Везде
Intentionality in medieval and baroque scholasticism
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Intentionality in medieval and baroque scholasticism
Annotation
PII
S2072-07260000616-6-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Galina Vdovina 
Edition
Volume 13 Issue 3
Pages
23-37
Abstract
The article presents a brief overview of intentional problems in the medieval and baroque schololasticism. It describes the current state of research in this field, proposes a peri­odization of the development of intentional ideas and outlines the characteristics of each period. In the 13th–14th centuries, intentional terminology and concepts were formed in the function of the needs of Trinitarian theology and theology of creation, only secon­darily descending to the philosophical level. The subordination of the intentional devel­opments to theological needs explains their “homelessness”, the absence of the doctrinal place assigned to them. However, at that time the main questions that contemporary in­tentional philosophy would be addressing were already formulated. The extremely poorly studied period from the middle 14th to the late 16th centuries was marked by an increased interest in the problems of reference. The third and most mature stage of scholastic inten­tionality falls on the Baroque era: the early 17th – middle 18th centuries. During thas pe­riod the embracing notion of intentional life was formulated, and the intentional problems as a whole were fixed in the science of the soul, where they gradually took the form of systematic intentional theories. In that time the intentional toolkit finds its active applica­tion to the epistemology and metaphysics. The article concludes with a hypothesis that it was Baroque intentional concepts that served as a source or at least the closest analogue of Brentano’s intentional ideas.
Keywords
scholasticism, intentionality, intentional object, intentional relation, inten­tional act
Date of publication
01.09.2020
Number of purchasers
22
Views
555
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

    

  1. Ambrosius Lezard de Belliquadro. Cursus philosophicus ex mira D. Thomae, T. IV. Taurini: Bartholomæi Zapatæ, 1664. 796 pp.
    2. 

  2. Ashworth, E.J. “Chimeras and Imaginary Objects: A Study in the Post-Medieval Theory of Sig­nification”, Vivarium, 1977, Vol. XV, No. 1, pp. 57‒77.
    3. 

  3. Ashworth, E.J. “Language and Logic”, The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Philosophy, ed. by A.S. McGrade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 73‒96.
    4. 

  4. Augustinus. “De Trinitate”, Patrologiae Cursus Completus. Series Latina, Т. 42, ed. J.-P. Migne. Paris: apud Garnier fratres, 1865, coll. 819‒1098.
    5. 

  5. Caston, V. “Aristotle and the Problem of Intentionality”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Re­search, 1998, Vol. 58, pp. 249‒298.
    6. 

  6. Caston, V. “Something and Nothing: The Stoics on Concepts and Universals”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 1999, Vol. 17, pp. 145‒213.
    7. 

  7. Caston, V. “Connecting Traditions: Augustine and the Greeks on Intentionality”, Ancient and Medieval Theories of Intentionality, ed. by D. Perler. Leiden: Brill, 2001, pp. 23‒48.
    8. 

  8. Caston, V. “Aristotle on Consciousness”, Mind, 2002, Vol. 111, pp. 751‒815.
    9. 

  9. Caston, V. “Gorgias on Thought and its Objects”, Presocratic Philosophy: Essays in honour of Alexander Mourelatos, ed. by V. Caston and D.W. Graham. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002, pp. 205‒232.
    10. 

  10. Caston, V. “Intentionality in Ancient Philosophy”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. by Ed.N. Zalta [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/intentionality-ancient/, accessed on 11.04.2020].
    11. 

  11. Cesalli, L. & Taieb, H. “Brentano and Medieval Ontology”, Phenomenological Studies – Re­vista Da Abordagem Gestáltica, 2018, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 417‒428.
    12. 

  12. Compton Carleton, Th. Philosophia universa. Antverpiae: apud Iacovum Mevrsium, 1649. 621 pp.
    13. 

  13. Cross, R. Duns Scotus’s Theory of Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. 240 pp.
    14. 

  14. Dionisius Blasco. Cursus philosophicus. Caesar-Augustae: apud Ioannem de Ybar, 1672. 726 pp.
    15. 

  15. Duns Scotus. Opera omnia, Vol. III: Ordinatio I, Dist. 3. Civitas Vaticana: Typis Polyglottis Va­ticanis, 1954. 428 pp.
    16. 

  16. Duns Scotus. Opera omnia, Vol. VI: Ordinatio I, Dist. 26‒48. Civitas Vaticana: Typis Polyglot­tis Vaticanis, 1963. 555 pp.
    17. 

  17. Duns Scotus. Opera omnia, Vol. XVI: Lectura I. Civitas Vaticana: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis, 1960. 746 pp.
    18. 

  18. Duns Scotus. Opera Philosophica, Vol. IV: Quaestiones super libros Metaphysicorum Aris­totelis, Libri VI–IX. St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute, 1997. 800 pp.
    19. 

  19. Franciscus de Oviedo. Integer cursus philosophicus. Lugduni: Sumptibus Philippi Borde, Lau­rentii Arnaudet Claudii Rigaud, 1651. 928 pp.
    20. 

  20. Friedman, R.L. Medieval Trinitarian Thought from Aquinas to Ockham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. 198 pp.
    21. 

  21. Friedman, R.L. Intellectual Traditions at the Medieval University: The Use of Philosophical Psychology in Trinitarian Theology among the Franciscans and Dominicans, 1250‒1350, Vol. I–II. Leiden: Brill, 2012. 1006 pp.
    22. 

  22. Giraldus Odonis, O.F.M. Opera Philosophica, Vol. II: De Intentionibus, ed. L.M. De Rijk. Lei­den: Brill, 2005. 898 pp.
    23. 

  23. Henricus de Gandavo. Quodlibeta, cum commentariis Vitalis Zuccolii, Vol. I. Venice: Apud Ja­cobum de Franciscis, 1613. 944 pp.
    24. 

  24. Hervaeus Natalis. Tractatus de secundis intentionibus. Parisii: Georg Mitelhus, 1489. 208 pp.
    25. 

  25. Izquierdo, S. Pharus scientiarum. Lugduni: Sumptibus Claudii Bourgeat, et Mich. Lietard, 1659. 410 pp.
    26. 

  26. Jacob P. “Intentionality”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. by Ed.N. Zalta [https://​plato.stanford.edu/entries/intentionality/, accessed on 08.04.2020].
    27. 

  27. Johannes a Sancto Thomae. Cursus Philosophicus Thomisticus, Vol. 2‒3. Coloniae Agrippinae: Sumptibus Constantini Münich, 1654. 672 pp.
    28. 

  28. Juaniz de Echalaz, J. Philosophia, continens dialecticam, physicam, animasticam et metaphysi­cam. Lugduni: Sumptibus Phil. Borde, Laur. Arnaud et Cl. Rigaud,1654. 830 pp.
    29. 

  29. King, P. “Duns Scotus on mental content”, Duns Scot à Paris 1302‒2002: actes du colloque de Paris, 2‒4 septembre 2002, ed. by O. Boulnois. Turnhout: Brepols, 2004, pp. 65‒88.
    30. 

  30. Klima, G. (ed.). Intentionality, Cognition and Mental Representation in Medieval Philosophy. New York: Fordham University Press, 2015. 360 pp.
    31. 

  31. Lacrosse, J. “Y a-t-il une intentionnalité plotinienne?”, Questions sur l’Intentionnalité, sous la dir. L. Couloubaritsis et A. Mazzù. Bruxelles: Ousia, 2008, pp. 31‒57.
    32. 

  32. McDonnell, C. “Understanding and Assessing Brentano’s Thesis in Light of His Modification of the Scholastic Concept of Intentionality”, Brentano Studien. Internationales Jahrbuch der Franz Brentano Forschung, 2015, Vol. 13, pp. 153‒182.
    33. 

  33. Novotný, D. Ens Rationis from Suarez to Caramuel: A Study in Scholasticism of the Baroque Era. New York: Fordham University Press, 2013. 296 pp.
    34. 

  34. Paulus, J. Henri de Gand: essai sur les tendances de sa métaphysique. Paris: J. Vrin, 1938. 402 pp.
    35. 

  35. Perler, D. (ed.) Ancient and Medieval Theories of Intentionality. Leiden: Brill, 2001. 347 pp.
    36. 

  36. Perler, D. Theorien der Intentionalität im Mittelalter. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 2002. 435 S.
    37. 

  37. Petrus Lombardus. “Sententiarum Libri Quatuor”, Patrologiae Cursus Completus. Series Latina, Т. 192, ed. J.-P. Migne. Paris: apud Garnier fratres, 1880, coll. 519‒964.
    38. 

  38. Pini, G. “Can God Create My Thoughts? Scotus’s Case against the Causal Account of Inten­tionality”, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 2011, Vol. 49, pp. 39‒63.
    39. 

  39. Ptolemaeus, J.B. Philosophia mentis et sensuum, secundum utramque Aristotelis methodum per­tractata, metaphysice et empirice. Romae: Sumptibus losephi Sangermani Corvi in Platea Pasquini (apud Petrum Oliverium), 1702. 839 pp.
    40. 

  40. Read, S. “The objective being of Ockham’s ficta”, Philosophical Quarterly, 1997, Vol. 27 (106), pp. 14‒31.
    41. 

  41. Solère, J.-L. “Tension et intention. Esquisse de l’histoire d’une notion”, Questions sur l’Inten­tionnalité, sous la dir. L. Couloubaritsis et A. Mazzù. Bruxelles: Ousia, 2008, pp. 59‒124.
    42. 

  42. Taieb, H. “The ‘Intellected Thing’ (res intellecta) in Hervaeus Natalis”, Vivarium, 2015, Vol. 53, pp. 26‒44.
    43. 

  43. Taieb, H. Relational Intentionality: Brentano and the Aristotelian Tradition. Dordrecht: Springer, 2018. 213 pp.
    44. 

  44. Thomas Aquinas. Opera omnia, Vol. 45/1: Sentencia libri De anima. Rome; Paris: Commissio Leonina; Vrin, 1984. 294 pp.
    45.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate