O neobxodimosti zakonodatel`nogo zakrepleniya v Rossii statusa kandidata na dolzhnost` sud`i
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
O neobxodimosti zakonodatel`nogo zakrepleniya v Rossii statusa kandidata na dolzhnost` sud`i
Annotation
PII
S1026-94520000568-2-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
 
Edition
Pages
29-42
Abstract
Currently, the content – the legal regulation segment – the notion of “candidate for the position of judge” of the state (not in the sense of arbitration, sports, etc.) court is reduced to the transfer of personal and other requirements, etc. to the position of judge. Meanwhile, it is obvious that in terms of his essential characteristics, the candidate for the position of judge should be an official who is preparing to become a judge. Such a person must have his own legal status, endowed with a certain set of rights, duties and responsibilities. The procedure for the promotion of a candidate to take up the position of a judge and empowerment of a judge, consisting now of nine stages and lasting an average year, should become shorter, more efficient, more meaningful, not reducible to simple expectation and get independent legislative fixing. The purpose of this study is to identify the requirements, parameters, conditions, characteristics, etc., which must be matched by the candidate for the position of judge at the final stage of his promotion to the judicial position. We are talking about special, professional and other tests, etc. candidate: questionnaire, professional, psycho-physiological, moral-ethical, etc., the passage of which should indicate the full readiness of the candidate to effectively send them justice. The aim of the study is to create a model of the legal institution of a candidate for judicial office, which allows to consolidate its basic parameters and characteristics legislatively. The methodological basis for the implementation of this study was the use of the dialectical method of cognition and the general scientific methods resulting from it: analysis, synthesis, comparison, induction, deduction, etc. The solution of this task was carried out on the basis of the private-scientific methods characteristic of modern jurisprudence: the historical comparative, which helped to reveal the gap in modern Russian law regarding the status of a candidate for the position of a judge as opposed to its presence – in its expanded form – in pre-revolutionary Russia; formal-logical, allowed to investigate the norms of legislation on the requirements for the position of a judge and to reveal their features, shortcomings and bottlenecks both in legal regulation and in practical law enforcement; Formal-legal, allowed to identify the imperfection of the legal consolidation of requirements for candidates for judicial positions, preventing their employment worthy of this professionals; System-structural analysis, which allows to consider the legal regulation of the selection of candidates for the position of judges and their empowerment in the system of legal norms, etc. The results of this study are formulated proposals on the legislative consolidation of status characteristics and other requirements, along with competitively comparable wishes for a candidate for the position of a judge. Elimination of unjustified barriers and restrictions, as well as the formation of scientifically verified requirements and competitively comparable wishes, enshrined in legislation, will ensure the qualitative strengthening of the judiciary of Russia and prevent the penetration of persons unworthy of objective grounds-the judicial mantle.
Keywords
judge, judge corps, candidate for the position of judge, empowerment of judges
Date of publication
01.01.2018
Number of purchasers
8
Views
1382
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Ross. pravosudie. 2017. № 2 (130). S. 10 

2. Vedomosti SND i VS RF. 1992. № 30, st. 1792

3. SZ RF. 2002. № 11, st. 1022

4. Pravosudie v sovremennom mire / pod red. V. M. Lebedeva, T. Ya. Khabrievoj. M., 2012. S. 386-412

5. Kleandrov M.I. Status sud'i: pravovoj i smezhnye komponenty. M., 2008


6. Vereschagina A.V. Dorevolyutsionnyj institut kandidatov na sudebnye dolzhnosti // Ross. pravosudie. 2014. № 6 (98). S. 41-50

7. Il'ina T. N. Reformirovanie instituta kandidatov na dolzhnosti po sudebnomu vedomstvu v Rossijskoj imperii 1891-1892 gg.: istoriko-pravovoj analiz // Uchenye zapiski ehlektron. nauch. zhurn. Kursk. gos. un-ta. 2011. № 18

8. Ilyukhin A.V., Ilyukhina V. A. Trebovaniya k kandidatam na dolzhnost' mirovogo sud'i po "Osnovnym polozheniyam preobrazovaniya sudebnoj chasti v Rossii" 1862 g. i Uchrezhdeniyu sudebnykh ustanovlenij 1864 g.: sravnitel'no-pravovoe issledovanie // Vestnik Voronezhsk. gos. un-ta. Ser. "Pravo". 2016. № 4. S. 127-136

9. Kutafin O.E., Lebedev V.M., Semigin G. Yu. Sudebnaya vlast' v Rossii: istoriya, dokumenty: v 6 t. / nauch. kons. proekta E.A. Skripilev. T. III. Ot Svoda zakonov k sudebnoj reforme 1864 g. / otv. red. A.V. Naumov. M., 2003. S. 444-446

10. Pejsikov V.V. Organizatsionnye aspekty otbora i podgotovki sudej v Rossijskoj Federatsii // Ross. pravosudie. 2006. № 6. S. 103-105

11. Pejsikov V.V. Kak stanovyatsya sud'yami: zarubezhnyj opyt i rossijskaya dejstvitel'nost'. Ch. 1. Frantsiya // Novaya yustitsiya. 2008. № 1. S. 36-43

12. Sachkov A.N., Titukhov M.B. Kandidat na dolzhnost' sud'i: problemy i regional'nyj opyt professional'noj podgotovki // Ross. sud'ya. 2007. № 11

13. Bagautdi-nov F.N., Khajrullin M.M. Trebovaniya k kandidatam na dolzhnost' sud'i v sovremennykh usloviyakh // Ross. yustitsiya. 2011. № 1

14. Solomatin A.S., Yastrebova A.I. Pravovoj status kandidata na dolzhnost' sud'i i ego kvalifikatsiya // Sovremennoe pravo. 2016. № 2

15. Vestnik VKKS RF. 2016. № 1 (47). S. 42, 43

16. Rakitina L.N. Kvalifikatsionnyj ehkzamen na dolzhnost' sud'i: k voprosu o putyakh ego sovershenstvovaniya // Ross. yustitsiya. 2009. № 8. S. 58

17. Ross. gaz. 2005. 24 marta

18. Bagautdinov F.N., Khajrullin M.M. Ukaz. soch. S. 39

19. Sbornik aktov o sude i statuse sudej Rossijskoj Federatsii. Vyp. 5: v 3 kn. Kn. 2. M., 2012. S. 9, 16

20. Ross. pravosudie. 2017. № 1(130). S. 31, 32

21. Makarova O. V. Institut predsedatelej sudov kak ehlement organizatsii, deyatel'nosti sudov obschej yurisdiktsii // Zhurnal ross. prava. 2017. № 6

22. Lur'e I.M. Ocherki drevneegipetskogo prava XVI-X vekov do n.eh. Pamyatniki i issledovaniya. L., 1960. S. 52

23. Kutafin O.E., Lebedev V.M., Semigin G. Yu. Ukaz. soch. S. 388, 389

24. Ilyukhin A.V., Ilyukhina V. A. Ukaz. soch. S. 132

25. Koni A. F. Mirovye sudy // Koni A. F. Sobr. soch.: v 8 t. T. 1. M., 1966. S. 322

26. Zakharov V.V., Savel'eva M. A. Ehvolyutsiya tsenzovoj sistemy v strukture mekhanizma formirovaniya korpusa mirovykh sudej v Rossii vo vtoroj polovine XIX - nachale XX v. // Mirovoj sud'ya. 2011. № 11. S. 23-27

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate