Библиография

Дополнительные библиографические источники и материалы

Калинин К., Шпилькин С. Комплексная диагностика фальсификаций на российских президентских выборах 2012 года // Троицкий вариант - наука. 2012. 27 марта. N 100.
Мягков А. Ю. "Техника непарных чисел" (представление метода) // Социальноэкономические и гуманитарные проблемы развития России: Межвуз. сб. науч. тр. / Ивановский гос. энерг. ун-т. Иваново, 2011. Вып. 7. С. 31 - 38.
Мягков А. Ю. Применение техники рандомизированного ответа в персональном и телефонном интервью//Социол. исслед. 2012. N7. С. 77 - 91.
Мягков А. Ю., Журавлева С. Л. Повышение качества данных в телефонном интервью: Методология и методы / Федеральное агентство по образованию, ГОУ ВПО "Ивановский государственный энергетический университет имени В. И. Ленина". Иваново, 2010.
Петрова А. Б., Мягков А. Ю. "Техника непарных чисел": экспериментальная оценка эффективности // Вопросы развития народного хозяйства Российской Федерации: Межвуз. сб. науч. тр. Вып. 7. Ч. 2. / Минобрнауки России, ГОУ ВПО "Ивановский государственный энергетический университет им В. И. Ленина". Иваново, 2011. С. 111 - 116.
Ahart A.M., Sackett P.R. A new method of examining relationships between individual difference measures and sensitive behavior criteria: Evaluating the unmatched count technique // Organizational Research Methods. 2004. Vol. 7. N1. P. 101 - 114.
Begin G., Boivin M., Bellerose J. Sensitive data collection through the random response technique: Some improvements // Journal of Psychology. 1979. Vol. 101. N 1. P. 53 - 65.
Blair G., Imai K. Statistical Analysis of List Experiments // Political Analysis. 2012. Vol. 20. N 1. P. 47 - 77.
Bockenholt U., Barlas S., Heijden van der P.G.M. Do randomized response designs eliminate response biases? An empirical study of non-compliance behavior // Journal of Applied Econometrics. 2009. Vol. 24. N 3. P. 377 - 392.
Boruch R.F. Relations among statistical methods for assuring confidentiality of social research data // Social Science Research. 1972. Vol. 1. N3. P. 403 - 414.
Corstange D. Sensitive questions, truthful answers? Modeling the list experiment with LISTIT // Political Analysis. 2009. Vol. 17. N 1. P. 45 - 63.
Coutts E., Jann B. Sensitive questions in online surveys: Experimental results for the randomized response technique (RRT) and the unmatched count technique (UCT) // ETH Zurich Sociology Working Paper. 2008. N 3. P. 1 - 33.
Coutts E., Jann B. Sensitive questions in online surveys: Experimental results for the randomized response technique (RRT) and the unmatched count technique (UCT) // Sociological Methods and Research. 2011. Vol. 40. N1. P. 169 - 193.
Dalton D.R., Daily C. M., Wimbush J. C. Collecting 'sensitive' data in business ethics research: A case for the unmatched count technique (UCT) // Journal of Business Ethics. 1997. Vol. 16. N 5. P. 1049 - 1057.
Dalton D.R., Wimbush J.C., Daily C.M. Using the unmatched count technique (UCT) to estimate base rates for sensitive behavior // Personnel Psychology. 1994. Vol. 47. N 5. P. 817 - 28.
De Jong G., Pieters R., Fox J. - P. Reducing social desirability bias through item randomized response: An application to measure underreported desires // Journal of Marketing Research. 2010. Vol. XLVII. N 1. P. 14 - 27.
Folsom R.E., Greenberg B.G., Horvitz D.G., Abernathy J.R. he two alternate questions randomized response model for human surveys // Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1973. Vol. 68. N 343. P. 525 - 530.
Glynn A.N. What can we learn with statistical truth serum? Design and analysis of the List Experiment. Technical Report, Department of Government, Harvard University. July 23, 2010 [online]. URL: http://polmeth.wustl.edu/media/Paper/glynnPolmeth10_1.pdf. (дата обращения 15.09.2012).
Gonzales-Ocantos E. et al. Vote buying and social desirability bias: Experimental evidence from Nicaragua. 2010 [online]. URL: http://www.yale.eduleitner/resources/PMF-papers/Nicaragua.VoteBuying.pdf (дата обращения 5.10.2011).
Greenberg B.G., Abul-Ela A-L.A., Simmons W.R., Horvitz D.G. The unrelated question randomized response model theoretical framework // Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1969. Vol. 64. N 327. P. 243 - 250.
Gueorguiev D., Malesky E. Foreign investment and bribery: A firm-level analysis of corruption in Vietnam // Journal of Asian Economics. 2012. Vol. 23. N 2. P. 111 - 129.
Holbrook A.L., Krosnick J.A. (a) Social desirability bias in voter turnout reports: Tests using the item count technique // Public Opinion Quarterly. 2010. Vol. 74. N 1. P. 37 - 67.
Holbrook A.L., Krosnick J.A. (b) Measuring voter turnout by using the randomized response technique: Evidence calling into question the method's validity // Public Opinion Quarterly. 2010. Vol. 74. N 2. P. 328 - 343.
Hox J., Lensvelt-Mulders G. Randomized response analysis in Mplus II Structural Equation Modeling. 2004. Vol. 11. N 4. P. 615 - 620.
Imai K. Multivariate regression analysis for the item count technique // Journal of the American Statistical Association. 2011. Vol. 106. N494. P. 407 - 416.
Jann B. Plagiarism in student papers: Prevalence estimation using special techniques for sensitive question (presentation). Venice International University. November 30, 2009 [online]. URL: http://www.ls4.soziologie.unimuenchen.de/downloads/venice09/jann_viu09.pdf (дата обращения 12.09.2012).
Janus A.L. The influence of social desirability pressures on expressed immigration attitudes // Social Science Quarterly. 2010. Vol. 91. N 4. P. 928 - 946.
Karlan D., Zinman J. A Methodological note on using loan application and survey data to measure poverty and loan uses of microcredit clients. 2010 [online]. URL: http://www.dart-mouth.edu/~jzinman/Papers/Measurement Paper_29jan2010. pdf (дата обращения 4.10.2011).
Karlan D.S., Zinman J. List randomization for sensitive behavior: An application for measuring use of loan proceeds //Journal of Development Economics. 2012. Vol. 98. N 1. P.71 - 75 [online]. URL: http://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeedeveco/v_3a983ay_3a2012_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a71 - 75.htm (дата обращения 12.09.2012). La Brie J.W., Earleywine M. Sexual risk behaviors and alcohol: Higher base rates revealed using the unmatched-count technique // Journal of Sex Research. 2000. Vol. 37. N 3. P. 321 - 326.
Lara D., Garcia S.G., Ellertson Ch. et al. The measure of induced abortion levels in Mexico using random response technique // Sociological Methods and Research. 2006. Vol. 35. N 2. P. 279 - 301.
Miller J.D. A New Survey Technique for Studying Deviant Behavior. Ph.D. thesis, Washington, D.C.: The George Washington University, 1984.
Miller J.D., Harrel A.V., Cisin I.A. A new technique for surveying deviant behavior: Itemcount estimates of marijuana, cocaine, and heroin // Paper presented at the Annual 
Meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. St. Petersburg, FL, 1986.
Peeters C.F.W., Lensvelt-Mulders G.J.L.M., Lasthuizen K. A note on a simple and practical randomized response framework for eliciting sensitive dichotomous and quantitative information // Sociological Methods and Research. 2010. Vol. 39. N 2. P. 283 - 296.
Petrdczi A., Nepusz T., Cross P. et al. New non-randomised model to assess the prevalence of discriminating behaviour: A pilot study on mephedrone // Substance Abuse
Treatment, Prevention, and Policy. 2011. Vol. 6. Art. N20. P. 2 - 18 [online]. URL: pttp://www.substanceabuse-policy.com/ content/6/1/20 (дата обращения 19.09.2012).
Rayburn N.R., Earleywine M., Davison G.C. Base rates of hate crime victimization among college students // Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2003. Vol. 18. N 10. P. 1209 - 1221.
Schhjver A.De. Sample survey on sensitive topics: Investigating respondents' understanding and trust in alternative versions of the randomized response technique // Journal of Research Practice. 2012. Vol. 8. N 1. Article M1 [online]. URL: http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/277/250 (дата обращения 13.09.2012).
Streb M.J., Burrell B., Frederick B., Genovese M.A. Social desirability effects and support for a female American president // Public Opinion Quarterly. 2008. Vol. 72. N 1. P. 76 - 89.
Tsuchiya T., Hirai Y. Elaborate item count questioning: Why do people underreport in item count responses? // Survey Research Methods. 2010. Vol. 4. N 3. P. 139 - 149.
Tsuchiya T., Hirai Y., Ono S. A study of the properties of the item count technique // Public Opinion Quarterly. 2007. Vol. 71. N 2. P. 253 - 272.
Walsh J.A., Braithwaite J. Self-reported alcohol consumption and sexual behavior in males and females: Using the unmatched-count technique to examine reporting practices of socially sensitive subjects in a sample of university students // Journal of Alcohol &
Drug Education. 2008, August [online]. URL: pttp://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_go2545/is_2_52/ai_n294589-98/?tag=content;coh (дата обращения 12.09.2012).
Warner S.L. Randomized response: A survey technique for eliminating evasive answerbias // Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1965. Vol. 60. N 309. P. 63 - 69.
Wimbush J.C., Dalton D.R. Base rate for employee theft: Convergence of multiple methods // Journal of Applied Psychology. 1997. Vol. 82. N 5. P. 756 - 763.