpokhu bronzy. M.: Nauka, 1960. 272 s. (MIA № 88).
    53. 

  53. Chernykh E.N., Kuz'minykh S.V. Drevnyaya metallurgiya Severnoj Evrazii. M.: Nauka, 1989. 320 s.
    54. 

  54. Chechushkov I.V. Kolesnichnyj kompleks ehpokhi pozdnej bronzy stepnoj i lesostepnoj Evrazii (ot Dnepra do Irtysha) //Avtoref. dis.. kand. ist. nauk: 07.00.06. M.:IA RAN, 2013.27 s.
    55. 

  55. Chugunov K.V. Plity s petroglifami v komplekse kurgana Arzhan 2 (k khronologii arzhano-maehmirskogo stilya) // Tropoyu tysyacheletij. Sb. nauchn. tr., posv. yubileyu M.A. Dehvlet/ Red. O.S. Sovetova, E.A. Miklashevich i dr. Kemerovo: KemGU, 2008. S. 53-69.
    56. 

  56. Sher Ya.A. Petroglify Srednej i Tsentral'noj Azii.M.: Nauka, 1980a. 328 s.
    57. 

  57. Sher Ya.A. Rannij ehtap skifo-sibirskogo zverinogo stilya //Skifo-sibirskoe kul'turno-istoricheskoe edinstvo / Red. A.I. Martynov, O.S. Sovetova, E.A. Miklashevich i dr. Kemerovo: KemGU, 1980b. S. 344-346.
    58. 

  58. Sher Ya.A. Stil' v pervobytnom iskusstve // Izobrazitel'nye pamyatniki: stil', ehpokha, kompozitsii. Mater.tematicheskoj nauchn. konf. SPb.: IIMK RAN, 2004.S. 9-13.
    59. 

  59. Shkoda V.G. Dve kamennye skul'ptury paleometalla //Sbornik GEh. SPb.: GEh, 1997. S. 48-51.
    60. 

  60. Ehneolit SSSR / Red. V.M. Masson, N.Ya. Merpert. M.:Nauka, 1982. 360 s. (Arkheologiya SSSR).          
    61. 

  61. Qi Xiaoshan, Wang Bo. The Ancient Culture in Xinjiang Along the Silk Road. Xinjiang: XUARICEA, 2008. 304 p.
    62. 

  62. Shvets I.N. Studien zur Felsbildkunst Kasachstans. Materialien zur Archaeologie Kasachstans. Bd.1. Darmstadt/Mainz: Philipp von Zabern, 2012. 417 s.
    63.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate