THE HUMAN DIMENSION OF RUSSIAN BUSINESS: TOWARDS A DEMOCRATIC AND HUMANISTIC TYPE OF SOCIAL ORGANIZATION OF THE FIRM
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
THE HUMAN DIMENSION OF RUSSIAN BUSINESS: TOWARDS A DEMOCRATIC AND HUMANISTIC TYPE OF SOCIAL ORGANIZATION OF THE FIRM
Annotation
PII
S0132-16250000616-3-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Pages
43-54
Abstract
The article continues to present the results of an empirical study in 80 Russian business organizations. Two parameters of the firm's social organization are analyzed: “imperious” and “humanistic”. The study revealed the predominance of undemocratic forms of Russian business organization. The dominant type of political consciousness of employees is characterized by passivity, tolerance for violations of moral and legal norms by the Manager. High workloads are a condition for greater satisfaction with workers ' earnings, better material security, and career advancement from specialists and managers. The organic connection of the achievement, democratic and humanistic vectors of the social organization of Russian business is revealed.
Keywords
democracy in the organization, decision-making, employee submission, workloads, standard of living
Date of publication
05.07.2012
Number of purchasers
1
Views
516
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

Denisova Yu.S. Trudovye peregruzki kak tendentsiya v rabochem protsesse // Sotsiol. issled. 2004. № 5.
Ob'em i struktura denezhnykh dokhodov naseleniya po istochnikam postupleniya, 2008–2010 gg.
Ofitsial'nyj sajt Federal'noj sluzhby gosudarstvennoj statistiki. URL: http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/population/urov/urov_13kv.xls (data obrascheniya: 19.09.2011)
Khirshman A.O. Vykhod, golos i vernost': Reaktsiya na upadok firm, organizatsij i gosudarstv. M.: Novoe izdatel'stvo, 2009.
Ehfendiev A.G., Balabanova E.S. Uchastie rabotnikov v upravlenii rossijskikh biznes-organizatsij // Sovremennyj menedzhment: problemy, gipotezy, issledovaniya: Sb. nauch. tr. Vyp. 2. M.: GU-VShEh, 2010.
Bakker A.B., Schaufeli W.B. Positive organizational behavior: engaged employees in flourishing organizations // Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2008. Vol. 29. Iss. 2.
Luthans F. The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior // Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2002. Vol. 23. Iss. 6.
Wefald A.J., Downey R.G. Job engagement in organizations: Fad, fashion, or folderol? // Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2009. Vol. 30. Iss. 1.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate