Везде
Technological analysis of medieval crucibles from Pereyaslavl Ryazanskiy
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Technological analysis of medieval crucibles from Pereyaslavl Ryazanskiy
Annotation
PII
S086956870001632-6-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Vladimir I. Zavyalov 
Affiliation: Institute of Archaeology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation
Olga Lopatina
Affiliation: Institute of Archaeology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation
Vasiliy Sudakov
Affiliation: Ryazan Historical and Architectural Museum-Reserve
Address: Russian Federation
Edition
Issue 3
Pages
43-51
Abstract

The article considers a series of crucibles (3 unbroken ones and 15 fragments) found during excavations of the medieval city of Pereyaslavl Ryazanskiy. The objects date back to the 13th–14th centuries. In terms of their morphology, the crucibles are represented by different types: open thin-walled cones with a separate drain and rounded bottom, cylindrical with a rounded bottom, open thick-walled in the shape of a small saucer, half-closed spoon-shaped with a rounded bottom and a two-sided vertical handle. The authors deal with the issue of recovering initial technological information on the features of clay used and on the composition of the molding masses in the crucibles. In addition, there is a link traced between this technological information and the morphology of the crucibles. A certain variety of both argillaceous raw materials and recipes of molding composition was found. Clays of different ferruginous degrees with different composition of natural mineral admixtures were used. Such ingredients as crushed charcoal, vegetable organics, and carbonates were specially introduced into the molding composition as artificial admixtures. The connection between open thin-walled crucibles and the molding composition of nonferruginous us clay and crushed charcoal was most clearly traced.

Keywords
Pereyaslavl Ryazanskiy, crucible, argillaceous raw materials, molding composition
Received
14.10.2018
Date of publication
15.10.2018
Number of purchasers
10
Views
1872
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf Download JATS

References

1. Avgustinik A. I., 1975. Keramika [Ceramics]. 2nd ed. Leningrad: Stroyizdat. 591 p.

2. Bayley J., 1992. Metalworking ceramics. Medieval Ceramics, 16, pp. 3–10.

3. Bayley J., Rehren T., 2007. Towards a functional and typological classification of crucibles. Metals and Mines Studies in Archaeometallurgy. London: Archetype: British Museum, pp. 46–55.

4. Bobrinskiy A. A., 1978. Goncharstvo Vostochnoy Evropy. Istochniki i metody izucheniya [Pottery of Eastern Europe. Sources and Methods of Study]. Moscow: Nauka. 272 p.

5. Bobrinskiy A. A., 1999. Pottery technology as an object of historical and cultural study. Aktual’nye problemy izucheniya drevnego goncharstva [Urgent Issues of Studying Ancient Pottery]. Samara: Izd. Samar. gos. ped. univ., pp. 5–109. (In Russ.)

6. Burlakov G. S., 1972. Osnovy tekhnologii keramiki i iskusstvennykh poristykh zapolniteley [Fundamentals of Ceramics Technology and Artificial Porous Fillers]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola. 420 p.

7. Chaus K. V., Chistov Yu.D., Labzina Yu.V., 1988. Tekhnologiya proizvodstva stroitel’nykh materialov, izdeliy i konstruktsiy: uchebnik dlya vuzov [Technology of Production of Construction Materials, Products and Structures: a textbook for universities]. Moscow: Stroyizdat. 448 p.

8. Craddock P. T., 1995. Early Metal Mining and Production. Washington: Smithsonian Inst. Press. 363 p.

9. Doncheva S. M., 2013. Types and functions of casting vessels in the medieval Bulgaria. Stratum plus, 6, pp. 243–254. (In Russ.)

10. Eniosova N. V., Mitoyan R. A., 1999. Gnezdovo settlement crucibles. Arkheologicheskiy sbornik. Pamyati M. V. Fekhner [Collected papers in Archaeology. In memory of M. V. Fekhner]. Moscow: GIM, pp. 54–63. (Trudy GIM, 111). (In Russ.)

11. Eniosova N. V., Reren T., 2011. Melting vessels of Novgorod jewelers. Novgorodskie arkheologicheskie chteniya – 3 [Novgorod Archaeological Readings – 3]. Velikiy Novgorod: Novg. gos. muzey-zapovednik, pp. 243–254. (In Russ.)

12. Eniosova N. V., Zharnov Yu.E., 2006. Jewelry production association form “Vetchany Gorod” of pre-Mongol Vladimir. Ross. Arkheologiya [Russ. Archaeology], 2, pp. 64–80. (In Russ.)

13. Fatyunina O. A., 2017. A hermetic crucible from Pereyaslavl Ryazanskiy. KSIA [Brief Communications of the Institute of Archaeology], 247, pp. 372–383. (In Russ.)

14. Lopatina O. A., Kazdym A. A., 2010. O yestestvennoy primesi peska v drevney keramike (k obsuzhdeniyu problemy). [On the natural admixture of sand in ancient ceramics (to the issue discussion)]. Drevnee goncharstvo: itogi i perspektivy izucheniya [Ancient Pottery: Results and Prospects of Studying]. Moscow: IA RAN, pp. 46–57. (In Russ.)

15. Sudakov V. V. Otchet ob okhrannykh raskopkakh v g. Ryazani v 1986 g. [Report on Salvage Excavations in Ryazan in 1986]. Arkhiv IA RAN [The Archive of the Institute of Archaeology Russian Academy of Sciences], R‑1, 1987, № 12119. (Unpublished).

16. Sudakov V. V. Otchet ob okhrannykh raskopkakh v Kremle g. Ryazani v 1988 g. [Report on Salvage Excavations in the Kremlin of Ryazan in 1988]. Arkhiv IA RAN [The Archive of the Institute of Archaeology Russian Academy of Sciences], R‑1, 1989, № 14169. (Unpublished).

17. Tsetlin Yu.B., 2006. Ob opredelenii stepeni ozheleznennosti iskhodnogo syr’ya dlya proizvodstva glinyanoy posudy [Determination of the ferrugination degree of the raw material for pottery production]. Voprosy arkheologii Povolzh’ya [The Issues of the Volga Region Archaeology], 4. Samara: NTTs, pp. 421–425. (In Russ.)

18. Tylecote R. F., 1982. Metallurgical Crucibles and Crucible Slags. Archaeological Ceramics. J. S. Olin, A. D. Franklin, eds. Washington: Smithsonian Inst. Press, pp. 231–242.

19. Yushkevich M. O., Rogovoy M. I., 1969. Tekhnologiya keramiki [Ceramics Technology]. 3rd ed. Moscow: Izd. lit. po stroitel’stvu. 350 p.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate