Везде
Nekotorye doktrinalnye itogi vzaimodeistviia Rossii s Evropeiskim Soiuzom po pravam cheloveka
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Nekotorye doktrinalnye itogi vzaimodeistviia Rossii s Evropeiskim Soiuzom po pravam cheloveka
Annotation
PII
S1026-94520000616-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Aleksei Stanislavovich 
Edition
Issue 6
Pages
26-34
Abstract

In the present article, the author considers an influence on the development of the Russian doctrine of international law and international justice affected by the 20 years of Russia’s participation in the activities of the Council of Europe in general and of the European Court of human rights in particular. The author argues that the Russian doctrine adjusted its approaches due to the experience gained from the practice of the European Court of human rights.

Keywords
European Court of human rights, European consensus, international treaties
Date of publication
01.06.2017
Number of purchasers
4
Views
1207
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

1. European Coart of Human Rights, Annual Report 2015. P. 199. 
 
 2. Guillaume G. The Use of Precedent by International Judges and Arbitrators // Journal of International Dispute Settlement. Vol. 2. 2011. No. 1. R. 5-23. 
 
 3. ECHR, Cossey v United Kingdom, Judgment, App no 10843/84, (A/184), [1990]. 
 
 4. ECHR, Scoppola v Italy (№ 2), Judgment (Grand Chamber) September 17, 2009. 
 
 5. ECHR, Sergey Zolotukhin v. Russia (Application no. 14939/03) Grand Chamber Judgment, 10 February 2009. 
 
 6. European Court of Human Rights, Annual Report 2015. P. 63. 
 
 7. Zor'kin V. D. Vzaimodejstvie natsional'nogo i nadnatsional'nogo pravosudiya na sovremennom ehtape: novye perspektivy // Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya. 2012. № 5. S. 6. 
 
 8. Proekt konventsii, razrabotannyj Komissiej mezhdunarodnogo prava OON 
 
 9. ECHR, Öcalan v. Turkey (Grand Chamber Judgment), para 163. 
 
 10. ECHR, Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v United Kingdom, App no 61498/08 (ECtHR, para 120). 
 
 11. ECHR, Hassan v United Kingdom App no 29750/09, Grand Chamber Judgement, 16 September 2014. 
 
 12. Resolution Res(2004)3 of the Committee of Ministers on judgments revealing an underlying systemic problem, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 12 May 2004 // search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx? ObjectID=09000016805dd190 
 
 13. Brighton Declaration of High Level Conference on theFuture of the European Court of Human Rights. April 20, 2012 // www.echr.coe.int/Documents/2012_Brighton_ FinalDeclaration_ENG.pdf 
 
 14. Fyrnys M. Expanding Competences by Judicial Lawmaking: The Pilot Judgment Procedure of the European Court of Human Rights // German Law Journal. Vol. 12. 2011. No. 5. P. 1252. 
 
 15. Roberts A. Triangular Treaties: The Extent and Limits of Investment Treaty Rights // Harvard International Law Journal. Vol. 56. 2015. P. 353-417. 
 
 16. ESPCh v svoem reshenii po delu Al-Adsani priznal zapret pytok v kachestve normy Jus Cogens. ECHR, case Al-Adsani v United Kingdom Appl. No. 35763/97, ECtHR, 
 
 17. November 2001, para 55, 34 EHRR 11, 2002. K takomu zhe vyvodu prishel MBTYu v reshenii po delu Furundzija. Prosecutor v Furundzija, Case no. IT-95-17/1-T10, Trial Chamber, Judgment, 10 December 1998, para 153. 
 
 18. Kovler A. I. Ehvolyutivnoe tolkovanie Evropejskoj konventsii po pravam cheloveka: vozmozhnosti i predely. Evropejskij Sud po pravam cheloveka kak sub'ekt tolkovaniya prava // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. 2016. № 3 (58). S. 92-100 
 
 19. ECHR, Tyrer v United Kingdom, App no 5856/72, 25 April 1978, para 31. 
 
 20. Helfer L. Consensus, Coherence and the European Convention on Human Rights // Cornell International Law Journal. Vol. 26. 1993. R. 139 
 
 21. ECHR, ECHR, Applications no. 30078/06, Konstantin Markin v. Russia, Judgment of 22 March 2012. 
 
 22. ECHR, ECHR, Applications no. 30078/06, Konstantin Markin v. Russia, Judgment of 22 March 2012, paras 29-30, 49. 
 
 23. Polgari Eh. Ukaz. soch. S. 110 
 
 24. Dzehtsiarou K. European Consensus and the Evolutive Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights // German Law Journal. Vol. 12. No. 10. P. 1735. 
 
 25. F. Biondi Dal Monte, Fontanelli F. The Decisions No. 348 and 349/2007 of the Italian Constitutional Court: The Efficacy of the European Convention in the Italian Legal System // German Law Journal. Vol. 9. 2008. No. 7. P. 889-932; Polocino O. The European Court of Human Rights and the Italian Constitutional Court: No ‘Groovy Kind of Love ']). 
 
 26. ECHR, OAO Neftyanaya Kompaniya Yukos v Russia App no 14902/04, Judgment (Just Satisfaction), 31 July 2014. 
 
 27. ECHR, Catan and Others v. Moldova and Russia, app. nos. 43370/04, 8252/05, and 18454/06, Grand chamber judgment, 19 October 2012. 
 
 28. ECHR, Anchugov and Gladkov v. Russia, Judgment of 4 July 2013. 
 
 29. Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2015. № 30. St. 4658. 
 
 30. Opredelenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF "Po zaprosu Arbitrazhnogo suda Tsentral'nogo okruga o proverke konstitutsionnosti punkta 4 Poryadka primeneniya osvobozhdeniya ot uplaty tamozhennykh poshlin pri vvoze otdel'nykh kategorij tovarov na edinuyu tamozhennuyu territoriyu Tamozhennogo soyuza" ot 3 marta 2015 g. // doc.ksrf.ru/decision/KSRFDecision190708.pdf 
 
 31. postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF «Po delu o razreshenii voprosa o vozmozhnosti ispolneniya v sootvetstvii s Konstitutsiej Rossijskoj Federatsii postanovleniya Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka ot 4 iyulya 2013 goda po delu "Anchugov i Gladkov protiv Rossii" v svyazi s zaprosom Ministerstva yustitsii Rossijskoj Federatsii» ot 19 aprelya 2016 g. // doc.ksrf.ru/decision/KSRFDecision230222.pdf 
 
 32. ECHR. Hirst v. the United Kingdom, Application N74025/01, Judgment of 6 October 2005. 
 
 33. Punzhin S. M. Pravovaya sistema Rossii i mezhdunarodnoe pravo (Variatsii na temu stat'i S. V. Bakhina) // Pravovedenie. 2010. № 2. S. 254 
 
 34. Ivanenko V. S. Mezhdunarodnye dogovory, Konstitutsiya i pravovaya sistema Rossijskoj Federatsii: ehvolyutsiya sootnosheniya i tendentsii vzaimodejstviya // Ross. ezhegodnik mezhdunarodnogo prava. 2009. SPb., 2010. S. 31. 
 
 35. Kalinichenko P. K voprosu o kollizii mezhdu postanovleniyami ESPCh Konstitutsiej Rossii v svete pozitsii Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF // Aktual'nye problemy ross. prava. 2016. № 2. S. 46. 
 
 36. Blankenagel' A., Levin I. "V printsipe nel'zya, no mozhno!.". Konstitutsionnyj Sud Rossii i delo ob obyazatel'nosti reshenij Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka // Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. 2015. № 5 (108). S. 162. 
 
 37. Tumanov V. A. Evropejskij Sud po pravam cheloveka: ocherk organizatsii i deyatel'nosti. M., 2001; Avtonomov A. S. Konstitutsionnoe i mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie // Aktual'nye problemy teorii i praktiki konstitutsionnogo sudoproizvodstva (Vyp. KhI). Sb. nauch. trudov. Kazan', 2016. S. 48-58. 
 
 38. Polgari Eh. Strasburgskij sud i evropejskij konsensus // Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. 2005. № 3. S. 109 
 
 39. Osminin B. Mezhdunarodnye dogovory v rossijskoj pravovoj sisteme (K 20-letiyu Federal'nogo zakona "O mezhdunarodnykh dogovorakh Rossijskoj Federatsii") // Zhurnal ross. prava. 2015. № 12. S. 126, 127.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate