THE FUTURE AS A PROBLEM OF MODERN SOCIOLOGY
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
THE FUTURE AS A PROBLEM OF MODERN SOCIOLOGY
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000392-7-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Pages
13-22
Abstract
Interest in the future is returning – this is how you can assess the shifts in the topic of foreign sociologists ' speeches in recent years. Relevant data are provided, and the emphasis of speeches in the world sociological periodicals about this trend is analyzed, in particular, about the reaction to the forecast of the French economist T. Piketty of growth – up to the 2070s-of property polarization. Questions for possible discussion by sociologists of Russia of tendencies of its future are offered. The specifics of the future discourse in our country are shown and emphasized the important role of sociology and especially historical sociology in it, the directions of empirical research relevant to the topic are formulated.
Keywords
sociology of the future, discourse of the future, Piketty, social conflicts, historical sociology, the future of Russia
Date of publication
01.11.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
459
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Aleksander D. Smysly sotsial'noj zhizni: kul'tursotsiologiya. M.: Praksis, 2013.

Bestuzhev-Lada I.V. Global'nyj tekhnologicheskij prognoz na KhKhI vek // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2007. № 4. S. 22–33.

Buravoj M., Rajt Eh.O. Sotsiologicheskij marksizm (ch. I) // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2011. № 9. S. 18–29.

Vallerstajn I., Kollinz R., Mann M., Derlug'yan G., Kalkhun K. (red.). Est' li buduschee u kapitalizma? M.: Institut Gajdara, 2015 (angl. original – 2013).

Konstantinovskij D.L. Dinamika neravenstva. Rossijskaya molodezh' v menyayuschemsya obschestve: orientatsiya i puti v sfere obrazovaniya (ot 1960-kh godov k 2000-mu). M., 1999.

Kalekin-Fishman D. Inaya sotsiologiya vozmozhna: v zavisimosti ot soderzhaniya ponyatiya “inaya” // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2009. № 7. S.16–25.

Kostyleva L.V. Neravenstvo naseleniya Rossii: tendentsii, faktory, regulirovanie. Vologda: Institut sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya territorij RAN, 2011.

Myuller K., Pikel' A. Smena paradigm postkommunisticheskoj transformatsii // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2002. № 9. S. 67–82.

Mironov B.N. Kakaya doroga vedet k revolyutsii? Imuschestvennoe neravenstvo v Rossii za tri stoletiya, XVIII – nachalo XXI v. (stat'i 1 i 2) // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2014. № 8. S. 96–104; № 11. S. 121–129.

Selivanov A.I. Poznanie buduschego razvivayuschikhsya sotsial'nykh ob'ektov // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. № 4. C. 11–17.

Tikhonova N.E. Fenomen bednosti v sovremennoj Rossii // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2014a. № 1. C. 7–19.

Tikhonova N.E. Strukturnye predposylki i osnovnye tipy rossijskoj bednosti // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2014b. № 2. C. 5–16.

Toschenko Zh.T. Sotsiologiya: obschij kurs. M.: Prometej; Yurajt-M, 2004.

Toschenko Zh.T. Fantomy rossijskogo obschestva. M.: Tsentr sotsial'nogo prognozirovaniya i marketinga. 2015.

Turou L. Buduschee kapitalizma. Novosibirsk: Sibirskij khronograf. 1999 (original – 1997).

Tsyganov V.V., Shul'ts V.L. Vysokie gumanitarnye tekhnologii v politicheskoj sisteme obschestva // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2012. № 8. S. 85–93.

Scherbina V.V. Populyatsionno-selektsionnaya model' organizatsionnogo razvitiya: soderzhanie, sfera i perspektivy primeneniya // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2015. № 6. S. 78–96.

Scherbina V.V. Sotsiologo-diagnosticheskie tekhnologii v upravlenii: teoretiko-metodologicheskie aspekty razvitiya i primeneniya // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2007. № 3. S. 30–42.

Antonio R.J. Piketty’s nightmare capitalism: The return of rentier society and dedemocratization // Contemporary sociology. 2014. Vol 43. № 6. P. 783–790.

British Journal of Sociology. Special Issue: Piketty Symposium. 2014. Issue 4. P. ii–ii, 589–747.

FurthS., Dubay C.S. Six Demonstrably False Claims In Thomas Piketty’s Theory Of Wealth. URL: http://www.heritage.org/research/commentary/2014/9/false-claims-in-piketty-theory-of-wealth (data obrascheniya: 28.04.2015).

Kelly C. Conservatives panic over Piketty’s ‘Sapital in 21st Century’. URL: www.citizen-imes.com/story/opinion/cvontributors/2014/05/25/conservatives-panic-pikettys-capital-st=century/9502591/ (data obrascheniya: 14.05.2015).

Mayor T. Income inequality: Thomas Piketty and neo-Marxist revival // http://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/cato-journal/2015/2/cj-v35n1-4.pdf (data obrascheniya: 4.06.2015).

Moore S. The Robin Hood Fallacy: Piketty Would Take from the Rich to Give to the Poor. URL: http://dailysignal.com/2014/04/30/robin-hood-fallacy-piketty-take-rich-give-poor/ (data obrascheniya: 9.06.2015).

Reoplesworld.org/top.URL: peoplesworld.org/top-4-radical-conclusions-fro (data obrascheniya: 14.04.2015).

Piketty T. Le Capital au XXIe siècle. Paris: Seuil, 2013.

Piketty T. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MASS: Harvard University Press, 2014a.

Piketty T. Capital in the Twenty-First Century: a multidimensional approach to the history of capital and social classes // British Journal of Sociology. Special Issue: Piketty Symposium. 2014b.Vol. 65. P. 736–747.

Savage M. Piketty’s challenge for sociology // British Journal of Sociology. 2014 Vol. 65. Issue 4. P. ii–ii, 589–747.

Sayer A. Who’s Afraid of Critical Social Science? // Current Sociology. 2009. Vol. 57. № 6. P. 767–786.

Schulz M.S. The Futures We Want. Global Sociology and the Struggles for a Better World // Global Dialogue. Vol. 5. Issue 2 (June, 2015). R. 7–8.

Take action to end injustice and inequality in the world with Global Citizen!. URL: https://mail.yandex.ru/neo2/print.jsx?mid=2530000004019708074&_uid=47010182”\t”-blank-Huffington Rost<dailybrief@huffingtonpost.com (data obrascheniya: 17.4.2015).

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate