Везде

RAS History & PhilologyРоссийская археология Russian archeology

  • ISSN (Print) 0869-6063
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5774

THE PROBLEM OF DISTRIBUTION OF SIONI TYPE POTTERY IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS IN THE CONTEXT OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATIONS IN THE TUMBULTEPE SETTLEMENT

You can
PII
S0869606325010027-1
DOI
10.31857/S0869606325010027
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Veli B. Bakhshaliyev
  • Affiliation: Nakhchivan State University
N. Ceylan
  • Affiliation: Kyrgyz-Turkish Manas University
E. Bakhshaliyev
  • Affiliation: Nakhchivan Branch of the National Academy of Sciences of Azerbaijan
H. Hasanova
  • Affiliation: Nakhchivan Branch of the National Academy of Sciences of Azerbaijan
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue number 1
Pages
21-36
Abstract
Many Caucasian scholars give a general name to the Late Chalcolithic culture of the South Caucasus: it is sometimes referred to as the Sioni culture, sometimes as the Sioni-Tsopi culture, sometimes as the Sioni ceramics, and sometimes as the Sioni-Tsopi-Ginchi culture. However, Sioni type pottery is very rare in the settlements of Nakhchivan. The study of material and cultural samples, especially the pottery from the newly excavated settlement of Tumbultepe and other sites of Nakhchivan, is vitally important for clarifying issues related to the Late Chalcolithic cultures of the South Caucasus, including the Sioni culture. Even if it is possible to refer to a group of Late Chalcolithic sites in the South Caucasus as to the Sioni-Tsopi-Ginchi culture, the authors believe it is not correct to attribute this to all the sites of the South Caucasus.
Keywords
Южный Кавказ культура Сиони Нахчыван Тумбултепе поздний энеолит
Date of publication
04.11.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
52

References

  1. 1. Абибуллаев О.А. Энеолит и бронза на территории Нахичеванской АССР. Баку: Наука, 1982. 316 с.
  2. 2. Алиев Н., Нариманов И. Культура северного Азербайджана в эпоху позднего энеолита. Баку: Aгрыдаг, 2001. 144 с.
  3. 3. Археология Венгрии (Каменный век) / Отв. ред. В.С. Титов, И. Эрдели, М. Габори. М.: Наука, 1980. 420 с.
  4. 4. Ахундов Т.И. У истоков Кавказской цивилизации. Неолит Азербайджана. Памятники традиции Гарабагского неолита. Баку: Афполиграф, 2017. 918 с.
  5. 5. Бахшалиев В.Б. Протокуро-аракская керамика Нахчывана // Российская археология. 2013. № 3. С. 105-107.
  6. 6. Бахшалиев В.Б. Новые энеолитические памятники на территории Нахчывана // Российская археология. 2014. № 2. С. 88-95.
  7. 7. Бахшалиев В.Б. Археологические исследования поселения Нахчывантепе // Российская археология. № 2. 2019. С. 96-109.
  8. 8. Бахшалиев В.Б. Археологические раскопки на поселении Кюльтепе I // Российская археология. 2022. № 1. С. 139-152.
  9. 9. Джапаридзе О. На заре этнокультурной истории Кавказа. Тбилиси: Изд-во Тбилисского ун-та, 1989. 423 с.
  10. 10. Мунчаев Р.М. Кавказ на заре бронзового века. М.: Наука, 1975. 478 с.
  11. 11. Мунчаев Р.М., Амиров Ш.Н. Лейлатепинская культура и Кавказ // Кавказ как связующее звено между Восточной Европой и Передним Востоком: диалог культур, культура диалога (к 140-летию Александра А. Миллера). СПб., 2015. С. 128-131.
  12. 12. Менадбе М., Кигурадзе Т. Археологические памятники села Сиони. Тбилиси: Мецниереба, 1981. 142 с.
  13. 13. Нариманов И.Г., Ахундов Т.И., Алиев Н.Г. Культура Лейлатепе. Баку: Агрыдаг, 2007. 128 с.
  14. 14. Черленок Е.А. Археология Кавказа (мезолит, неолит, энеолит): учеб.-метод. пособие. СПб., 2013. 54 с.
  15. 15. Acar G.Z. Naxcıvan və Şərqi Anadolunun Son Eneolit mədəniyyəti. Naxcıvan: Tusi, 2021. 32 s.
  16. 16. Abedi A., Khatib Shahidi H., Chataigner Ch. et al. Excavation at Kul Tepe of (Jolfa), North-Western Iran, 2010: First Preliminary Report // Ancient Near Eastern Studies. 2014. 51. P. 33-165.
  17. 17. Badalyan R., Harutyunyan A., Chataıgner Ch. et al. The Settlement of Aknashen-Khatunarkh, A Neolitic Site in the Ararat Plain (Armenia): Excavation Results 2004-2009 // TUBA-AR: Turkiye Bilimler Akademisi arkeoloji dergisi. 2010. 13. P. 185-218.
  18. 18. Bakhshaliyev V. Archaeology of Nakhchivan in the light new discoveries. Nakhchivan: Ajami, 2022. 372 p.
  19. 19. Baxşəliyev V., Marro C., Aşurov S. Ovculartəpəsi. Bakı: Elm, 2010. 156 s.
  20. 20. Camps G., Rostan E. Les poteries a perforations en ligne, a propos du facies terrinien du Chalcolithique corse // Bulletin de la Societe prehistorique francaise. 1982. Т. 79, 8. P. 240-249.
  21. 21. Derin Z., Caymaz T. The Chalcolithic period at Yeşilova Hoyuk // Communities in transition: the Circum Aegean area during the 5th and 4th millennia BC / Ed. by S. Dietz et al. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2017. P. 499-505.
  22. 22. Emre E. MO 5. ve 4. Binyıl Nahcıvan Mangaly Kapları: Yuksek Lisans Tezi. İzmir, 2017. 310 s.
  23. 23. Esin U. The relief decorations on the Prehistoric pottery of Tulintepe in Eastern Anatolia // Between the Rivers and over the Mountains / Ed.M. Frangipane et al. Roma: Universita di Roma “La Sapienza”, 1993. P. 105-122.
  24. 24. Gulcur S., Marro C. The view from the north: comparative analysis of the Chalcolithic pottery assemblages from Norşuntepe and Ovcular Tepesi // After the Ubaıd: Interpreting Change from the Caucasus to Mesopotamia at the Dawn of Urban Civilization (4500-3500 BC). Paris: De Boccard, 2012. P. 305-352.
  25. 25. Kiguradze T. The Chalcolithic-Early Bronze transition in the Eastern Caucasus // Chronologies des Pays du Caucase et de l’Euphrate aux IVe-IIIe millenaires / Ed. by C. Marro et H. Hauptmann. Istanbul: Institut Francais d’Etudes Anatoliennes, 2000. P. 321-328.
  26. 26. Kiguradze T., Sagona A. On the origins of the Kura-Araxes cultural complex // Archaeology in the Borderlands: Investigations in Caucasia and Beyond / Ed. by A.T. Smith, K. Rubinson. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, University of California, 2003. P. 38-94.
  27. 27. Kuliyeva Z., Bahşeliyev V. Nahcıvan’ın Kalkolitik Cağ Kulturu (Azerbaycan) // TUBA-AR: Turkiye Bilimler Akademisi arkeoloji dergisi. 2018. 23. S. 29-52.
  28. 28. Lyonnet B., Guliyev F., Helwing B. et al. Ancient Kura 2010-2011: The first two seasons of joint field work in the Southern Caucasus // Archaologische Mitteilungen aus Iran und Turan. 2012. 44. P. 1-190.
  29. 29. Maziar S. Excavations at Kohne Pasgah Tepesi, the Araxes Valley, the Northwest Iran: First Preliminary Report // Ancient Near Eastern Studies. 2010. 47. P. 165-193.
  30. 30. Ozfırat A., Marro С. 2004 Yılı Van, Ağrı ve İqdır İlleri Yuzey Araştırması // Turk Arkeoloji ve Etnografya Dergisi. 2007. № 7. S. 1-20.
  31. 31. Museyibli N. Boyuk Kəsik eneolit yaşayış məskəni. Bakı: Nafta-Press, 2007. 228 s.
  32. 32. Museyibli N. Leylatəpə mədəniyyəti. Bakı: Elm və Təhsil, 2020. 576 s.
  33. 33. Palumbi G. A Preliminary Analysis on the Prehistoric Pottery from Aratashen (Armenia) // Les Cultures du Caucase (VIe-IIIe millenaires avant notre ere). Leurs Relations avec le Proche-Orient / Dir. B. Lyonnet. Paris: Centre national de la recherche scientifique, 2007. P. 63-76.
  34. 34. Sharifi M., Motarjem A. The process of cultural change in the Chalcolithic period in the highlands of Western Iran at Tepe Gheshlagh // Documenta Prehistorica. 2018. XLV. P. 86-99.
  35. 35. Sampson A. The Neolithic of the Dodecanese and Aegean Neolithic // The Annual of the British School at Athens. 1984. Vol. 79. P. 239-247.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library